Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-7pwfn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-14T09:25:55.557Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Note on Campophyllum flexuosum (Goldfuss)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

D. Hill and
R. K. Jull
D. Hill
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
R. K. Jull
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This note provides photographs of thin sections and cellulose peels prepared from the syntypes figured by Goldfuss (1826) of Cyathophyllum flexuosum Goldfuss, the type species by original designation of Campophyllum Edwards and Haime, 1850.

It is concluded that C. flexuosum is not a disphyllid, and that Campophyllum may be maintained as a genus distinct from Caninia, Caninophyllum, and Palaeosmilia. For the present it is placed alone in the family Campophyllidae Wedekind, 1932.

Information

Type
Articles
Information
Geological Magazine , Volume 102 , Issue 3 , June 1965, pp. 206 - 212
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1965

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Carpentier, A., 1913. Contribution a l'Étude du Carbonifère du Nord de la France. Mém. Soc. géol. Nord, 7, Pt. 2, 458 pp.Google Scholar
Carruthers, R. G., 1908. A Revision of some Carboniferous Corals. Geol. Mag., 45, 20–31, 63–74, 158–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carruthers, R. G., 1909. A Carboniferous Fauna from Nowaja Semlja. Trans. roy. Soc. Edinb., 47, (1), 143–186.Google Scholar
Dehée, R., 1929. Description de la Fauna d'Etroeungt. Mém. Soc. géol. Fr. (NS), No. 11, 63 pp.Google Scholar
Edwards, H. Milne and Haime., J., 1848. Observations sur les Polypiers de la famille des Astreides. C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris, 27, 465–470.Google Scholar
Edwards, H. Milne and Haime., J., 1850. A Monograph of the British Fossil Corals. Part I. Introduction, etc. 1–lxxxv, 1–71, Palaeontogr. Soc. (Mongr.).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, H. Milne and Haime., J., 1851. Monographie des Polypiers fossiles des Terrains paléozoiques. Arch. Mus. Hist. nat. Paris, 5, 1–502.Google Scholar
Frech, F., 1885. Die Korallenfauna des Oberdevons in Deutschland. Z. dtsch. geol. Ges., 37, 21–130.Google Scholar
Goldfuss, G. A., 1826. Petrefacta Germaniae, I. 1–76, Düsseldorf.Google Scholar
Hill, D., 1940. A Monograph of the Carboniferous Rugose Corals of Scotland, Part III, 115–204, Palaeontogr. Soc. (Mongr.).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, D., 1956. Rugosa, in Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology (Moore, R. C., Ed.), Part F, Coelenterata, F233–D324. Lawrence, Kansas.Google Scholar
Lang, W. D., Smith, S., and Thomas, H. D., 1940. Index of Palaeozoic Coral Genera. British Museum (Nat. Hist.).Google Scholar
Lewis, H. P., 1929. On the Avonian Coral Caninophyllum, gen. nov. and C. archiaci (Edwards and Haime). Ann. Mag. nat. Hist. (10), 3, 456–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michelin, H. in Gervais, P., 1840. Astree, Astraea. Dict. Sci. Nat. Paris, supplement I, 481–7.Google Scholar
Neaverson, E., 1929. Faunal Horizons in the Carboniferous Limestone of the Vale of Clwyd. Proc. Lpool geol. Soc. 15, 111–133.Google Scholar
Schindewolf, O. H., 1932. Über Polyparform und Septalapparat der Tetrakorallen. Centralbl. Min. Geol. Palaont. (1932), Abt. B, 464–478.Google Scholar
Schlüter, C., 1889. Anthozoen des rheinischen Mittel-Devon. Abh. geol. Specialkarte Preuss. Thuring. Staat., 8 (4), x + 259–465.Google Scholar
Soshkina, E. D., and Dobrolyubova, T. A., 1962. Order Evenkiellida, pp. 333–9 in Osnovy Palaeontologii (Orlov, Y. A., Ed.) Gubki, Arkheotsiaty, Kishechnopolostnye, Chervi (Spkolov, B. S., Ed.).Google Scholar
Thomson, J. 1883. On the Development and Generic Relation of the Corals of the Carboniferous System of Scotland. Proc. roy. phil. Soc. Glasg., 14, 296–520.Google Scholar
Vaughan, A., 1915. Correlation of Dinantian and Avonian. Quart. J. geol. Soc. Lond., 71, 1–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wedektnd, R., 1921. Beitrage zur Kenntnis Mesophyllen. Palaont. Z. 4, 48–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wedektnd, R., 1922. Zur Kenntnis der Stringophyllen des oberen Mitteldevon. Schr. Ges. Beförd. ges Naturwiss. Marburg. (1921), 1, 1–16.Google Scholar
Wedektnd, R., 1924. Das Mitteldevon der Eifel. Eine biostratigraphische Studie. I. Teil. Die Tetrakorallen des unteren Mitteldevon. Schr. Ges. Beförd, ges. Naturwiss, Marburg, 14, vii + 1–91.Google Scholar
Yü, C. C., 1937. The Fengninian (Lower Carboniferous) Corals of South China. Nat. Res. Inst. China, Mem. Inst. Geol., 14, 1–111.Google Scholar