Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-j7cmm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-08T21:55:44.981Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A general model for the evolution of recombination

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 April 2009

N. H. Barton
N. H. Barton
Affiliation:
Division of Biological Sciences, University of Edinburgh, King's Buildings, Edinburgh EH9 3JT, UK
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

A general representation of multilocus selection is extended to allow recombination to depend on genotype. The equations simplify if modifier alleles have small effects on recombination. The evolution of such modifiers only depends on how they alter recombination between the selected loci, and does not involve dominance in modifier effects. The net selection on modifiers can be found explicitly if epistasis is weak relative to recombination. This analysis shows that recombination can be favoured in two ways: because it impedes the response to epistasis which fluctuates in sign, or because it facilitates the response to directional selection. The first mechanism is implausible, because epistasis must change sign over periods of a few generations: faster or slower fluctuations favour reduced recombination. The second mechanism requires weak negative epistasis between favourable alleles, which may either be increasing, or held in check by mutation. The selection (si) on recombination modifiers depends on the reduction in additive variance of log (fitness) due to linkage disequilibria (υ1 < 0), and on non-additive variance in log (fitness) (V′2, V′3,.. epistasis between 2, 3.. loci). For unlinked loci and pairwise epistasis, si = − (υ1 + 4V2/3)δr, where δr is the average increase in recombination caused by the modifier. The approximations are checked against exact calculations for three loci, and against Charlesworth's analyses of mutation/selection balance (1990), and directional selection (1993). The analysis demonstrates a general relation between selection on recombination and observable components of fitness variation, which is open to experimental test.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Genetics Research , Volume 65 , Issue 2 , April 1995 , pp. 123 - 144
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1995

References

Altenberg, L., & Feldman, M. W., (1987). Selection, generalized transmission and the evolution of modifier genes. I. The reduction principle. Genetics 117, 559–572.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barton, N. H., (1986). The effects of linkage and density-dependent regulation on gene flow. Heredity 57, 415–426.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barton, N. H., & Turelli, M., (1991). Natural and sexual selection on many loci. Genetics 127, 229–255.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bell, G., & Smith, J. Maynard, (1986). Short term selection for recombination among mutually antagonistic species. Nature 328, 66–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergman, A., Otto, S. P., & Feldman, M. W., (1994). On the evolution of recombination in haploids and diploids. Complexity, in press.Google Scholar
Bernstein, H., Hopf, F. A., & Michod, R. E., (1988). Is meiotic recombination an adaptation for repairing DNA, producing genetic variation, or both? In The Evolution of Sex (ed. Michod, R. E., and Levin, B. R.), pp. 139–160. Sunderland, Massachusetts: Sinauer Press.Google Scholar
Brooks, L. D., (1988). The evolution of recombination rates. In The Evolution of Sex (ed. Michod, R. E., and Levin, B. R.), pp. 87–105. Sunderland, Massachussetts: Sinauer Press.Google Scholar
Brooks, L. D., & Marks, R. W., (1986). The organization of genetic variation for recombination in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 114, 525–547.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bulmer, M. G., (1980). The Mathematical Theory of Quantitative Genetics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Burt, A., & Bell, G., (1987). Mammalian chiasma frequencies as a test of two theories of recombination. Nature 326, 803–805.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Charlesworth, B., (1976). Recombination modification in a fluctuating environment. Genetics 83, 181–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charlesworth, B., (1990). Mutation-selection balance and the evolutionary advantage of sex and recombination. Genetical Research 55, 199–221.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Charlesworth, B., (1993). Directional selection and the evolution of sex and recombination. Genetical Research 61, 205–224.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Charlesworth, B., & Charlesworth, D., (1975). An experiment on recombination load in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetical Research 25, 267–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charlesworth, B., & Charlesworth, D., (1985 a). Genetic variation in recombination in Drosophila. I. Responses to selection and preliminary genetic analysis. Heredity 54, 71–83.Google Scholar
Charlesworth, B., & Charlesworth, D., (1985 b). Genetic variation in recombination in Drosophila. II. Genetic analysis of a high recombination stock. Heredity 54, 85–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charlesworth, D., Morgan, M. T., & Charlesworth, B., (1990). Inbreeding depression, genetic load, and the evolution of outcrossing rates in a multilocus system with no linkage. Evolution 44, 1469–1489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chinnici, J. P., (1971). Modification of recombination frequency in Drosophila. I. Selection for increased and decreased crossing over. Genetics 69, 71–83.Google Scholar
Cockerham, C. C., (1984). Additive by additive variance with inbreeding and linkage. Genetics 108, 487–500.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eshel, I., & Feldman, M. W., (1970). On the evolutionary effect of recombination. Theoretical Populations Biology 1, 88–100.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ewens, W. J., (1989). An interpretation and proof of the Fundamental Theorem of Natural Selection. Theoretical Populations Biology 36, 167–180.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Falconer, D. S., (1985). A note on Fisher's ‘average effect’ and ‘average excess’. Genetical Research 46, 337–348.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Feldman, M. W., Christiansen, F. B., & Brooks, L. D., (1980). Evolution of recombination in a constant environment. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (USA) 77, 4838–4841.Google Scholar
Feldman, M. W., & Krakauer, J., (1976). Genetic modification and modifier polymorphisms. In Population Genetics and Ecology (ed. Karlin, S., and Nevo, E.), pp. 547–583. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Feldman, M. W., & Liberman, U., (1986). An evolutionary reduction principle for genetic modifiers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (USA) 83, 4824–4827.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Feldman, M. W., & Otto, S. P., (1989). More on recombination and selection in the modifier theory of sex-ratio distortion. Theoretical Population Biology 35, 207–225.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Felsenstein, J., (1965). The effect of linkage on directional selection. Genetics 42, 349–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Felsenstein, J., (1988). Sex and the evolution of recombination. In The Evolution of Sex (ed. Michod, R. E., and Levin, B. R.), pp. 74–86. Sunderland, Massachussetts: Sinauer Press.Google Scholar
Fisher, R. A., (1930). The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gimelfarb, A., & Lande, R., (1994). Simulation of marker assisted selection for non-additive traits. Genetical Research 64, 127–136.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hamilton, W. D., (1980). Sex vs non-sex vs parasite. Oikos 35, 282–290.Google Scholar
Hamilton, W. D., (1993). Haploid dynamic polymorphism in a host with matching parasites: effects of mutation/subdivision, linkage and patterns of selection. Journal of Heredity 84, 328–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaenike, J., (1978). An hypothesis to account for the maintenance of sex within populations. Evolutionary Theory 3, 191–194.Google Scholar
Kacser, H., & Burns, J. A., (1981). The molecular basis of dominance. Genetics 97, 639–666.Google Scholar
Kondrashov, A. S., (1984). Deleterious mutations as an evolutionary factor. I. The advantage of recombination. Genetical Research 44, 199–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kondrashov, A. S., (1988). Deleterious mutations and the evolution of sexual reproduction. Nature 336, 435–441.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mather, K., (1943). Polygenic inheritance and natural selection. Biological Reviews 18, 32–64.Google Scholar
Smith, J. Maynard, (1976). What determines the rate of evolution? American Naturalist 110, 331–338.Google Scholar
Smith, J. Maynard, (1978). The Evolution of Sex. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, J. Maynard, (1980). Selection for recombination in a polygenic model. Genetical Research 35, 269–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, J. Maynard, (1988). Selection for recombination in a polygenic model: the mechanism. Genetical Research 51, 59–63.Google Scholar
Mukai, T., (1977). Genetic variance for viability and linkage disequilibrium in natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster. In Measuring Selection in Natural Populations (ed. Christiansen, F. B., and Fenchel, T. M.), pp. 97–112. Berlin: Springer Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagylaki, T., (1993). The evolution of multilocus systems under weak selection. Genetics 134, 627–647.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nee, S., (1989). Antagonistic coevolution and the evolution of genotypic randomisation. Journal of Theoretical Biology 140, 499–518.Google Scholar
Sturtevant, A. H., & Mather, K., (1938). The interrelations of inversions, heterosis and recombination. American Naturalist 72, 447–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sved, J. A., Reed, T. E., & Bodmer, W. F., (1967). The number of balanced polymorphisms that can be maintained by natural selection. Genetics 55, 469–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomson, G., (1977). The effect of a selected locus on linked neutral loci. Genetics 85, 753–788.Google Scholar
Thomson, G. J., & Feldman, M. W., (1974). Population genetics of modifiers of meiotic drive. 1. The solution of a special case and some general implications. Theoretical Populations Biology 4, 446–465.Google Scholar
Trivers, R., (1988). Sex differences in rates of recombination and sexual selection. In The Evolution of Sex (ed. Michod, R. E., and Levin, B. R.), pp. 270–286. Sunderland, Massachussetts: Sinauer Press.Google Scholar
Turelli, M., & Barton, N. H., (1990). Dynamics of polygenic characters under selection. Theoretical Population Biology 38, 1–57.Google Scholar
Turelli, M., & Barton, N. H., (1994). Genetic and statistical analyses of strong selection on polygenic traits: what, me normal? GeneticsGoogle Scholar
Weir, B. S., & Cockerham, C. C., (1977). Two locus theory in population genetics. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Quantitative Genetics (ed. Pollak, E., Kempthorne, O., and Bailey, T. B.), pp. 247–269. Ames, Iowa: Iowa State University Press.Google Scholar
Wills, C. J., (1978). Rank-order selection is capable of maintaining all genetic polymorphisms. Genetics 89, 403–417.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wolfram, S., (1991). Mathematica. New York: Addison Wesley.Google Scholar
Zhivotovsky, L. A., Feldman, M. W., & Christiansen, F. B., (1994). Evolution of recombination among multiple selected loci: a generalized reduction principle. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (USA) 91, 1079–1083.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed