^{page 268 note 1} Callaway, C., Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., vol. xxxiii, 1877. p. 670.Google Scholar

^{page 268 note 2} Lapworth, C., Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., Ser. v, vol. iv, 1879, p. 333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

^{page 268 note 3} Lapworth, C., Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., Ser. v, vol. v, 1880, p. 274.Google Scholar

^{page 268 note 4} Lapworth, C., Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., Ser. v, vol. v, 1880, pp. 164–5, p1. v, figs. 21a, 21b.Google Scholar

^{page 269 note 1} Kjerulf, T., 1865, Veiviser Christ., p. 3, figs. 6a and b.Google Scholar

^{page 269 note 2} Moberg, J. C., and Segerberg, C. O., Medd. Lunds Geol. Fält., Ser. B, No. 2, 1906,Google Scholar Westergård, A. H., Lunds Univ. Årsskr., n.s., pt. ii, vol. v, No. 3, 1909Google Scholar, and Poulsen, C., Danmarks Geol. Undersög, Ser. iv, vol. 1, No. 16, 1922.Google Scholar

^{page 269 note 3} Stubblefield, C. J. and Bulman, O. M. B., Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., vol. lxxxiii, 1927, pp. 111 and 118.Google Scholar

^{page 270 note 1} C. J. Stubblefield and O. M. B. Bulman, op. cit., pp. 110, 111, 116.

^{page 270 note 2} All text-figures in this paper are camera lucida drawings of specimens found in the Shineton Shales—south of the Wrekin, Shropshire—and have been given to the British Museum (Nat. Hist.) S.W. 7. The convention used in numbering the graptolite structures is such that the immediate descendants of one particular budding individual (e.g. III) carry the same numeral (IV, iv, 4).

^{page 271 note 1} Bulman, O. M. B., 1925, Geol. Mag., pp. 50–67, text-figs. 1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and 1927, A Monograph of British Dendroid Graptolites, pt. i, Palaeont. Soc., London.Google Scholar

^{page 272 note 1} This would appear, from my drawing, to originate from the apical portion of the sicula about its junction with the apertural, but since the specimen is damaged in this region and the “apical portion” is completely opaque it is impossible to decide where the apertural portion really begins.

^{page 274 note 1} Kraft, P., “Ontogenetische Entwicklung und Biologie, von Diplograptus u. Monograptus.” Pal. Zeitsch., vol. iii, 1926, p. 223.Google Scholar

^{page 274x note 2} Graptolites are usually figured with the sicular aperture facing downwards, and since the nema forms the proximal end, the right-hand side of the animal is by this convention drawn to appear on the left. The terminology “right-handed” and “right-hand stipe” adopted in this paper is therefore morphologically incorrect but with the conventional drawing-position, this. usage seems less likely to confuse the reader.

^{page 278 note 1} There is no doubt of the specific identity between the English and Swedish material.

^{page 283 note 1} , Lapworth, Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., Ser. v, vol. v, 1880, p. 165, p1. v, figs. 21a, 21b.Google Scholar

^{page 283 note 2} In Mon. Brit. Grapt., Palaeont. Soc. London, pt. ii, 1902, pp. 84–5, it was stated that Lapworth described B. callavei from Mary Dingle. It is likely that the specimen came from this locality, but Lapworth's paper reported the species from Cound Brook—the Shineton Shales of Cound Brook yield no graptolites.Google Scholar

^{page 284 note 1} , Nicholson (Mon. Brit. Grapt., Pal. Soc. London, pt. i, 1872, p. 67) compared. the Dichograptid discus with the “float” of modern Physophoridae, and further quoted Hall's description of Tetragraptus (Craptolithus) alatus in which the discus is prolonged “along the margins of the stipes producing an alation” —a structure homologous with the flange of the Swedish callavei.Google Scholar

^{page 285 note 1} Holm, G., Geol. Fören. Stockh. Förh., vol. xvii, 1895, pp. 332–4, p1. xi, figs. 1–3Google Scholar, and Geol. Mag., 1895, pp. 440–1, p1. xlii, figs. 1–3.Google Scholar