No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Extract
Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.
My book claims that constitutionalism is about constraining the exercise of public power in a legal manner. What it studies are different renderings of this idea and how one can arrive move from one to the next. What is essential to the success of the enterprise is, first, elaborating the relevant ideal types; second, analyzing how the transitions are made from one to the other; and third, taking public law as a way of conceiving of human practice, namely as activity that is essentially amenable to normative guidance and constraint. The people working and thinking in the world of public law use language that betrays ontological commitments to conspicuous entities such as “powers,” “values,” or “conventions.”
Information
- Type
- Book Review
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © 2018 by German Law Journal GbR
References
1 See Somek, Alexander, The Cosmopolitan Constitution 1 (2014).Google Scholar
2 See Pippin, Robert, You Can't Get There from Here: Transition Problems in Hegel's Phenomenology of the Spirit, in The Cambridge Companion to Hegel 52–85 (Frederick C. Beiser ed., 1993).Google Scholar
3 See Loughlin, Martin, The Constitutional Imagination, 78 Mod. L. Rev. 1, 1–25 (2015).Google Scholar
4 For a first round, see 4 Revista Trimestrale di Diritto Publico, 67 (2017) (It.).Google Scholar
5 See Tschorne, Samuel I., Thinking Normatively Without Moralizing? Constitutional Theory—Somek's Style, 19 German L.J. 1519 (2018).Google Scholar
6 See Dworkin, Ronald, Law's Empire (1986).Google Scholar
7 See Pinkard, Terry, Hegel's Phenomenology: The Sociality of Reason 8–9 (1994).Google Scholar
8 See Dani, Marco, Re-imagining the Cosmopolitan Constitution: A Comment on Alexander Somek's The Cosmopolitan Constitution, 19 German L.J. 1543 (2018).Google Scholar
9 See Jellinek, Georg, Allgemeine Staatslehre 386 (3d ed. 1929).Google Scholar
10 See Somek, supra note 1, at 32, 247.Google Scholar
11 For an introductory statement, see Theodor W. Adorno, Vorlesung über Negative Dialektik 16 (2003).Google Scholar
12 See Somek, supra note 1, at 276–79.Google Scholar
13 See Larsen, Signe Rehling, European Exceptionalism? — A Response to Alexander Somek's The Cosmopolitan Constitution, 19 German L.J. 1529 (2018).Google Scholar
14 See Thilo Rensmann, Wertordnung und Verfassung: Das Grundgesetz im Kontext grenzüberschreitender Konstitutionalisierung (2007).Google Scholar
15 In the 1950s and 1960s, the Convention and the European Community must have appeared quite remote, as a side show at best, in national systems. Until very recently, German constitutionalism has been a national project. In fact, Verfassungspatriotismus is the disguise under which national pride was permitted to re-enter Germany. This also explains why the European peer review system has played a highly limited role until recently.Google Scholar
16 See Müller, Jan-Werner, Contesting Democracy: Political Ideas in Twentieth-Century Europe 148–49 (2011).Google Scholar
17 See Moravcik, Andrew, The Origins of Human Rights Regimes: Democratic Delegation in Postwar Europe, 54 Int'l Org. 217–52 (2000).Google Scholar
18 See Schuman, Robert, French Minister of Foreign Affairs, The Schuman Declaration (May 9, 1950), https://europa.eu/european-union/about-eu/symbols/europe-day/schuman-declaration_fr.Google Scholar
19 See Koskenniemi, Martti, The Gentle Civilizer of Nations: The Rise and Fall of International Law 1870–1960 266– 350 (2001).Google Scholar
20 See Weiler, J.H.H., The Transformation of Europe, in The Transformation of Europe: Twenty-Five Years On 1–99 (Miguel Poiares Maduro & Marlene Wind eds., 2017).Google Scholar
21 See Bickerton, Christopher, European Integration: From Nation-States to Member States (2012).Google Scholar
22 See Maduro, Miguel Poiares, We the Court: The European Court of Justice and the European Economic Constitution (1998).Google Scholar
23 See Joerges, Christian & Neyer, Jürgen, From Intergouvernmental Bargaining to Deliberative Processes: The Constitutionalisation of Comitology, 3 Eur. L. J. 272–99 (1997).Google Scholar
24 Or not so. See Brennan, Jason, Against Democracy (2016).Google Scholar
You have Access