Hostname: page-component-6898cfcb55-th4rj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-11T06:42:22.349Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Heritable variation and heterozygosity under a balance between mutations and stabilizing selection

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 April 2009

Montgomery Slatkin
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

A model of the balance between mutations and stabilizing selection affecting a quantitative character is developed and analysed. This model is essentially a discretized version of the continuum-of-alleles models analysed previously by Kimura, Lande, Turelli and others, and is formally similar to the stepwise mutation models used to interpret electrophoretic data. The complete model cannot be solved even for a haploid species, but there are useful approximations for most parameter values of interest. The ‘house-of-cards’ approximation can be used when selection is strong relative to mutation, and a normal approximation can be used when selection is relatively weak. For intermediate levels of selection a new ‘five-allele’ approximation provides accurate results over a wide range of parameter values. The house-of-cards and five-allele approximations applied to recessive alleles in a diploid population show that, for a given mutation rate, a somewhat larger genetic variance is maintained at equilibrium than in a comparable model of additive alleles. Under directional selection, the increase in genetic variance is largest for alleles of large effect and is much smaller for alleles of intermediate or small effect. At an equilibrium under stabilizing selection, homozygotes would tend to have a higher average fitness than heterozygotes when each mutation has a relatively large effect (the house-of-cards approximation), with the reverse if each mutation has a small effect (the normal approximation).

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1987