Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-2dmjx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-10T23:08:27.338Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Intermat and intramat competition in banana studied using 32P

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 September 2006

Sajan Kurien ,
Paickattumana Suresh Kumar ,
Nerukavil Varieth Kamalam  and
Pallacken Abdul Wahid
Sajan Kurien
Affiliation:
RARS, Kerala Agricultural University, Kumarakom, PO 686 566, Kottayam, Kerala State, India
Paickattumana Suresh Kumar
Affiliation:
College of Horticulture, Kerala Agricultural University, PO 680 656, India
Nerukavil Varieth Kamalam
Affiliation:
College of Horticulture, Kerala Agricultural University, PO 680 656, India
Pallacken Abdul Wahid
Affiliation:
College of Horticulture, Kerala Agricultural University, PO 680 656, India
Get access

Abstract

Introduction. Competition between plants on a mat (intramat) and between plants on different clumps (intermat) is quite common in crops such as banana. A study was therefore undertaken to know the extent of intramat and intermat competition using isotopic techniques. Materials and methods. The competition between plants in a mat and between mats were recorded in a combination of three spacings and five physiological phases of sucker retention by giving 32P to an experimental plant using soil injection techniques and monitoring the levels of recovery. The recovery of the isotope was recorded in the applied plant and its daughter (intramat) and in the neighboring border plant and its sucker (intermat). Results. The study revealed that, when 32P was given by soil injection techniques to one plant, it could be recovered in the border plant and its sucker during both years of study. In the first year, activity in initial samplings in border clumps were the highest, with the widest spacing in the experimental plant showing the highest recovery, but a differential pattern of recovery was observed at different samplings in the border clumps. In the irrigated crop of the second year, the highest recovery was observed at the closest spacing in both the experimental and border clumps. With respect to sucker retention at definite physiological phases, the recovery was the highest at the late vegetative phase, the flower bud initiation and the shooting phase. The recovery in the mother plant and its sucker and the border plant and its sucker studied separately gave a measurement of the intramat competition. Conclusion. The differential nature seen with retention phases confirms the requirement and intensity of activity with defined physiological phases and the overall need to evaluate and redefine recommendations, taking into consideration the critical physiological phases.

Keywords

IndiaMusanutrition physiologytracer techniquesradioisotopesdevelopmental stagesplant competitionIndeMusaphysiologie de la nutritiontechnique des traceursisotope radioactifstade de développementcompétition végétale

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Fruits , Volume 61 , Issue 4 , July 2006 , pp. 225 - 235
Copyright
© CIRAD, EDP Sciences, 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Anon., Bulletin of statistics, 9 (3/4), FAO, Rome, Italy, 1996, pp. 114–115.
Abbot, M.L., Fraley, L.J., A review: radiotracer methods to determine root distribution, Env. Exp. Bot. 31 (1991) 1–10. CrossRef
Atkinson, D., The distribution and effectiveness of roots of tree crops, Hortic. Rev. 2 (1980) 425–470.
Bohm W., Methods of studying root systems, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany, 1979.
Pinkerton, H., Simpson, J.R., The use of stable strontium as a chemical tracer for root penetration, Aust. J. Agric. Res. 30 (1979) 239–249. CrossRef
Martin, M.P.L.D., Snaydon, R.W., Drenman, D.S.H., Lithium as a non-radioactive tracer for roots in inter cropped species, Plant Soil 64 (2) (1982) 203–208. CrossRef
Anon., Root activity pattern of some tree crops, IAEA, Techn. Ser., Vienna, Austria, 170, 1975, 154 p.
Anon., Package of practices recommendation, Kerala Agric. Univ., Trichur, India, 1995.
Koshy M., Flower bud differentiation in banana, Coll. Agric., Kerala Agric. Univ., Thesis, Vellayani, India, 1989, 87 p.
Sobhana, A., Aravindakshan, M., Wahid, P.A., Root activity patterns of Banana (var. Nendran) under irrigated and rainfed conditions, J. Nucl. Agric. Biol. 18 (2) (1989) 117–123.
Wahid P.A., Kamalam N.V., Sankar S.J., Determination of phosphorus-32 in wet-digested plant leaves by Cerenkov counting, Int. J. Appl. Radiat. Isot. (1985) 323–324.
Rajeevan P.K., Intra clonal variations and nutritional studies in banana cv. Palayankodan, Kerala Agric. Univ., Thesis, Trichur, India, 1985, 96 p.
Wahid, P.A., Kamalam, N.V., Sankar, S.J., A device for soil injection of 32P solution in root activity studies of tree crops, J. Plant. Crop. 16 (1) (1988) 62–64.
Panse V.G., Sukhatme P.V., Statistical methods for agricultural workers, Indian Counc. Agric. Res. (ICAR), New Delhi, India, 1978.
Ahmed, K., Mannam, A., Effect of size of pit and spacing on performance of Amritsagar banana, Punjab Fruit J. 32 (1970) 7–13.
Chattopadhyay P.K., Chattopadhyay S., Mait S.C., Bose T.K., Effect of plant density on growth, yield and quality of banana, in: Mathukrishan E., Abdul Khader J.B.M. Md (Eds.), Natl. Symp. Ban. Prod. Technol., TNAU, Coimbatore, India, 1980, 88 p.
Kurien, S., Anil, B.K., Kumar, S.P., Wahid, P.A., Kamalam, N.V., Nutrient studies in banana using 32P, Musa news, Infomusa 8 (1) (1999) 35–36.
Kurien, S., Goswami, A.M., Deb, D.L., Studies on influence of flush on root activity in citrus using 32P, Trop. Agric. 69 (4) (1992) 306–314.
Casper, B.B., Jackson, R.B., Plant competitions underground, Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 28 (1997) 545–570. CrossRef
Aerts, R., Interspecific competition in natural plant communities: mechanisms, trade off and plant soil feed backs, J. Exp. Bot. 50 (1999) 29–37. CrossRef
Tofinga, M.P., Snaydon, R.W., The root activity of cereals and peas when grown in pure stands and mixtures, Plant Soil 142 (1992) 281–285. CrossRef
Lecompte, F., Ozier-Lafontaine, H., Pages, L., The relationship between static and dynamic variables in the description of root growth. Consequences for field interpretation of rooting variability, Plant Soil 236 (1) (2001) 19–31. CrossRef
Lecompte, F., Vacuelle, A., Pages, L., Number, position, diameter and initial direction of growth of primary roots in Musa, Ann. Bot. 90 (1) (2002) 43–51. CrossRef
Araya M., Blanco F., Changes in the stratification and spatial distribution of the banana ( Musa AAA cv. Grand Nain), J. Plant Nutr. 24 (11) (2001)1679–1693.