Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-54qdv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-10T07:58:21.229Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Two linkage groups in Coprinus lagopus

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 April 2009

P. R. Day  and
G. E. Anderson
P. R. Day
Affiliation:
John Innes Institute, Bayfordbury, Hertford, Herts.
G. E. Anderson
Affiliation:
City of Liverpool College of Technology
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

Sixty-six independently produced markers have been tested for linkage with the A and B mating-type factors. Six loci linked with A and three linked with B were found. Maps of the two linkage groups which include the centromeres were constructed.

Non-identical alleles at two loci, paba-1 and chol-1, were found and crosses between different mutants were used to map the positions of the mutant sites within each locus.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Genetics Research , Volume 2 , Issue 3 , November 1961 , pp. 414 - 423
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1961

References

REFERENCES

Anderson, G. E. (1959). Induced mutants in Coprinus lagopus. (Abstr.) Heredity, 13, 411–412.Google Scholar
Benzer, S. (1955). Fine structure of a genetic region in bacteriophage. Proc. nat. Acad. Sci., Wash., 41, 344–354.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Buller, A. H. R. (1924). Researches on Fungi III. London: Longmans Green & Co.Google Scholar
Catcheside, D. G. (1954). Isolation of nutritional mutants of Neurospora crassa by filtration enrichment. J. gen. Microbiol. 11, 34–36.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Day, P. R. (1959). A cytoplasmically controlled abnormality of the tetrads of Coprinus lagopus. Heredity, 13, 81–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Day, P. R. (1960 a). The structure of the A mating type locus in Coprinus lagopus. Genetics, 45, 641–650.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Day, P. R. (1960 b). Mutations affecting the A mating type locus in Coprinus lagopus. (Abstr.) Heredity, 15, 457.Google Scholar
Emerson, M. R. (1954). Some physiological characteristics of ascospore activation in Neurospora crassa. Plant Physiol. 29, 418–428.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fries, L. (1948). Mutations induced in Coprinus fimetarius (L) by nitrogen mustard. Nature, Lond., 162, 846.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frost, L. C. (1961). Heterogeneity in recombination frequencies in Neurospora crassa. Genet. Res. 2, 43–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, D. (1961). Genetical analysis of methionine suppressors in Coprinus. Genet. Res. 2, 141–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Madelin, M. F. (1956). Studies on the nutrition of Coprinus lagopus Fr., especially as affecting fruiting. Ann. Bot. 20, 307–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mittwoch, U. (1951). Studies in the genetics of some X-ray induced morphological mutants in Coprinus lagopus. J. Genet. 50, 202–205.Google ScholarPubMed
Orton, P. D. (1957). Notes on British agarics 1–5 (observations on the genus Coprinus). Trans. Brit, mycol. Soc. 40, 263–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stadler, D. R. (1956). Heritable factors influencing crossing-over frequency in Neurospora. Microbial Genet. Bull. 13, 32–34.Google Scholar
Swiezynski, K. M. & Day, P. R. (1960 a). Heterokaryon formation in Coprinus lagopus. Genet. Res. 1, 114–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swiezynski, K. M. & Day, P. R. (1960 b). Migration of nuclei in Coprinus lagopus. Genet. Res. 1, 129–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Towe, A. M. (1958). Factors influencing crossing-over in Neurospora. Microbial Genet. Bull. 16, 31–32.Google Scholar
Whitehouse, H. L. K. (1957). Mapping chromosome centromeres from tetratype frequencies. J. Genet. 55, 348–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodward, V. W., De Zeeuw, J. R. & Srb, A. M. (1954). The separation and identification of particular biochemical mutants of Neurospora by differential germination of the conidia followed by filtration and selective plating. Proc. nat. Acad. Sci., Wash., 40, 192–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar