No CrossRef data available.
Nearly ten years ago I proposed the term ‘hemera.’ The term is coming into use; but, so far as I am aware, in the majority of cases it is greatly misunderstood. From this cause arise objections as to its use, such objections being based on the misconception that the hemera is a subdivision of a zone. It is nothing of the kind.
page 554 note 1 “Bajocian of the Sherborne District”: Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., 1893, vol. xlix, p. 481.Google Scholar
page 555 note 1 Op. cit., pp. 481, 482.
page 555 note 2 p. 518.
page 557 note 1 Anniversary Address of the President to the Geological Society, Q.J.G.S., vol. li, p. lxxxvii.Google Scholar