Hostname: page-component-6898cfcb55-zsp5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-12T02:43:02.002Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Communication in multilateral bargaining with joint production

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2025

Andrzej Baranski and
Caleb A. Cox
Andrzej Baranski*
Affiliation:
Division of Social Science, New York University Abu Dhabi, Bldg A5 Office 1131, Saadiyat NYUAD Campus, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
Caleb A. Cox*
Affiliation:
Department of Economics, Virginia Commonwealth University, Box 844000, Snead Hall, 301 W. Main Street, 23284 Richmond, VA, USA
*
a.baranski@nyu.edu
cacox@vcu.edu
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We experimentally investigate the effect of pre-bargaining communication on productive incentives in a multilateral bargaining game with joint production under two conditions: observable and unobservable investments. In both conditions, communication fosters fair sharing and is rarely used to pit individuals against each other. Proportional sharing arises with observable investments with or without communication, leading to high efficiency gains. Without investment observability, communication is widely used to truthfully report investments and call for equitable sharing, allowing substantial efficiency gains. Since communication occurs after production, our results highlight a novel indirect channel through which communication can enhance efficiency in social dilemmas. Our results contrast with previous findings on bargaining over an exogenous fund, where communication leads to highly unequal outcomes, competitive messages, and virtually no appeals to fairness.

Keywords

Multilateral bargainingCommunicationProfit sharing

JEL classification

H41: Public GoodsC78: Bargaining Theory • Matching TheoryD72: Political Processes: Rent-Seeking, Lobbying, Elections, Legislatures, and Voting BehaviorD71: Social Choice • Clubs • Committees • Associations

Information

Type
Original Paper
Information
Experimental Economics , Volume 26 , Issue 1 , March 2023, pp. 55 - 77
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Economic Science Association 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Abbink, K., Dong, L., & Huang, L. (2018). Talking behind your back: Asymmetric communication in a three-person dilemma. CeDEx Discussion Paper Series ISSN 1749–3293.Google Scholar
Adams, J.S. (1965). Inequity in social exchange. In Advances in experimental social psychology, Vol. 2, pp. 267–299. Elsevier.Google Scholar
Agranov, M., Cotton, C., & Tergiman, C. (2020). Persistence of power: Repeated multilateral bargaining with endogenous agenda setting authority. Journal of Public Economics, 184, 104126 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2019.104126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agranov, M., & Tergiman, C. (2014). Communication in multilateral bargaining. Journal of Public Economics, 118, 75–85. 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2014.06.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agranov, M., & Tergiman, C. (2019). Communication in bargaining games with unanimity. Experimental Economics, 22(2), 350–368. 10.1007/s10683-018-9571-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andreoni, J., & Rao, J. M. (2011). The power of asking: How communication affects selfishness, empathy, and altruism. Journal of Public Economics, 95(7–8), 513–520. 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2010.12.008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Azerrad, M. (1992). Inside the heart and mind of Nirvana. Rolling Stone. Retrieved from Last accessed October 10, 2019.Google Scholar
Baranski, A. (2016). Voluntary contributions and collective redistribution. American Economic Journal, 8(4), 149–73.Google Scholar
Baranski, A. (2019). Endogenous claims and collective production: An experimental study on the timing of profit-sharing negotiations and production. Experimental Economics, 22(4), 857–884. 10.1007/s10683-018-9591-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baranski, A., & Kagel, J. H. (2015). Communication in legislative bargaining. Journal of the Economic Science Association, 1(1), 59–71. 10.1007/s40881-015-0011-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baranski, A. Morton, R. (in press). The determinants of multilateral bargaining: A comprehensive analysis of Baron and Ferejohn majoritarian bargaining experiments. Experimental Economics.Google Scholar
Baron, D. P., Bowen, T. R., & Nunnari, S. (2017). Durable coalitions and communication: Public versus private negotiations. Journal of Public Economics, 156, 1–13. 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2017.09.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baron, D. P., & Ferejohn, J. A. (1989). Bargaining in legislatures. American Political Science Review, 83(4), 1181–1206. 10.2307/1961664CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bochet, O., Page, T., & Putterman, L. (2006). Communication and punishment in voluntary contribution experiments. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 60(1), 11–26. 10.1016/j.jebo.2003.06.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolton, G. E., & Brosig-Koch, J. E. (2012). How do coalitions get built? Evidence from an extensive form coalition game with and without communication. International Journal of Game Theory, 41(3), 623–649. 10.1007/s00182-011-0307-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolton, G. E., Chatterjee, K., & McGinn, K. L. (2003). How communication links influence coalition bargaining: A laboratory investigation. Management Science, 49(5), 583–598. 10.1287/mnsc.49.5.583.15148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradfield, A. J., & Kagel, J. H. (2015). Legislative bargaining with teams. Games and Economic Behavior, 93, 117–127. 10.1016/j.geb.2015.08.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cappelen, A. W., Hole, A. D., Sørensen, EØ, & Tungodden, B. (2007). The pluralism of fairness ideals: An experimental approach. American Economic Review, 97(3), 818–827. 10.1257/aer.97.3.818CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cason, T. N., & Khan, F. U. (1999). A laboratory study of voluntary public goods provision with imperfect monitoring and communication. Journal of Development Economics, 58(2), 533–552. 10.1016/S0304-3878(98)00124-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charness, G. (2012). Communication in bargaining experiments. In The oxford handbook of economic conflict resolution.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charness, G., & Dufwenberg, M. (2006). Promises and partnership. Econometrica, 74(6), 1579–1601. 10.1111/j.1468-0262.2006.00719.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charness, G., & Dufwenberg, M. (2011). Participation. American Economic Review, 101(4), 1211–37 10.1257/aer.101.4.1211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, J. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20(1), 37–46. 10.1177/001316446002000104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, R., DeJong, D. V., Forsythe, R., & Ross, T. W. (1992). Communication in coordination games. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107(2), 739–771. 10.2307/2118488CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diermeier, D., & Morton, R. (2005). Experiments in majoritarian bargaining. In Social Choice and Strategic Decisions, pp. 201–226. Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dong, L., Falvey, R., & Luckraz, S. (2019). Fair share and social efficiency: A mechanism in which peers decide on the payoff division. Games and Economic Behavior, 115, 209–224. 10.1016/j.geb.2019.02.016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drouvelis, M., Nosenzo, D., & Sefton, M. (2017). Team incentives and leadership. Journal of Economic Psychology, 62, 173–185. 10.1016/j.joep.2017.07.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duffy, J., & Feltovich, N. (2002). Do actions speak louder than words? An experimental comparison of observation and cheap talk. Games and Economic Behavior, 39(1), 1–27. 10.1006/game.2001.0892CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elkins, K. (2018). The Red Sox just won the World Series-here’s how much money they’ll earn.Google Scholar
Eraslan, H. (2002). Uniqueness of stationary equilibrium payoffs in the Baron–Ferejohn model. Journal of Economic Theory, 103(1), 11–30. 10.1006/jeth.2001.2820CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eraslan, H., & Evdokimov, K. S. (2019). Legislative and multilateral bargaining. Annual Review of Economics, 11(1), 443–472. 10.1146/annurev-economics-080218-025633CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feltovich, N., & Swierzbinski, J. (2011). The role of strategic uncertainty in games: An experimental study of cheap talk and contracts in the Nash demand game. European Economic Review, 55(4), 554–574. 10.1016/j.euroecorev.2010.07.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fréchette, G., Kagel, J. H., & Lehrer, S. F. (2003). Bargaining in legislatures: An experimental investigation of open versus closed amendment rules. American Political Science Review, 97(2), 221–232. 10.1017/S0003055403000637CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fréchette, G., Kagel, J. H., & Morelli, M. (2005). Behavioral identification in coalitional bargaining: An experimental analysis of demand bargaining and alternating offers. Econometrica, 73(6), 1893–1937. 10.1111/j.1468-0262.2005.00641.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fréchette, G., Kagel, J. H., & Morelli, M. (2005). Nominal bargaining power, selection protocol, and discounting in legislative bargaining. Journal of Public Economics, 89(8), 1497–1517. 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2004.02.009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gächter, S., & Riedl, A. (2006). Dividing justly in bargaining problems with claims. Social Choice and Welfare, 27(3), 571–594. 10.1007/s00355-006-0141-zCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gangadharan, L., Nikiforakis, N., & Villeval, M. C. (2017). Normative conflict and the limits of self-governance in heterogeneous populations. European Economic Review, 100, 143–156. 10.1016/j.euroecorev.2017.07.013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gantner, A., Horn, K., & Kerschbamer, R. (2019). The role of communication in fair division with subjective claims. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 167, 72–89. 10.1016/j.jebo.2019.09.015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greiner, B. (2015). Subject pool recruitment procedures: Organizing experiments with ORSEE. Journal of the Economic Science Association, 1, 114–125. 10.1007/s40881-015-0004-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herings, P. J. J., Meshalkin, A., & Predtetchinski, A. (2018). Subgame perfect equilibria in majoritarian bargaining. Journal of Mathematical Economics, 76, 101–112. 10.1016/j.jmateco.2018.03.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Isaac, R. M., & Walker, J. M. (1988). Communication and free-riding behavior: The voluntary contribution mechanism. Economic Inquiry, 26(4), 585–608. 10.1111/j.1465-7295.1988.tb01519.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karagözoğlu, E. (2012). Bargaining games with joint production. The Oxford handbook of economic conflict resolution. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Karagözoğlu, E., & Riedl, A. (2014). Performance information, production uncertainty, and subjective entitlements in bargaining. Management Science, 61(11), 2611–2626. 10.1287/mnsc.2014.2012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kartik, N. (2009). Strategic communication with lying costs. Review of Economic Studies, 74(4), 1359–1395. 10.1111/j.1467-937X.2009.00559.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Konow, J. (2000). Fair shares: Accountability and cognitive dissonance in allocation decisions. American Economic Review, 90(4), 1072–1091. 10.1257/aer.90.4.1072CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33(1), 159–174. 10.2307/2529310CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miller, L., Montero, M., & Vanberg, C. (2018). Legislative bargaining with heterogeneous disagreement values: Theory and experiments. Games and Economic Behavior, 107, 60–92. 10.1016/j.geb.2017.11.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ostrom, E., Walker, J., & Gardner, R. (1992). Covenants with and without a sword: Self-governance is possible. American Political Science Review, 86(2), 404–417. 10.2307/1964229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roth, A. (1987). Bargaining phenomena and bargaining theory. Laboratory experimentation in economics: Six points of view (pp. 14–41). Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sally, D. (1995). Conversation and cooperation in social dilemmas: A meta-analysis of experiments from 1958 to 1992. Rationality and Society, 7(1), 58–92. 10.1177/1043463195007001004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stoddard, B., Cox, C. A., & Walker, J. M. (2020). Incentivizing provision of collective goods: Allocation rules. Southern Economic Journal. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
Stoddard, B., Walker, J. M., & Williams, A. (2014). Allocating a voluntarily provided common-property resource: An experimental examination. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 101, 141–155. 10.1016/j.jebo.2014.02.019CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sutton, J. (1986). Non-cooperative bargaining theory: An introduction. The Review of Economic Studies, 53(5), 709–724. 10.2307/2297715CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valley, K., Thompson, L., Gibbons, R., & Bazerman, M. H. (2002). How communication improves efficiency in bargaining games. Games and Economic Behavior, 38(1), 127–155. 10.1006/game.2001.0855CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van der Heijden, E., Potters, J., & Sefton, M. (2009). Hierarchy and opportunism in teams. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 69(1), 39–50. 10.1016/j.jebo.2008.09.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Dolder, D., Van den Assem, M. J., Camerer, C. F., & Thaler, R. H. (2015). Standing united or falling divided? High stakes bargaining in a TV game show. American Economic Review, 105(5), 402–07 10.1257/aer.p20151017CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Baranski and Cox supplementary material

Baranski and Cox supplementary material
Download Baranski and Cox supplementary material(File)
File 388.6 KB