Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-2n9c9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-14T16:23:45.512Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Birth, death and public good provision

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2025

John Duffy and
Jonathan Lafky
John Duffy*
Affiliation:
Department of Economics, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697, USA
Jonathan Lafky*
Affiliation:
Department of Economics, Lafayette College, Easton, PA 18042, USA
*
duffy@uci.edu
jlafky@gmail.com
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We explore the effect of fixed versus dynamic group membership on public good provision. In a novel experimental design, we modify the traditional voluntary contribution mechanism (VCM) by periodically replacing old members of a group with new members over time. Under this dynamic, overlapping generations matching protocol we find that average contributions experience significantly less decay over time relative to a traditional VCM environment with fixed group membership and a common termination date. These findings suggest that the traditional pattern of contribution and decay seen in many public goods experiments may not accurately reflect behavior in groups with changing membership, as is the case in many real-world environments.

Keywords

Public goodsOverlapping generationsVoluntary contribution mechanismExperimental economicsC72C92D64H41

Information

Type
Original Paper
Information
Experimental Economics , Volume 19 , Issue 2 , June 2016, pp. 317 - 341
Copyright
Copyright © 2015 Economic Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10683-015-9439-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

References

Andreoni, J (1988). Why free ride?: Strategies and learning in public goods experiments. Journal of Public Economics, 37(3), 291–304. 10.1016/0047-2727(88)90043-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andreoni, J, Croson, RTA Plott, CR, & Smith, VL (2008). Partners versus strangers: Random re-matching in public goods experiments. Handbook of experimental economics results volume 1, Amsterdam: North-Holland 776–783. 10.1016/S1574-0722(07)00082-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brekke, Kjell Arne, Hauge, Karen Evelyn, Lind, Jo Thori, & Nyborg, Karine (2011). Playing with the good guys. Public good game with endogenous group formation. Journal of Public Economics, 95(9–10), 1111–1118. 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2011.05.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burnett, K (2002). A donor-based approach to the business of raising money, San Francisco: Wiley.Google Scholar
Chaudhuri, Ananish (2011). Sustaining cooperation in laboratory public goods experiments: A selective survey of the literature. Experimental Economics, 14(1), 47–83. 10.1007/s10683-010-9257-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chaudhuri, Ananish, Graziano, Sara, & Maitra, Pushkar (2006). Social learning and norms in an experimental public goods game with inter-generational advice. Review of Economic Studies, 73(2), 357–380. 10.1111/j.1467-937X.2006.0379.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Claudia, K, & van Winden, F (2000). Conditional cooperation and voluntary contributions to public goods. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 102(1), 23–39. 10.1111/1467-9442.00182Google Scholar
Dawes, Robyn M, McTavish, Jeanne, & Shaklee, Harriet (1977). Behavior communication, and assumptions about other people’s behavior in a commons dilemma situation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35(1), 1–11. 10.1037/0022-3514.35.1.1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deck, C., David, P., & Vernon, S. (2011). Double bubbles in assets markets with multiple generations. Working paper.Google Scholar
Dufwenberg, M, Tobias, L, & Evan, M (2005). Bubbles and experience: An experiment. American Economic Review, 95, 1731–1737. 10.1257/000282805775014362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ehrhart, K.-M. & Claudia, K. (1999). Mobility and cooperation: On the run. Working paper 99S–24 CIRANO, Montreal.Google Scholar
Fehr, E, & Gächter, S (2000). Cooperation and punishment in public goods experiments. American Economic Review, 90(4), 980–994. 10.1257/aer.90.4.980CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischbacher, U. (2007). z-Tree: Zurich toolbox for ready-made economic experiments, Experimental Economics, 10(2), 171–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischbacher, U, Gachter, S, & Fehr, E (2001). Are people conditionally cooperative? Evidence from a public goods experiment. Economics Letters, 71(3), 379–404. 10.1016/S0165-1765(01)00394-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guala, F (2005). The Methodology of Experimental Economics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 10.1017/CBO9780511614651CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Issac, RM, Walker, JM, & Thomas, SH (1984). Divergent evidence on free riding: An experimental examination of possible explanations. Public Choice, 43, 113–149. 10.1007/BF00140829CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Issac, RM, & Walker, JM (1988). Group size effects in public goods provision: The voluntary contributions mechanism. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 103(1), 179–199. 10.2307/1882648CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kosfeld, M, Okada, A, & Riedl, A (2009). Institution formation in public goods games. American Economic Review, 99(4), 1335–1355. 10.1257/aer.99.4.1335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ledyard, JO Kagel, JH, & Roth, AE (1995). Public goods: A survey of experimental research. The handbook of experimental economics, Princeton: Princeton University Press 111–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malmendier, U. & Stefan, N. (2014). Learning from inflation experiences. Working paper, University of Michigan, September 8, 2014.Google Scholar
Marimon, Ramon, & Sunder, Shyam (1993). Indeterminacy of equilibria in a hyperinflationary world: Experimental evidence. Econometrica, 61(5), 1073–1107. 10.2307/2951494CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Offerman, HT, Potters, J, & Verbon, HAA (2001). Cooperation in an overlapping generations experiment. Games and Economic Behavior, 36(2), 264–275. 10.1006/game.2000.0816CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robert, LS (2005). Competing against experienced and inexperienced players. Experimental Economics, 8, 55–75. 10.1007/s10683-005-0437-3Google Scholar
Samuelson, P (1958). An exact consumption-loan model of interest with or without the social contrivance of money. Journal of Political Economy, 66(6), 467–482. 10.1086/258100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sonnemans, J, Schram, A, & Offerman, T (1999). Strategic behavior in public good games: When partners drift apart. Economics Letters, 62, 35–41. 10.1016/S0165-1765(98)00203-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Duffy and Lafky supplementary material

Duffy and Lafky supplementary material
Download Duffy and Lafky supplementary material(File)
File 3.2 MB