Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-wxvwp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-14T05:02:54.001Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Problems in Plant Pathology and Entomology Field Trials*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 October 2008

G. H. Freeman
G. H. Freeman
Affiliation:
East African Agriculture and Forestry Research Organization, Nairobi, Kenya
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The problems arising in field trials in plant pathology and entomology are considered under five headings: (1) experimental design, (2) conduct of experiments, (3) records, (4) analysis and (5) interpretation. Solutions to the problems are not always given, but it is useful to recognize their existence. Examples are given from a wide range of crops

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Experimental Agriculture , Volume 3 , Issue 4 , October 1967, pp. 351 - 358
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1967

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Hoblyn, T. N., Pearce, S. C. & Freeman, G. H. (1954). Biometrics, 10, 503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freeman, G. H. (1959). Appl. Statist. 8, 13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morris, R. F. (1960). Ann. Rev. Entomol. 5, 243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strickland, A. H. (1961). Ann. Rev. Entomol. 6, 201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Negisi, K., Satoo, T. & Yagi, K. (1957). J. Jap. For. Soc. 39, 380.Google Scholar
Ackley, W. B., Crandall, P. C. & Russell, T. S. (1958). Proc. Amer. Soc. hort. Sci. 78, 326.Google Scholar
Freeman, G. H. (1958). Rep. E. Mailing Res. Stn. for 1957, 83.Google Scholar
Bolle, F. (1953). Angew. Bot. 27, 16.Google Scholar
Clarke, G. M. & Corke, A. T. K. (1956). Rep. Long Ashton Res. Stn. for 1955, 196.Google Scholar
Bertossi, F. (1957). Notiz. Mal. Piante 40/41, 177.Google Scholar
Longworth, J. F. & Thresh, J. M. (1963). Ann. appl. Biol. 52, 217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bliss, C. I. & Fisher, R. A. (1953). Biometrics 9, 176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freeman, G. H. & Hall, M. J. (1955). Rep. E. Mailing Res. Stn. for 1954, 102.Google Scholar
Bliss, C. I. & Owen, A. R. G. (1959). Biometrika 45, 37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Analysis—percentages

Reimer, C. (1959). Can. Ent. 91, 88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reimer, C. (1959). Can. Ent. 91, 88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Analysis-trend

Ciferri, R. (1957). Notiz. Mai. Piante 40/41, 174.Google Scholar

General

Finney, D. J. (1956). J. Roy. Statist. Soc. A, 119, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, P. W. ed. (1962). Progress in Soil Zoology. Butterworths. Part I, Methods of sampling and analysis—statistical aspects, 1–71.Google Scholar