Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-kwt9d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-14T01:20:59.903Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Some General Principles of Crop Rotation Experiments

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 October 2008

D. A. Preece
D. A. Preece
Affiliation:
Statistics Department, Rothamsted Experimental Station, Harpenden, Herts, AL5 2JQ, England
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

This review paper deals with some of the general statistical principles of crop rotation experiments. The basic terminology of the subject is defined. Attention is paid to the fundamental design principle that each phase of a rotation should each year be present in an experiment involving that rotation. The inclusion of ‘auxiliary’ treatments - usually fertilizer treatments - is discussed. Consideration is given to matters influencing the choice of size and shape of plots. The statistician's role in planning a rotation experiment is portrayed as onerous. Emphasis is put on the importance of care and good practice in the management of a long-term agricultural experiment. Complications arising in the statistical analysis of data from a rotation trial are sketched.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Experimental Agriculture , Volume 22 , Issue 2 , April 1986, pp. 187 - 198
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Boyd, D. A. & Trist, P. J. O. (1966). The Saxmundham rotation experiments: rotation II, 1899–1952. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 66:337–339.Google Scholar
Cochran, W. G. (1939). Long-term agricultural experiments (with Discussion). Supplement to the Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 6:104–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crowther, F. & Cochran, W. G. (1942). Rotation experiments with cotton in the Sudan Gezira. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 32:390–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dyke, G. V. (1974). Comparative Experiments with Field Crops. London: Butterworths.Google Scholar
Glassborow, P. W. (1964). Contribution to Discussion of ‘Theory of cyclic rotation experiments’ by H. D. Patterson. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B 26:43.Google Scholar
John, J. A. & Quenouille, M. H. (1977). Experiments: Design and Analysis, 2nd edition. London: Griffin.Google Scholar
Patterson, H. D. (1964). Theory of cyclic rotation experiments (with Discussion). Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B 26:1–45.Google Scholar
Patterson, H. D. (1965). The factorial combination of treatments in rotation experiments. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 65:171–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patterson, H. D. & Lowe, B. I. (1970). The errors of long-term experiments. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 74:53–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearce, S. C. (1983). The Agricultural Field Experiment: A Statistical Examination of Theory and Practice. Chichester: Wiley-Interscience.Google Scholar
Roberts, P. (1964). Contribution to Discussion of ‘Theory of cyclic rotation experiments’ by H. D. Patterson. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B 26:41–42.Google Scholar
Sibbesen, E., Andersen, C. E., Andersen, S. & Flensted-Jensen, M. (1985). Soil movement in long-term field experiments as a result of cultivations. I. A model for approximating soil movement in one horizontal dimension by repeated tillage. Experimental Agriculture 21:101–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stevens, W. L. (1956). Rotation experiment in Brazil. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 50:102–109.Google Scholar
Trist, P. J. O. & Boyd, D. A. (1966). The Saxmundham rotation experiments: rotation I. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 66:327–336.Google Scholar
Yates, F. (1949). The design of rotation experiments. In Technical Communication No. 46, Proceedings of the First Commonwealth Conference on Tropical and Sub-Tropical Soils, 1948, 142–155. Harpenden, England: Commonwealth Bureau of Soil Science.Google Scholar
Yates, F. (1954). The analysis of experiments containing different crop rotations. Biometrics 10:324–346.Google Scholar
Yates, F. (1964a). Sir Ronald Fisher and the design of experiments. Biometrics 20:307–321.Google Scholar
Yates, F. (1964b). Contribution to Discussion of ‘Theory of cyclic rotation experiments’ by H. D. Patterson. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B 26:40–41.Google Scholar