No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Simulating Root System Development of Short-duration Pigeonpea
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 03 October 2008
Summary
Length and weight of pigeonpea roots were measured weekly in different soil layers and compared with estimates obtained from a root simulation model using daily climatic data, soil physico-chemical properties and dry matter allocation to roots. Daily moisture content and temperature at different soil depths were well simulated using sub-routines from the CERES-Maize model. Daily allocation of dry matter to roots was calculated from logistic functions fitted to the growth data for shoots and roots. Although root length and weight tended to be underestimated by the model, regressions between measured and simulated root growth were highly significant so that the model could, with a few modifications, be used to predict root system development.
Information
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1996
References
REFERENCES
Adams, F. & Moore, B. L. (1983). Chemical factors affecting root growth in subsoil horizons of coastal plains soils. Soil Science Society of America Journal 47:99–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arihara, J., Ae, N. & Okada, K. (1991). Root development of pigeonpea and chickpea and its significance in different cropping systems. In Phosphorous Nutrition of Grain Legumes in the Semi-Arid Tropics, 183–194 (Eds Johansen, C., Lee, K. K. and Sahrawat, K. L.). Patancheru, India. International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT).Google Scholar
Asady, G. H. & Smucker, A. J. M. (1989). Compaction and root modifications of soil aeration. Soil Science Society of America Journal 53:251–254.Google Scholar
Blum, A. & Ritchie, J. T. (1984). Effect of soil surface water content on sorghum root distribution in the soil. Field Crops Research 8:169–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drew, M. C. (1983). Plant injury and adaptation to oxygen deficiency in the root environment: A review. Plant and Soil 75:179–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DSSAT, Ver.2.1. (1987). Decision support system for agrotechnology transfer. In DSSAT User's Guide. Hawaii, Honolulu. International Benchmark Soils Network for Agrotechnology Transfer (IBSNAT), University of Hawaii. Honolulu, HI, 96822.Google Scholar
EI-Swaify, S. A., Pathak, P., Rego, T. J. & Singh, S. (1985). Soil management for optimized productivity under rainfed conditions in the semi-arid tropics. Advances in Soil Science 1:1–64.Google Scholar
Gerard, C. J., Sexton, P. & Shaw, G. (1982). Physical factors influencing soil strength and root growth. Agronomy Journal 74:875–879.Google Scholar
Gregory, P. J. (1986). Response to temperature in a stand of pearl millet (Pennisetum typhoides S. and H.). Journal of Experimental Botany 37: 379–388.Google Scholar
Heeraman, D. A. & Juma, N. G. (1993). A comparison of minirhizotron, core.and monolith methods for quantifying barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) and faba bean (Vicia faba L.) root distribution. Plant and Soil 148:29–41.Google Scholar
Hoogenboom, G. & Huck, M. G. (1986). ROOTSIMU V4.0-A Dynamic Simulation of Root Growth, Water.Uptake, and Biomass Partitioning in a Soil-Plant-Atmosphere Continuum: Update and Documentation. Alabama Agricultural Experimental Station Agronomy and Soils Departmental Series No. 109.Google Scholar
Huck, M. G. & Hillel (1983). A model of root growth and water uptake accounting for photosynthesis, respiration. transpiration, and soil hydraulics. In Advances in Irrigation, Vol. 2, 273–333 (Ed. Hillel, D.). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Ito, O., Matsunaga, R., Tobita, S. & Rao, T. P. (1992). Rooting behavior of intercropped pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan (L) Millspaugh) and sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L) Moench). In Root Ecology and its Practical Application, 412–422 (Eds Kutchera, L., Hubl, E.. Lichtenegger, E., Persson, H. and Sobotic, M.). Bodenkultur: Wien University.Google Scholar
Jones, C. A., Bland, W. L., Ritchie, J. T. & Williams, J. R. (1991). Simulation of root growth. In Modeling Plant and Soil Systems, 91–123 (Eds Hanks, R. J. and Ritchie, J. T.). American Society of Agronomy, Inc., Crop Science Society of America, Inc. and Soil Science Society of America, Inc.Google Scholar
Jones, C. A. & Kiniry, J. R. (1986). CERES-Maize: A Simulation Model of Maize Growth and Development. College Station, Texas. Texas A&M University Press.Google Scholar
Merrill, S. D. & Rawlins, S. L. (1979). Distribution and growth of sorghum roots in response to irrigation frequency. Agronomy Journal 71:735–745.Google Scholar
Page, A. L., Miller, R. H. & Keeney, D. R. (1982). Methods of Soil Analysis Part 2. Madison, Wisconsin, USA: American Society of Agronomy.Google Scholar
Ritchey, K. D., Silva, J. E. & Costa, U. F. (1982). Calcium deficiency in clayey B horizons of savanna Oxisols. Soil Science 133:378–382.Google Scholar
Rivera, E., Silva, S. & Vicente-Chandler, J. (1983). Distribution of pigeonpeas, cassava, coffee and grass roots in Ultisol. Journal of Agriculture University of Puerto Rico 6(7):278–285.Google Scholar
Robertson, M. J., Fukai, S., Hammer, G. L. & Ludlow, M. M. (1993). Modelling root growth of grain sorghum using the CERES approach. Field Crops Research 33:113–130.Google Scholar
Thornley, J. H. M. & Johnson, I. R. (1990). Plant and Crop Modelling. A Mathematical Approach to Plant and Crop Physiology, 79–89. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- 7
- Cited by