Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-g96k6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-10T08:29:13.023Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The March-Nar Sea

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

Kenneth Harrison
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In 1836 Rose (Phil. Mag., viii, p. 30) described a series of marine deposits in the Nar Valley, associated with the brick clay of that neighbourhood. Later work revealed that these beds were widely distributed to the south-east and east of King’s Lynn, and were to be correlated with very similar gravels at March and Whittlesey. Further correlation outside this area is uncertain, but following Boswell’s scheme (1932, pp. 72, 75) the March-Nar marine episode may be classed with the well-known estuarine sections at Kirmington, Lines.: moreover, he refers all gravels containing Corbicula (including the Barrington gravels) to this period. The same author regards the uppermost boulder clay at Kirmington as of Upper Purple age, and “apparently not the equivalent…of the Brown boulder clay of Hunstanton”.

Information

Type
Original Articles
Information
Geological Magazine , Volume 72 , Issue 6 , June 1935 , pp. 257 - 263
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1935

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Baden-Powell, D. W. F., Geol. Mag., LXXI, 1934, 193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boswell, P. G. H., Rep. Brit. Assoc., 1932, 75.Google Scholar
Cooper, C. Forster, Biol. Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc., i, 1924, 108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hughes, T. McK., Proc. Geol. Assoc., xxii, 1912, 273.Google Scholar
Hughes, T. McK., The Fenland, 1916, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Jukes-Browne, A. J., Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., xxxv, 1879, 397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kendall, C. E. Y., Journ. Conchol., xiv, 1913, 83.Google Scholar
Kennard, A. S., and Woodward, B. B., Proc. Geol. Assoc., xxxiii, 1922, 104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lamplugh, G. W., Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., xlvii, 1891, 394.Google Scholar
Marr, J. E., Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., lxxv, 1919, 204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marr, J. E., Proc. Prehist. Soc. E. Anglia, iii, 1921, 353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marr, J. E., and King, W. B. R., Geol. Mag., LXV, 1928, 210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mem. Geol. Survey. “Geology of Cambridge,” 1881. “Geology of Holderness,” 1885. “Geology of East Lincolnshire,” 1887. “Geology of South-West Norfolk,” 1893. “Water Supply of Lincolnshire,” 1904. “Geology of Saffron Walden,” 1932.Google Scholar
Prestwich, J., Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., xvii, 1861, 446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reid, C., Submerged Forests, 1913, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Solomon, J. E., Man, xxxi, 1931, 275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solomon, J. E., Proc Geol. Assoc., xliii, 1932, 241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stather, J. W., Proc Yorks. Geol. Soc., xxi, 1929, 151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trimmer, J., Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., x, 1854, 343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woolacott, D., Geol. Mag., LIX, 1922, 64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar