Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-8r8nv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-08T14:12:53.486Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Mutation and replication in Ustilago maydis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 April 2009

Robin Holliday
Robin Holliday
Affiliation:
John Innes Institute, Bayfordbury, Hertford, Herts.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

A method is described which makes it possible to detect induced mutations in the pre-existing gene by determining whether both daughter cells of the first division after mutagenic treatment carry the mutation. The method depends on the use of diploid strains of Ustilago maydis which have biochemical markers in both homozygous and heterozygous condition. Cells which are induced to mutate at a homozygous locus will also occasionally undergo mitotic crossing-over. Since only mutant cells are selected, the reciprocal products of such a cross-over will not be detected if the mutation is transmitted to only one daughter cell after treatment. Mutations induced by UV light were examined in three different diploids, and with each, by use of the appropriate selective media and the replica plating technique, it was possible to detect mutant colonies which did consist of the reciprocal products of the exchange. It is deduced that a high proportion of the mutations must occur in the pre-existing gene; and a hypothesis is suggested which attempts to reconcile this conclusion with the current concept of the structure and replication of the gene.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Genetics Research , Volume 3 , Issue 3 , November 1962 , pp. 472 - 486
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1962

References

REFERENCES

Altenburg, E. & Browning, L. S. (1961). The relatively high frequency of whole-body mutations compared with fractionals induced by X-rays in Drosophila sperm. Genetics, 46, 203–212.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Auerbach, C. (1951). Problems in chemical mutagenesis. Cold Spr. Harb. Sym. quant. Biol. 16, 199–213.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beukers, R., Ijlstra, J. & Berends, W. (1960). The effect of ultraviolet light on some components of the nucleic acids. VI. The origin of the UV sensitivity of deoxyribonucleic acid. Rec. Trav. chim. Pays-Bas, 79, 101–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delbruck, M. & Stent, G. S. (1957). On the mechanism of DNA replication, in The Chemical Basis of Heredity. pp. 699–736. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press.Google Scholar
Doudney, C. O. & Haas, F. L. (1959). Mutation induction and macromolecular synthesis in bacteria. Proc. not. Acad. Soc., Wash., 45, 709–722.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Drysdale, R. B. & Peacocke, A. R. (1961). The molecular basis of heredity. Biol. Rev. 36, 537–598.Google Scholar
Fincham, J. R. S. & Day, P. R. (in the press). Fungal Genetics. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Freese, E., Bautz-Freese, E. & Bautz, E. (1961). Hydroxylamine as a mutagenic and inactivating agent. J. mol. Biol. 3, 133–143.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harm, W. (1961). Gene-controlled reactivation of ultraviolet-inactivated bacteriophage. J. cell. comp. Physiol. Suppl. I to Vol. 58, 69–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holliday, R. (1961 a). The genetics of Ustilago maydis. Genet. Res. 2, 204–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holliday, R. (1961 b). Induced mitotic crossing-over in Ustilago maydis. Genet. Res. 2, 231–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holliday, R. (1962). Selection of auxotrophs by inositol starvation in Ustilago maydis. Microbial Genet. Bull. No. 18, 28–30.Google Scholar
James, A. P. (1954). Relative frequencies of sectored and non-sectored mutant colonies in yeast as a function of ultraviolet dose. J. Bact. 67, 237–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaplan, R. W., Winkles, U. & Wolf-Ellmauer, H. (1960). Induction and reversion of c-mutations by irradiation of the extracellular k-phage of Serratia. Nature, Lond., 186, 330–331.Google Scholar
Kimball, R. F., Gaither, N. & Perude, S. W. (1961). Metabolic repair af premutational damage in Paramecium. Int. J. Rod. Biol. 3, 133–147.Google Scholar
Lester, H. E. & Gross, S. R. (1959). Efficient method for selection of auxotrophic mutants of Neurospora. Science, 129, 572.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Levinthal, C. (1959). Bacteriophage genetics, in The Viruses (ed. Burnet, F. M. & Stanley, W. M.). pp. 281–317. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Muller, H. J., Carlson, E. & Schalet, A. (1961). Mutation by alteration of the already existing gene. Genetics, 46, 213–226.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Newcombe, H. B. (1953). The delayed appearance of radiation-induced genetic change in bacteria. Genetics, 38, 134–151.Google Scholar
Ris, H. (1961). Ultrastructure and molecular organization of genetic systems. Canad. J. Genet. Cytol. 3, 95–120.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sager, R. & Ryan, F. J. (1961). Cell Heredity. London: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Stadler, L. J. & Uber, F. M. (1942). Genetic effects of ultraviolet radiation in maize. IV. Comparison of monochromatic radiations. Genetics, 27, 84–118.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Steffensen, D. (1959). A comparative review of the chromosome. In The Structure and Function of the Genetic Elements. Brookhaven Symp. Biol. No. 12, 103–118.Google Scholar
Sunderland, N. & Mcleish, J. (1961). Nucleic acid content and concentration in root cells of higher plants. Exp. Cell Res. 24, 541–554.Google Scholar
Swann, M. M. (1962). Gene replication, ultra-violet sensitivity and the cell cycle. Nature, Lond., 193, 1222–1227.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Taylor, J. H. (1958). The organization and duplication of the genetic material. Proc. Xth Int. Congr. Genet. Montreal, 1, 63–80.Google Scholar
Wacker, A., Dellweg, H. & Weinblum, D. (1960). Strahlenchemische Veränderung der Bakterien-Desoxyribonuclein Säure in vivo. Naturwissenschaften, 47, 477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Witkin, E. M. (1951). Nuclear segregation and the delayed appearance of induced mutants in Escherichia coli. Cold Spr. Harb. Sym. quant. Biol. 16, 357–372.Google Scholar
Witkin, B. M. (1961). Modification of mutagenesis initiated by ultraviolet light through posttreatment of bacteria with basic dyes. J. Cell. comp.Physiol. Suppl. I to vol. 58, 135–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wulff, D. L. & Rupert, C. S. (1962). Disappearance of thymine photodimer in ultraviolet irradiated DNA upon treatment with a photoreactivating enzyme from baker's yeast. Bio-chem. & Biophys. Res. comm. 7, 237–240.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed