^{page 532 note 1} “Cat. Foss. Nummulitici d'Egitto”: Mem. E. Ac. Sci. Torino, 1854, p. 178.

^{page 533 note 1} Information supplied to the writer by Dr. Hume in August, 1898.

^{page 533 note 2} Mr. G. T. Prior, of the British Museum, informs me that this matrix is not a dolomite, although referred to as such on the manuscript lists accompanying the collection.

^{page 534 note 1} “Zur Geologie Egyptens”: Viert. Nat. Ges. Zurich., vol. xxxi (1886), p. 261.Google Scholar “TJebcr das Tongrian von Cairo (Egypten) ”: ibid., vol. xxxiv (1889), p. 195 and plate of fossils. “Le Ligurien et le Tongrien en Egypte ”: Bull. Soc. Geol. France, ser. HI, vol. xxi (1893), p. 31.

^{page 535 note 1} Desc. Anim. Foss. Nummulitique l'Inde., vol. ii (1854), p. 275, pl. xxiii, figs. 14, 15.Google Scholar

^{page 536 note 1} Journ. Conchyliologie., 1888, pl. xiv, fig. 5, p. 328.Google Scholar

^{page 536 note 2} Bull. Soc. Geol. France., 1851, ser. n, vol. viii, p. 261.Google Scholar

^{page 536 note 3} Palaeontographica, 1883, vol. iii, p. cvii.

^{page 537 note 1} Sud-Bayerns Lethaea Geognostica der Kressenberg, etc., 1863, p. 148, pl. 65i, fig. 13.