No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
III.—The Cirripede ‘Brachylepas cretacea’, H. Woodward
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 May 2009
Extract
In addition to the valves from Lüneburg herein mentioned, it has been possible to examine the more important of the material described by previous authors, namely: (1) the valve figured by H. Woodward (1868) as Pyrgoma cretacea, and subsequently (1901) as Brachylepas cretacea, now in the British Museum (Natural History), registered I. 14029; (2) the nearly complete capitulum figured as B. oretacea by H. Woodward (1901), in the collection of Dr. A. W. Rowe, of Margate; (3) the valve figured by Marsson (1880) as Pollicipes cancellatus, together with other valves studied by him, now in the Geologisches Landesmuseum of Berlin; (4) the valve figured by Quenstedt (1883) as P. Iœvissimus, now in the University of Tübingen; (5) the valve mentioned by Boehm(1906), in the Geologisches Landesmuseum of Berlin; and (6) a large number of more or less broken carinæ and rostra, with several scuta and terga, obtained from the Chalk of Rügen by Mrs. Agnes Laur, and acquired by the British Museum (Natural History).
Information
- Type
- Original Articles
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1912
References
LIST OF WORKS CONSULTED
Boehm, J. “Zu Brachylepas cretacea, H. Woodward”: Centralbl. f. Min., 1906, pp. 449–450.Google Scholar
Darwin, C. R. A Monograph on the Fossil Lepadidæ, or, Pedunculated Cirripedes of Great Britain: Palæontographical Society, 4to, London, 1851, pp. vi, 88, 5 pls.Google Scholar
Darwin, C. R. A Monograph on the Sub-class Cirripedia, the Balanidæ, Synopsis et Index Systematicus: Ray Society, 8vo, London, 1854, pp. 684, 30 pls.Google Scholar
HÉBERT, Ed. “Tableau des Fossiles de la craie de Meudon, et description de quelques espèces nouvelles”: M ém. Soc. Géol. France, 2e sér vol. v, pp. 345–74, pls. xxvii-ix, 1855.Google Scholar
Lahusen, J. I. “Fossils of the White Chalk of Simbirsk” [in Russian]: Jubilee Volume of the Imperial Russian Mining-Corps Institute, St. Petersburg, 1873, pt. ii, pp. 221–77, pls. iii-vi.Google Scholar
Marsson, Th. “Die Cirripedien und Ostracoden der weissen Schreibkreide der Insel Rügen” : Mitth. naturwiss. Vereine Neu-Vorpommern und Rügen, Jahrg. xii, pp. 1–50, pls. i-iii, 1880.Google Scholar
Nilsson, S. Petrificata Suecana formationis Cretaceæ, descripta et iconibus illustrata. Pars prior, Vertebrata et Mollusca sistens, 1827, pp. viii, 39, 10 pls., fol., Londini Gothorum.Google Scholar
Quenstedt, F. A. Handbuch der Petrefaktenkunde, 3rd ed., text and atlas, 2 vols., 8vo, Tübingen, 1882–1885.Google Scholar
Wolleman, A. “Die Fauna der Lüneburger Kreide”: Abh. k. preuss. geol. Landesanst., N.F., Hft. xxxvii, pp. 129, 7 pls. and atlas, 1902.Google Scholar
Woodward, H. “First Report on the Structure and Classification of the Fossil Crustacea”: Rep. Brit. Assoc. (1865), 1866, pp. 320–2.Google Scholar
Woodward, H. “Contributions to British Fossil Crustacea”: GEOL. MAG., Dec. I, Vol. V, pp. 258–61, Pl. XIV, 1868.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodward, H. British Museum Catalogue of British Fossil Crustacea, with their Synonyms and the Range in Time of each Genus and Order. 8vo, London, 1877, pp. xii, 155.Google Scholar
Woodward, H. “On ‘Pyrgoma cretacea‘, a Cirripede, from the Upper Chalk of Norwich and Margate”: GEOL. MAG., Dec. IV, Vol. VIII, pp. 145–52, Text-figs. 1–3, Pl. VIII, Figs. 1–5, 1901. Erratum, p. 240; additional note, p. 528. [In the author's separates of this paper the words ‘and Margate’ have been deleted from the title, and ‘Norwich’ has been substituted for ‘Margate’ and ‘Thanet’ in the text. T. H. W. ]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodward, H. “Cirripedes from the Trimmingham Chalk and other localities in Norfolk”: GEOL. MAG., Dec. V, Vol. III, pp. 337–53, Text-figures 1–39, 1906.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 2
- Cited by