Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-qr5l4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-05T07:26:47.579Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Similarities and differences when building trust: the role of cultures

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2025

Fabian Bornhorst ,
Andrea Ichino ,
Oliver Kirchkamp ,
Karl H. Schlag  and
Eyal Winter
Fabian Bornhorst
Affiliation:
European University Institute, Florence, Italy
Andrea Ichino
Affiliation:
CEPR, CESifo and IZA, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
Oliver Kirchkamp
Affiliation:
University of Jena, Jena, Germany K.H. Schlag (ISI)
Karl H. Schlag*
Affiliation:
Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain
Eyal Winter
Affiliation:
The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
*
e-mail: karl.schlag@upf.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We run an experiment in which students of different European nationalities are matched in groups of five and repeatedly choose with whom within their group they want to play a trust game. Participants observe of each other age, gender, nationality and number of siblings. The region of origin, “North” or “South” is a major determinant of success in the experiment. Participants tend to trust those they trusted before and who trusted them. We do not find evidence of regional discrimination per se. It is only the underlying and significant differences in behavior that translate through repeated interactions into differences in payoffs between the two regions.

Keywords

TrustTrustworthinessEuropean regionsExperiments

JEL classification

C91: Laboratory, Individual Behavior C92: Laboratory, Group Behavior Z13: Economic Sociology • Economic Anthropology • Language • Social and Economic Stratification

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Experimental Economics , Volume 13 , Issue 3 , September 2010 , pp. 260 - 283
Copyright
Copyright © Economic Science Association 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi: 10.1007/s10683-010-9240-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

References

Acemoglou, D., Johnson, S., & Robinson, J. A. (2001). The colonial origins of comparative development: An empirical investigation. American Economic Review, 91, 1369–1401.10.1257/aer.91.5.1369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Altmann, S., Dohmen, T., & Wibral, M. (2007). Do the reciprocal trust less? IZA Discussion Paper No. 3010.Google Scholar
Ananish, C., & Gangadharan, L. (2007). An experimental analysis of trust and trustworthiness. Southern Economic Journal, 73(4), 959–985.Google Scholar
Arrow, K. (1972). Gifts and exchanges. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 1, 343–362.Google Scholar
Banfield, E. C. (1958). The moral basis of a backward society. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Bellemare, C., & Kröger, S. (2007). On representative social capital. European Economic Review, 51, 183–202.10.1016/j.euroecorev.2006.03.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bentolila, S., & Ichino, A. (2007). Unemployment and consumption near and far away from the Mediterranean? Journal of Population Economics, 21, 255–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berg, J., Dickhaut, J., & McCabe, K. (1995). Trust, reciprocity and social history. Games and Economic Behavior, 10, 122–142.10.1006/game.1995.1027CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchan, N. R., Johnson, E. J., & Croson, R. T. A. (2006). Let's get personal: an international examination of the influence of communication, culture and social distance on other regarding preferences. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 60(3), 373–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burks, S. V., Carpenter, J. P., & Verhoogen, E. (2003). Playing both roles in the trust game. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 51(2), 195–216.10.1016/S0167-2681(02)00093-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) (2003). The world fact book. http://www.cia.gov/cia/publications/factbook/.Google Scholar
Charness, G., Du, N., & Yang, C.-L. (2009). Trust and trustworthiness reputations in an investment game (Mimeo).10.2139/ssrn.1572055CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cochard, F., Nguyen Van, P., & Willinger, M., (2004). Trusting behavior in a repeated investment game. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 55(1), 31–44.10.1016/j.jebo.2003.07.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Csukás, P. F., Kovács, T., & Willinger, M. (2008). The determinants of trusting and reciprocal evidence from an intercultural experiment. Journal of Economic Development, 33(1), 71–95.10.35866/caujed.2008.33.1.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engle-Warnick, J., & Slonim, R. L. (2006). Learning to trust in indefinitely repeated games. Games and Economic Behavior, 54(1), 95–114.10.1016/j.geb.2004.10.009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feldman, B. (2005). Relative importance and value. Kellstadt Graduate School of Business (Mimeo). http://www.prismanalytics.com/docs/RelativeImportance.pdf.Google Scholar
Fershtman, C., & Gneezy, U. (2001). Discrimination in a segmented society: an experimental approach. Quaterly Journal of Economics, 116, 351–377.10.1162/003355301556338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fershtman, C., Gneezy, U., & Verboven, F., (2005). Discrimination and nepotism: the efficiency of the anonymity rule. Journal of Legal Studies, 34(2), 371–394.10.1086/429846CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fukuyama, F. (1995). Trust. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Glaeser, E. L., Laibson, D. I., Scheinkman, J. A., & Soutter, C. L. (2000). Measuring trust. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115(3), 811–846.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glaeser, E. L., a Porta, R., Lopez-De-Silanes, F., & Schleifer, A. (2004). Do Institutions cause growth (NBER working paper No. W10568).Google Scholar
Greif, A. (1994). Cultural beliefs and the organization of society: a historical and theoretical reflection on collectivist and individualist societies? Journal of Political Economy, 102(5), 912–950.10.1086/261959CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greig, F., & Bohnet, I. (2006). Is there reciprocity in a reciprocal-exchange economy? Evidence of gendered norms from a slum in Nairobi, Kenya (Mimeo). http://ksghome.harvard.edu/~ibohnet/researchpdf/Greig%20Bohnet%2006_01_06.pdf.Google Scholar
Grömping, U. (2007). Estimators of relative importance in linear regression based on variance decomposition. The American Statistician, 61, 139–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guiso, L., Sapienza, P., & Zingales, L. (2004a). The role of social capital in financial development. American Economic Review, 94, 526–556.10.1257/0002828041464498CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guiso, L., Sapienza, P., & Zingales, L. (2004b). Cultural biases in economic exchange (NBER working paper No. 1105).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, R.E., & Jones, C. (1999). Why do some countries produce much more output per worker than others? Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114(1), 83–116.10.1162/003355399555954CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Healy, P. J. (2007). Group reputations, stereotypes, and cooperation in a repeated labor market. American Economic Review, 97, 1751–1773.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holm, H. J., & Danielson, A. (2005). Tropic trust versus Nordic trust: experimental evidence from Tanzania and Sweden. Economic Journal, 115, 505–532.10.1111/j.1468-0297.2005.00998.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holm, H. J., & Nystedt, P. (2005). Intra-generational trust—a semi-experimental study of trust among different generations. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 58(3), 403–419.10.1016/j.jebo.2003.10.013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King-Casas, B., Tomlin, D., Anen, C., Camerer, C.F., Quartz, S.R., & Read Montague, P., (2005). Getting to know you: reputation and trust in a two-person economic exchange. Science, 308(5718), 78–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knack, S., & Keefer, P. (1997). Does social capital have an economic payoff? A cross-country investigation. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 52, 1251–1287.10.1162/003355300555475CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kreps, D. M., & Wilson, R. (1982). Reputation and imperfect information. Journal of Economic Theory, 27, 253–279.10.1016/0022-0531(82)90030-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
La Porta, R., Lopez-De-Silanes, F., Schleifer, A., & Vishny, R. (1997). Trust in large organizations. American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings, 87, 333–338.Google Scholar
La Porta, R., Lopez-De-Silanes, F., Schleifer, A., & Vishny, R. (1999). The quality of government. The Journal of Law, Economics and Organization, 15, 222–279.10.1093/jleo/15.1.222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Putnam, R. D. (1993). Making democracy work: civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Schotter, A. (1981). The economic theory of social institutions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511983863CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schotter, A., & Sopher, B. (2006). Trust and trustworthiness in games: an experimental study of intergenerational advice. Experimental Economics, 9, 123–145.10.1007/s10683-006-5386-yCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slonim, R. (2006). Gender selection discrimination: evidence from a trust game (Mimeo). Case Western Reserve University.Google Scholar
Slonim, R., & Garbarino, E. (2008). Increases in trust and altruism from partner selection: experimental evidence. Experimental Econonomics, 11, 134–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sutter, M., & Kocher, M. G. (2007). Trust and trustworthiness across different age groups. Games and Economic Behavior, 59, 364–382.10.1016/j.geb.2006.07.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tabellini, G. (2005). Culture and institutions: economic development in the regions of Europe (Mimeo). Bocconi University.Google Scholar
Weber, E. U., & Hsee, C. K. (1998). Cross-cultural difference in risk perception, but cross cultural similiarities in attitudes towards perceived risk. Management Science, 44(9), 1205–1217.10.1287/mnsc.44.9.1205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willinger, M., Keser, C., Lohmann, C., & Usunier, J.-C. (2003). A comparison of trust and reciprocity between France and Germany: experimental investigation based on the investment game. Journal of Economic Psychology, 24, 447–466.10.1016/S0167-4870(02)00165-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Bornhorst et al. supplementary material

On-Line Appendix
Download Bornhorst et al. supplementary material(File)
File 417.2 KB