Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-kwt9d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-12T06:25:37.515Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Yield Stability Studies in Soyabeans (Glycine Max)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 October 2008

S. M. Funnah and
C. Mak
S. M. Funnah
Affiliation:
Department of Genetics and Cellular Biology, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
C. Mak
Affiliation:
Department of Genetics and Cellular Biology, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Regression analysis, stability variance method, and the genotype-grouping technique were used to investigate the relative yield stability of 20 soyabean genotypes, grown in 12 diverse environments in Malaysia in 1978. With the regression analysis, four genotypes were observed to be unstable for grain yield; however, for the remaining 16 genotypes with non-significant regression coefficients, a substantial proportion of the g × e interaction was non-linearly related to the environmental indices. With the second and third methods less than half of the genotypes turned out to be stable for grain yield. Generally, for some genotypes, the stability classification was the same for all three methods.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Experimental Agriculture , Volume 16 , Issue 4 , October 1980, pp. 387 - 392
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Breese, E. L. (1969). Heredity 24:27–44.Google Scholar
Byth, D. E., Eisemann, R. L. & De Lacy, I. H. (1976). Heredity 37:215–230.Google Scholar
Comstock, R. E. & Moll, R. H. (1963). In Statistical Genetics and Plant Breeding. Nat. Acad. Sci., Washington D.C., Publ. N. 982:164–196.Google Scholar
Easton, H. S. & Clements, R. J. (1973). J. Agric. Sci., Cambridge 80:43–52.Google Scholar
Eberhart, S. A. & Russel, W. A. (1966). Crop Sci. 6:36–40.Google Scholar
Finlay, K. W. & Wilkinson, G. N. (1963). Aust. J. Agric. Res. 14:742–754.Google Scholar
Francis, T. R. & Kannenberg, L. W. (1978). Can. J. Plant Sci. 58:1029–1034.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freeman, G. H. (1973). Heredity 31:339–354.Google Scholar
Hill, J. (1975). J. Agric. Sci., Cambridge 85:477–493.Google Scholar
Knight, R. (1970). Euphytica 19:225–235.Google Scholar
Perkins, J. M. & Jinks, J. L. (1968). Heredity 23:339–356.Google Scholar
Shukla, G. K. (1972). Heredity 29:237–245.Google Scholar
Witcombe, J. R. & Whittington, W. J. (1971). Heredity 26:397–411.Google Scholar
Yates, F. & Cochran, W. G. (1938). J. Agric. Sci., Cambridge 28:556–580.Google Scholar