Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-2dmjx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-08T16:15:58.847Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The function of conodonts

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

J. Priddle
J. Priddle
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology University of Reading Reading RG6 2AJ 22nd December 1973
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Information

Type
Correspondence
Information
Geological Magazine , Volume 111 , Issue 3 , May 1974 , pp. 255 - 257
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1974

References

Boyde, A. 1967. The development of enamel structure. Proc. R. Soc.Med. 60, 923–8.Google ScholarPubMed
Boyde, A. 1969. Correlation of ameloblast size with enamel prism pattern: use of Scanning Electron Microscope to make surface area measurements. Z. Zellforsch. 93 583–93.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boyde, A. & Lester, K. S. 1967. The structure and development of marsupial enamel tubes. Z. Zellforsch. 82, 558–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halstead, L. B. 1969. The Pattern of Vertebrate Evolution. Oliver & Boyd, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Jensen, D. 1966. The hagfish. Scient. Am. 214, 82–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lindström, M. 1964. Conodonts. Elsevier, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Lindström, M. 1972. On the affinities of conodonts. In Rhodes, F. H. T. (Ed.): Conodont paleozoology. Spec. Pap. geol. Soc. Amer. 141.Google Scholar
Lindström, M., McTavish, R. A. & Ziegler, W. 1972. Feinstrukturelle Untersuchungen an Conodonten. 2. Einige Prioniodontidae aus dem Ordovicium Australiens. Geologica et Palaeontologica 6, 33–44.Google Scholar
Lindström, M. & Ziegler, W. 1971. Feinstrukturelle Untersuchungen an Conodonten. 1. Die Überfamilie Panderodontacea. Geologica et Palaeontologica 5, 9–33.Google Scholar
Melton, W. & Scott, H. W. 1972. Conodont animals from the Bear Gulch Limestone, Montana. In Rhodes, F. H. T. (Ed.): Conodont paleozoology. Spec. Pap. geol. Soc. Amer. 141.Google Scholar
Müller, J. von K., & Nogami, Y. 1971. Über den Feinbau der Conodonten. Mem. Fac. Sci. Univ. Kyoto, Ser. Geol. Min. 38, 1–87.Google Scholar
Rhodes, F. H. T. 1954. The zoological affinities of conodonts. Biol. Rev. 29, 419–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, H. 1934. Conodonten-Funde in ursprünglichen Zusammenhang. Paläont. Z. 16, 76–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, H. 1964. In Schmidt, H. & Müller, K. J. Weitere Funde von CondontenGruppen aus dem oberen Karbon des Sauerlandes. Paläont. Z. 38, 105–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ulrich, E. O. & Bassler, R. S. 1927. A classification of the toothlike fossils, conodonts, with descriptions of American Devonian and Mississippian species. Proc. U.S. Nat. Mus. 68 (12), 1–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar