Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-2rsb6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-13T03:38:51.774Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Consensual Elements in German Criminal Procedural Law

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2019

Folker Bittmann

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

The aim of German criminal procedural law is not to convict the accused at any cost. Even a guilty party can only be convicted if the criminal procedure is held in accordance with the law. If this is not possible, the German legal system accepts the risk of possibly acquitting a guilty party; it finds this more tolerable than the irregular conviction of the culprit. A criminal procedure seeks the truth. Only on the basis of a judicial conviction of the crime and its culprit may a sentence be imposed. This, though, can only be based on the so-called procedural truth. On the one hand, the past can never be reconstructed precisely; on the other hand, clarification can only be found through legal means and by following designated paths allowed by procedural law. Therefore, further investigation must cease if it is only possible to proceed by violating procedural law.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
German Law Journal , Volume 15 , Issue 1: Special issue - Plea Bargains in Germany , 01 February 2014, pp. 15 - 42
Copyright
Copyright © 2014 by German Law Journal GbR 

References

1 Strafprozessordnung [StPO] [Code of Criminal Procedure], Dec. 22, 2011, Bundesgesetzblatt, Teil I [BGBl. I] 3044, as amended, § 261.Google Scholar

2 Grundgesetz fur die Bundesrepublik Deutschland [Grundgesetz] [GG] [Basic Law], May 23, 1949, BGBl. I. Article 1.Google Scholar

3 Strafprozessordnung [StPO] [Code of Criminal Procedure], Dec. 22, 2011, Bundesgesetzblatt, Teil I [BGBl. I] 3044, as amended, § 244(2).Google Scholar

4 Strafprozessordnung [StPO] [Code of Criminal Procedure], Dec. 22, 2011, Bundesgesetzblatt, Teil I [BGBl. I] 3044, as amended, § 244(3)(6).Google Scholar

5 Löwe/Rosenberg/Kühne, Strafprozeßordnung (Commentary on the German Code of Criminal Procedure), 26. Edition, Berlin 2006, Introduction F, marginal no. 1 and J marginal no. 66, with further references.Google Scholar

6 Strafprozessordnung [StPO] [Code of Criminal Procedure], Dec. 22, 2011, Bundesgesetzblatt, Teil I [BGBl. I] 3044, as amended, § 152(2).Google Scholar

7 Strafprozessordnung [StPO] [Code of Criminal Procedure], Dec. 22, 2011, Bundesgesetzblatt, Teil I [BGBl. I] 3044, as amended, § 153.Google Scholar

8 Strafprozessordnung [StPO] [Code of Criminal Procedure], Dec. 22, 2011, Bundesgesetzblatt, Teil I [BGBl. I] 3044, as amended, §§ 154, 154a.Google Scholar

9 Strafprozessordnung [StPO] [Code of Criminal Procedure], Dec. 22, 2011, Bundesgesetzblatt, Teil I [BGBl. I] 3044, as amended, § 407.Google Scholar

10 Strafprozessordnung [StPO] [Code of Criminal Procedure], Dec. 22, 2011, Bundesgesetzblatt, Teil I [BGBl. I] 3044, as amended, § 59.Google Scholar

11 Strafprozessordnung [StPO] [Code of Criminal Procedure], Dec. 22, 2011, Bundesgesetzblatt, Teil I [BGBl. I] 3044, as amended, § 56.Google Scholar

12 Bundesverfassungsgericht [BVerfG - Federal Constitutional Court] Case No. 2 BvR 1133/86, 9 NSTZ 419, 420 (Jan. 27, 1987) (chamber ruling).Google Scholar

13 Bundesgerichtshof [BGH – Federal Court of Justice], Case No. 4 StR 240/97, 43 BGHSt 195 (Aug. 28, 1997).Google Scholar

14 Bundesgerichtshof [BGH – Federal Court of Justice], Case No. GSSt 1/04, 50 BGHSt 40 (Mar. 3, 2005).Google Scholar

15 Act on Plea Agreements (Verständigungsgesetz).Google Scholar

16 Bundesverfassungsgericht [BVerfG - Federal Constitutional Court], Case No. 2 BvR 2628/10, 2883/10, and 2155/11, (Sept. 3, 2013), http://www.bundesverfassungsgericht.de/entscheidungen.Google Scholar

17 Bundesverfassungsgericht [BVerfG - Federal Constitutional Court], Case No. 3 StR 35/13, Rn 7 (Apr. 15, 2013), available at Juris. At least as far-reaching is Bundesgerichtshof [BGH – Federal Court of Justice], Case No. 2 StR 265/13, Rn. 4 (Nov. 5, 2013).Google Scholar

18 Strafprozessordnung [StPO] [Code of Criminal Procedure], Dec. 22, 2011, Bundesgesetzblatt, Teil I [BGBl. I] 3044, as amended, § 46.Google Scholar

19 Strafprozessordnung [StPO] [Code of Criminal Procedure], Dec. 22, 2011, Bundesgesetzblatt, Teil I [BGBl. I] 3044, as amended, § 202(a), sentence 2.Google Scholar

20 Strafprozessordnung [StPO] [Code of Criminal Procedure], Dec. 22, 2011, Bundesgesetzblatt, Teil I [BGBl. I] 3044, as amended, § 243(4).Google Scholar

21 Strafprozessordnung [StPO] [Code of Criminal Procedure], Dec. 22, 2011, Bundesgesetzblatt, Teil I [BGBl. I] 3044, as amended, § 273(1)(a), sentences 1 and 2.Google Scholar

22 Strafprozessordnung [StPO] [Code of Criminal Procedure], Dec. 22, 2011, Bundesgesetzblatt, Teil I [BGBl. I] 3044, as amended, § 273(1)(a), sentence 3.Google Scholar

23 Strafprozessordnung [StPO] [Code of Criminal Procedure], Dec. 22, 2011, Bundesgesetzblatt, Teil I [BGBl. I] 3044, as amended, § 267(3), sentence 5.Google Scholar

24 Strafprozessordnung [StPO] [Code of Criminal Procedure], Dec. 22, 2011, Bundesgesetzblatt, Teil I [BGBl. I] 3044, as amended, § 257(c)(5).Google Scholar

25 Bundesverfassungsgericht [BVerfG - Federal Constitutional Court], Case No. 2 StR 267/13 (Sept. 24, 2013), available at Juris.Google Scholar

26 Bundesverfassungsgericht [BVerfG - Federal Constitutional Court], Case No. 2 BvR 2628/10, 2883/10, and 2155/11 (Sept. 24, 2013).Google Scholar

27 Strafprozessordnung [StPO] [Code of Criminal Procedure], Dec. 22, 2011, Bundesgesetzblatt, Teil I [BGBl. I] 3044, as amended, § 160(b), sentence 2.Google Scholar

28 Bundesgerichtshof [BGH - Federal Court of Justice], Case No. 1 StR 287/11 Rn. 13 (Nov. 29, 2011).Google Scholar

29 Bundesgerichtshof [BGH - Federal Court of Justice], Case No. 1 StR 287/11 Rn. 12 (Nov. 29, 2011); Bundesgerichtshof [BGH - Federal Court of Justice], Case No. 1 StR 349/11 Rn. 49 (Feb. 22, 2012).Google Scholar

30 Bundesgerichtshof [BGH - Federal Court of Justice], Case No. 4 StR 571/10 Rn. 11 (Apr. 14, 2011).Google Scholar

31 Bundesgerichtshof [BGH - Federal Court of Justice], Case No. 1 StR 274/11 Rn. 3 (Jul. 12, 2011).Google Scholar

32 Bundesgerichtshof [BGH - Federal Court of Justice], Case No. 1 StR 287/11 Rn. 12 (Nov. 29, 2011).Google Scholar

33 Oberlandesgericht [OLG – Higher Regional Court of Nürnberg], Case No. 1 Ws 125/11 H, 1 Ws 126/11 H (Apr. 26, 2011).Google Scholar

34 Strafprozessordnung [StPO] [Code of Criminal Procedure], Dec. 22, 2011, Bundesgesetzblatt, Teil I [BGBl. I] 3044, as amended, § 243(4), sentence 1.Google Scholar

35 Bundesgerichtshof [BGH - Federal Court of Justice], Case No. 3 StR 287/10 (Oct. 5, 2010).Google Scholar

36 Bundesgerichtshof [BGH - Federal Court of Justice], Case No. 1 StR 400/10 (Oct. 20, 2010).Google Scholar

37 Bundesgerichtshof [BGH - Federal Court of Justice], Case No. 1 StR 438/11 Rn. 14 (Feb. 9, 2012).Google Scholar

38 Strafprozessordnung [StPO] [Code of Criminal Procedure], Dec. 22, 2011, Bundesgesetzblatt, Teil I [BGBl. I] 3044, as amended, § 243, sentence 1.Google Scholar

39 Oberlandesgericht Celle [OLG – Higher Regional Court of Celle], Case No. 32 Ss 87/11 Rn. 15 (Aug. 30, 2011).Google Scholar

40 Bundesgerichtshof [BGH - Federal Court of Justice], Case No. 4 StR 571/10 Rn. 11 (Apr. 14, 2011).Google Scholar

41 Bundesgerichtshof [BGH - Federal Court of Justice], Case No. 4 StR 571/10 Rn. 10 (Apr. 14, 2011); see also Bundesgerichtshof [BGH - Federal Court of Justice], Case No. 5 StR 423/12 Rn. 8 (Mar. 6, 2013).Google Scholar

42 Bundesgerichtshof [BGH - Federal Court of Justice], Case No. 3 StR 287/10 (Oct. 5, 2010).Google Scholar

43 Bundesgerichtshof [BGH - Federal Court of Justice], Case No. 1 StR 438/11 Rn. 11 (Feb. 9, 2012); see also Bundesgerichtshof [BGH - Federal Court of Justice], Case No. 1 StR 17/12 Rn. 6 (Mar. 6, 2012).Google Scholar

44 Bundesgerichtshof [BGH - Federal Court of Justice], Case No. 2 StR 455/09 Rn. 8 (June 30, 2010).Google Scholar

45 Bundesgerichtshof [BGH - Federal Court of Justice], Case No. 3 StR 400/11 Rn. 22 (Jan. 10, 2012).Google Scholar

46 Bundesgerichtshof [BGH - Federal Court of Justice], Case No. 5 StR 176/11 Rn. 22 (Jul. 21, 2011).Google Scholar

47 Bundesgerichtshof [BGH - Federal Court of Justice], Case No. 1 StR 170/12 Rn. 13 (Aug. 22, 2012).Google Scholar

48 Beschl. vom 4.3.2010 – 2 KLs 13/09. (Order of 4.3.2010 – 2 KLs 13/09).Google Scholar

49 Bundesgerichtshof [BGH - Federal Court of Justice], Case No. 1 StR 400/10 (Oct. 20, 2010); Bundesgerichtshof [BGH - Federal Court of Justice], Case No. 1 StR 116/11 Rn. 23 (May 5, 2011).Google Scholar

50 Bundesgerichtshof [BGH - Federal Court of Justice], Case No. 4 StR 623/11 Rn. 13 (June 21, 2012).Google Scholar

51 See, for example, Bundesgerichtshof [BGH - Federal Court of Justice], Case No. 2 StR 354/10 (Oct. 6, 2010); Bundesgerichtshof [BGH - Federal Court of Justice], Case No. – 5 StR 423/12 (Mar. 6, 2013).Google Scholar

52 Bundesgerichtshof [BGH - Federal Court of Justice], Case No. 3 StR 426/10 Rn 2 (Feb. 17, 2011).Google Scholar

53 Bundesgerichtshof [BGH - Federal Court of Justice], Case No. 3 StR 359/10 Rn 10 (Sept. 28, 2010); Bundesgerichtshof [BGH - Federal Court of Justice], Case No. 3 StR 426/10 Rn 4 (Feb. 17, 2011); Bundesgerichtshof [BGH - Federal Court of Justice], Case No. 1 StR 52/11 (Mar. 1, 2011); Bundesgerichtshof [BGH - Federal Court of Justice], Case No. 1 StR 60/11 Rn 8 (Mar. 16, 2011); Bundesgerichtshof [BGH - Federal Court of Justice], Case No. 4 StR 623/11 (June 21, 2012).Google Scholar

54 Bundesgerichtshof [BGH - Federal Court of Justice], Case No. 1 StR 345/10 (Jul. 27, 2010); Bundesgerichtshof [BGH - Federal Court of Justice], Case No. 1 StR 208/12 (May 23, 2012).Google Scholar

55 Bundesgerichtshof [BGH - Federal Court of Justice], Case No. 1 StR 347/10 Rn. 9 (Oct. 8, 2010); Bundesgerichtshof [BGH - Federal Court of Justice], Case No. 1 StR 359/10 Rn. 6 (Oct. 11, 2010); Bundesgerichtshof [BGH - Federal Court of Justice], Case No. 1 StR 60/11 Rn. 8 (Mar. 16, 2011).Google Scholar

56 Bundesgerichtshof [BGH - Federal Court of Justice], Case No. 1 StR 400/10 (Oct. 20, 2010).Google Scholar

57 Bundesgerichtshof [BGH - Federal Court of Justice], Case No. 1 StR 458/10, Apr. 14, 2011, Rn. 37.Google Scholar

58 Oberlandesgericht Celle [OLG – Higher Regional Court of Celle], Case No. 32 Ss 87/11 Rn. 22 (Aug. 30, 2011).Google Scholar

59 Bundesgerichtshof [BGH - Federal Court of Justice], Case No. 5 StR 287/1 (Aug. 29, 2011).Google Scholar

60 Bundesgerichtshof [BGH - Federal Court of Justice], Case No. 5 StR 432/11 Rn. 1 (Feb. 7, 2012); Bundesgerichtshof [BGH - Federal Court of Justice], Case No. 1 StR 618/11, Mar. 22, 2012, Rn. 5. The court is not bound by promises made to the prosecution in regard to their conduct, see, for example, Bundesgerichtshof [BGH - Federal Court of Justice], Case No. 5 StR 419/10 Rn. 4 (Oct. 27, 2002).Google Scholar

61 Bundesgerichtshof [BGH - Federal Court of Justice], Case No. 1 StR 400/10 (Oct. 20, 2010); Bundesgerichtshof [BGH - Federal Court of Justice], Case No. 1 StR 458/10 Rn. 38 (Apr. 14, 2011).Google Scholar

62 Bundesgerichtshof [BGH - Federal Court of Justice], Case No. 4 StR 571/10 Rn. 12 (Apr. 14, 2011).Google Scholar

63 Bundesgerichtshof [BGH - Federal Court of Justice], Case No. 1 StR 459/12 Rn. 19 (Jan. 23, 2013) (in concreto rejected).Google Scholar

64 Bundesgerichtshof [BGH - Federal Court of Justice], Case No. 4 StR 623/11 Rn. 16 (June 21, 2012). This case applies these statement to all substantive criminal law, as does Bundesgerichtshof [BGH - Federal Court of Justice], Case No. 1 StR 421/12 (Oct. 25, 2012).Google Scholar

65 Kammergericht [KG – Superior Court of Berlin], Case No. 121 Ss 34/12 (28/12) Rn. 3 (Apr. 23, 2012), http://www.burhoff.de/asp_weitere_beschluesse/inhalte/1892.htm.Google Scholar

66 Bundesgerichtshof [BGH - Federal Court of Justice], Case No. 2 StR 354/10 (Oct. 6, 2010).Google Scholar

67 Kammergericht [KG – Superior Court of Berlin], Case No. 2 Ws 176/11 (Jul. 21, 2011), http://openjur.de/u/285005.html.Google Scholar

68 Bundesgerichtshof [BGH - Federal Court of Justice], Case No. 1 StR 459/12, Jan. 23, 2013, Rn. 25.Google Scholar

69 Bundesgerichtshof [BGH - Federal Court of Justice], Case No. 3 StR 335/11 Rn. 5 (Feb. 7, 2012); Bundesgerichtshof [BGH - Federal Court of Justice], Case No. 3 StR 380/12, Rn. 7 (Sept. 20, 2012); Bundesgerichtshof [BGH - Federal Court of Justice], Case No. 4 StR 170/12 Rn. 15 (Oct. 25, 2012); Oberlandesgericht Celle [OLG – Higher Regional Court of Celle], Case No. 32 Ss 87/11 Rn. 22 (Aug. 30, 2011); see also Bundesgerichtshof [BGH - Federal Court of Justice], Case No. 1 StR 60/11, Mar. 16, 2011, Rn. 7; Bundesgerichtshof [BGH - Federal Court of Justice], Case No. 2 StR 639/11 Rn. 7 (Feb. 29, 2012).Google Scholar

70 Bundesgerichtshof [BGH - Federal Court of Justice], Case No. 1 StR 525/11 Rn. 49 (Feb. 7, 2012).Google Scholar

71 Bundesgerichtshof [BGH - Federal Court of Justice], Case No. 5 StR 171/09 (Oct. 28, 2009); Bundesgerichtshof [BGH - Federal Court of Justice], Case No. 2 StR 222/10, note 8 (June 23, 2010); Bundesgerichtshof [BGH - Federal Court of Justice], Case No. 2 StR 428/10, para. 3 (Mar. 9, 2011); Bundesgerichtshof [BGH - Federal Court of Justice], Case No. 2 StR 383/11, para. 3 (Sept. 22, 2011); Bundesgerichtshof [BGH - Federal Court of Justice], Case No. 3 StR 285/11, para. 7 (Jan. 31, 2012); see also supra note 40.Google Scholar

72 Bundesgerichtshof [BGH - Federal Court of Justice], Case No. 1 StR 208/12, para. 6 f (May 23, 2012); Bundesgerichtshof [BGH - Federal Court of Justice], Case No. 1 StR 459/12, para. 49 f (Jan. 23, 2013).Google Scholar

73 LG Freiburg [Regional Court of Freiburg], Case No. 7 Ns 610 Js 13070/09 (Jan. 18, 2010).Google Scholar

74 Bundesgerichtshof [BGH - Federal Court of Justice], Case No. 5 StR 226/11, para. 3 (June 22, 2011); Bundesgerichtshof [BGH - Federal Court of Justice], Case No. 5 StR 482/11, para. 17 (Jan. 25, 2012).Google Scholar

75 OVG Berlin [Higher Administrative Court of Berlin], Case No. OVG 1 S 159.11, para. 8 (Oct. 21, 2011).Google Scholar

76 Bundesgerichtshof [BGH - Federal Court of Justice], Case No. 3 StR 359/10 (Sept. 28, 2010).Google Scholar

77 OLG Frankfurt am Main [Higher Regional Court of Frankfurt am Main], Case No. 3 Ws 538/10 (Oct. 26, 2010), https://www.jurion.de/Urteile/OLG-Frankfurt_am_Main/2010-10-26/3-Ws-538_10.Google Scholar

78 Bundesgerichtshof [BGH - Federal Court of Justice], Case No. 3 StR 359/10, para. 8 (Sept. 28, 2010).Google Scholar

79 Bundesgerichtshof [BGH - Federal Court of Justice], Case No. 1 StR 52/11 (Mar. 1, 2011).Google Scholar

80 OLG Celle [Higher Regional Court of Celle], Case No. 32 Ss 152/10, para. 23 (Nov. 9, 2010).Google Scholar

81 Bundesgerichtshof [BGH - Federal Court of Justice], Case No. 1 StR 60/11, para. 3 (Mar. 16, 2011).Google Scholar

82 Id. at para. 7.Google Scholar

83 Bundesgerichtshof [BGH - Federal Court of Justice], Case No. 3 StR 426/10, paras. 3 and 7 (Feb. 17, 2011).Google Scholar

84 Bundesgerichtshof [BGH - Federal Court of Justice], Case No. 1 StR 429/09, paras. 6 and 8 (Mar. 15, 2011) (with reference to BGH (GS), Case No. GSSt 1/10, u.a., para. 17 (Jan. 12, 2011)).Google Scholar

85 Bundesgerichtshof [BGH - Federal Court of Justice], Case No. 1 StR 347/10 (Oct. 8, 2010); Bundesgerichtshof [BGH - Federal Court of Justice], Case No. 1 StR 359/10 (Oct. 10, 2011).Google Scholar

86 Bundesgerichtshof [BGH - Federal Court of Justice], Case No. 1 StR 345/10 (July 27, 2010); Bundesgerichtshof [BGH - Federal Court of Justice], Case No. 3 StR 359/10 (Sept. 28, 2010).Google Scholar

87 Bundesgerichtshof [BGH - Federal Court of Justice], Case No. 2 StR 205/10 (Aug. 4, 2010).Google Scholar

88 Id. at note 14; Bundesgerichtshof [BGH - Federal Court of Justice], Case No. 1 StR 349/11, para. 41 (Feb. 22, 2012).Google Scholar

89 Bundesgerichtshof [BGH - Federal Court of Justice], Case No. 2 StR 354/10 (Oct. 6, 2010).Google Scholar

90 Bundesgerichtshof [BGH - Federal Court of Justice], Case No. 3 StR 426/11 (Dec. 20, 2011).Google Scholar

91 Bundesgerichtshof [BGH - Federal Court of Justice], Case No. 5 StR 419/10, para. 4 f (Oct. 27, 2010).Google Scholar

92 Bundesgerichtshof [BGH - Federal Court of Justice], Case No. 3 StR 39/11, para. 12, 5 ff (June 20, 2011).Google Scholar

93 Bundesgerichtshof [BGH - Federal Court of Justice], Case No. 1 StR 458/10, para. 38 (a.E.) (Apr. 14, 2011).Google Scholar

94 Bundesgerichtshof [BGH - Federal Court of Justice], Case No. 1 StR 274/11, para. 3 (July 12, 2011); Bundesgerichtshof [BGH - Federal Court of Justice], Case No. 1 StR 302/11, para. 45 (Nov. 9, 2011); Bundesgerichtshof [BGH - Federal Court of Justice], Case No. 1 StR 103/12, para. 42 (May 22, 2012).Google Scholar

95 Bundesgerichtshof [BGH - Federal Court of Justice], Case No. 4 StR 623/11, para. 13 (June 21, 2012).Google Scholar

96 Bundesgerichtshof [BGH - Federal Court of Justice], Case No. 4 StR 623/11, para. 14 (June 21, 2012); left opened by Bundesgerichtshof [BGH - Federal Court of Justice], Case No. 1 StR 421/12 (Oct. 25, 2012).Google Scholar

97 Bundesgerichtshof [BGH - Federal Court of Justice], Case No. 4 StR 623/11, para. 15 f (June 21, 2012); Bundesgerichtshof [BGH - Federal Court of Justice], Case No. 1 StR 421/12, para. 3 (Oct. 25, 2012).Google Scholar

98 Bundesgerichtshof [BGH - Federal Court of Justice], Case No. 4 StR 537/12, para. 10 (Feb. 28, 2013).Google Scholar

99 See OLG Nürnberg [Higher Regional Court of Nürnberg), Case No. 1 St OLG Ss 292/11 (Feb. 29, 2012).Google Scholar

100 Bundesgerichtshof [BGH - Federal Court of Justice], Case No. 4 StR 537/12, para. 12 (Feb. 28, 2013).Google Scholar

101 Bundesgerichtshof [BGH - Federal Court of Justice], Case No. 5 StR 38/10, para. 10 (Feb. 24, 2010).Google Scholar

102 Bundesgerichtshof [BGH - Federal Court of Justice], Case No. 3 StR 226/10, para. 13 (Aug. 19, 2010); Bundesgerichtshof [BGH - Federal Court of Justice], Case No. 1 StR 33/11, para. 4 ff (Mar. 15, 2011).Google Scholar

103 Bundesgerichtshof [BGH - Federal Court of Justice], Case No. 1 StR 52/11 (Mar. 1, 2011).Google Scholar

104 Bundesgerichtshof [BGH - Federal Court of Justice], Case No. 1 StR 60/11, para. 5 (Mar. 16, 2011); Bundesgerichtshof [BGH - Federal Court of Justice], Case No. 1 StR 349/11, para. 41 (Feb. 22, 2012).Google Scholar

105 Bundesgerichtshof [BGH - Federal Court of Justice], Case No. 5 StR 38/10 (Feb. 24, 2010).Google Scholar

106 OLG Düsseldorf [Higher Regional Court of Düsseldorf], Case No. III-4 RVs 60/10, paras. 12–14 (Oct. 6, 2010).Google Scholar

107 Bundesgerichtshof [BGH - Federal Court of Justice], Case No. 1 StR 33/11, para. 4(ff) (Mar. 15, 2011).Google Scholar

108 Bundesgerichtshof [BGH - Federal Court of Justice], Case No. 1 StR 349/11, paras. 2 and 40(ff) (Feb. 22, 2012).Google Scholar

109 Bundesgerichtshof [BGH - Federal Court of Justice], Case No. 5 StR 174/12, para. 15 (May 23, 2012).Google Scholar

110 Bundesgerichtshof [BGH - Federal Court of Justice], Case No. 3 StR 226/10, para. 4 (Aug. 19, 2010).Google Scholar

111 Bundesgerichtshof [BGH - Federal Court of Justice], Case No. 3 StR 226/10 (Aug. 19, 2010).Google Scholar

112 Bundesgerichtshof [BGH - Federal Court of Justice], Case No. 3 StR 226/10, para. 7 (Aug. 19, 2010).Google Scholar

113 Bundesgerichtshof [BGH - Federal Court of Justice], Case No. 3 StR 226/10, para. 10(f) (Aug. 19, 2010).Google Scholar

114 Bundesgerichtshof [BGH - Federal Court of Justice], Case No. 3 StR 226/10, para. 12(ff) (Aug. 19, 2010),; Bundesgerichtshof [BGH - Federal Court of Justice], Case No. 4 StR 228/10 (Aug. 17, 2010); Bundesgerichtshof [BGH - Federal Court of Justice], Case No. 1 StR 347/10, para. 11 (Sept. 8, 2010); Bundesgerichtshof [BGH - Federal Court of Justice], Case No. 1 StR 443/10 (Aug. 8, 2010) (overturned); Bundesgerichtshof [BGH - Federal Court of Justice], Case No. 1 StR 469/10, para. 3 (Nov. 2, 2010) (overturned); Bundesgerichtshof [BGH - Federal Court of Justice] Case No. 1 StR 449/10, para. 3(ff) (Nov. 3, 101; Bundesgerichtshof [BGH - Federal Court of Justice], Case No. 1 StR 33/11, para. 6 (Mar. 15, 2011).Google Scholar

115 Bundesgerichtshof [BGH - Federal Court of Justice], Case No. 2 StR 590/10, para. 9(f) (May 11, 2011).Google Scholar

116 OLG Celle [Higher Regional Court of Celle], Case No. 32 Ss 87/11, para. 18(ff) (Aug. 30, 2011).Google Scholar

117 Bundesgerichtshof [BGH - Federal Court of Justice], Case No. 4 StR 623/11, para. 17 (June 21, 2012).Google Scholar

118 Bundesgerichtshof [BGH - Federal Court of Justice], Case No. 5 StR 433/10, para. 7(ff) (Oct. 26, 2010).Google Scholar

119 Bundesgerichtshof [BGH - Federal Court of Justice], Case No. 1 StR 64/10 (Apr. 14, 2010).Google Scholar

120 Litwin v. Germany, ECHR App. No. 29090/06 (Nov. 3, 2011), http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/.Google Scholar

121 BGH, Case No. 1 StR 17/12 at para. 6; BGH, Case No. 5 StR 423/12 at para. 15.Google Scholar

122 BGH, Case No. 2 StR 222/10; BGH, Case No. 3 StR 226/10.Google Scholar

123 Bundesgerichtshof [BGH - Federal Court of Justice], Case No. 5 StR 594/10 (Feb. 10, 2011); BGH, Case No. 5 StR 171/09; BGH, Case No. 2 StR 428/10 at para. 3; Bundesgerichtshof [BGH - Federal Court of Justice], Case No. 1 StR 154/11, para. 2 (July 13, 2011); Bundesgerichtshof [BGH - Federal Court of Justice], Case No. 3 StR 203/11, para. 21 (Nov. 17, 2011); BGH, Case No. 3 StR 285/11 at para. 7; BGH, Case No. 2 StR 639/11 at para. 7; BGH, Case No. 3 StR 380/12 at para. 7.Google Scholar

124 BGH, Case No. 5 StR 423/12 at para. 10(ff).Google Scholar

125 BGH, Case No. 3 StR 226/10.Google Scholar

126 Bundesgerichtshof [BGH - Federal Court of Justice], Case No. 3 StR 528/09 (Jan. 13, 2010); BGH, Case No. 3 StR 226/10 at para. 16; BGH, Case No. 1 StR 359/10 at para. 8; BGH, Case No. 1 StR 60/11 at para. 4.Google Scholar

127 BGH, Case No. 1 StR 359/10.Google Scholar

128 BGH, Case No. 4 StR 623/11 at para. 17. See also BGH, Case No. 1 StR 421/12 at para. 4.Google Scholar

129 BGH, Case No. 1 StR 60/11 at para. 3. See also Administrative Fine Proceedings (Richtlinien für das Strafverfahren und Bußgeldverfahren [RiStBV] [Guidelines for Criminal Procedure and Administrative Fine Proceedings] § 127 para. 1.Google Scholar

130 BGH, Case No. 1 StR 116/11, para. 23(f); BGH, Case No. 1 StR 52/11.Google Scholar

131 Bundesgerichtshof [BGH - Federal Court of Justice], Case No. 3 StR 196/11, para. 4(ff) (Sep. 13, 2011).Google Scholar

132 OLG Düsseldorf, Case No. III-4 RVs 60/10 at para. 10(f); KG, Case No. (3) 121 Ss 34/12 (28/12) at para. 2.Google Scholar

133 Bundesgerichtshof [BGH - Federal Court of Justice], Case No. 4 StR 73/10 (June 10, 2010).Google Scholar

134 Bundesgerichtshof [BGH - Federal Court of Justice], Case No. 3 StR 156/09 (Sep. 3, 2009).Google Scholar

135 Bundesgerichtshof [BGH - Federal Court of Justice], Case No. 3 StR 547/08 (Aug. 6, 2009).Google Scholar

136 Bundesgerichtshof [BGH - Federal Court of Justice], Case No. 1 StR 587/09 (Jan. 14, 2010).Google Scholar

137 Bundesgerichtshof [BGH - Federal Court of Justice], Case No. 5 StR 23/10 (Feb. 24, 2010).Google Scholar

138 Bundesgerichtshof [BGH - Federal Court of Justice], Case No. 5 StR 159/10 (Aug. 31, 2010).Google Scholar

139 Compare OVG Berlin, Case No. OVG 1 S 159.11 at para. 6, and OLG Nürnberg, Case No. 1 St OLG Ss 292/11, with OLG Düsseldorf, Case No. III-4 RVs 60/10 at para. 12(f).Google Scholar

140 OLG Nürnberg, Case No. 1 St OLG Ss 292/11.Google Scholar

141 OLG Düsseldorf, Case No. III-4 RVs 60/10 at paras. 12–14. See also Strafprozessordnung [StPO] [Code of Criminal Proecedure] § 257c para. 4, sentence 3.Google Scholar

142 BGH, Case No. 1 StR 52/11; BGH, Case No. 1 StR 60/11 at para. 4; BGH, Case No. 1 StR 302/11 at para. 46.Google Scholar

143 BGH, Case No. 1 StR 60/11 at para. 4.Google Scholar

144 Bundesgerichtshof [BGH - Federal Court of Justice], Case No. 5 StR 411/11, para. 3 (Mar. 13, 2012).Google Scholar

145 Bundesgerichtshof [BGH - Federal Court of Justice], Case No. 1 StR 510/10, para. 2(f) (Oct. 19, 2010).Google Scholar

146 Bundesgerichtshof [BGH - Federal Court of Justice], Case No. 4 StR 472/11, para. 3 (Nov. 8, 2011).Google Scholar

147 Bundesgerichtshof [BGH - Federal Court of Justice], Case No. 5 StR 520/11, para. 1 (Jan. 10, 2012). See Bundesgerichtshof [BGH - Federal Court of Justice], Case No. 1 StR 28/12, para. 3 (Mar. 7, 2012) (for an example of the state of competition between multiple crimes).Google Scholar

148 BGH, Case No. 5 StR 423/12 at para. 143.Google Scholar

149 Bundesgerichtshof [BGH - Federal Court of Justice], Case No. 4 StR 620/09 (Feb. 2, 2010).Google Scholar

150 Bundesgerichtshof [BGH - Federal Court of Justice], Case No. 2 StR 86/11 (Apr. 14, 2011).Google Scholar

151 Bundesgerichtshof [BGH - Federal Court of Justice], Case No. 2 StR 16/10 (Feb. 17, 2010).Google Scholar

152 Bundesgerichtshof [BGH - Federal Court of Justice], Case No. 2 StR 371/10, para. 4(ff) (Sep. 29, 2010); BGH, Case No. 2 StR 16/10; Bundesgerichtshof [BGH - Federal Court of Justice], Case No. 5 StR 419/10 (Oct. 27, 2010); Oberlandesgericht Frankfurt am Main [Higher Regional Court of Frankfurt am Main], Case No. 3 Ws 141/10 (Feb. 23, 2010), http://www.lareda.hessenrecht.hessen.de/.Google Scholar

153 BGH, Case No. 1 StR 359/10 at para. 7; Oberlandesgericht Celle [OLG Celle - Higher Regional Court of Celle], Case No. 1 Ws 381/11 (Sep. 27, 2011), http://www.rechtsprechung.niedersachsen.de/.Google Scholar

154 BGH, Case No. 1 StR 170/12 at para. 8(ff); OLG Düsseldorf, Case No. III-4 RVs 60/10 at para. 17; OLG Celle, Case No. 1 Ws 381/11 at para. 13.Google Scholar

155 OLG Celle, Case No. 1 Ws 381/11 at para. 16.Google Scholar

156 Bundesverwaltungsgericht [BVerwG - Federal Administrative Court] Case No. 2 BvR 1464/11 (Mar. 5, 2012), http://www.bundesverfassungsgericht.de/. See also Oberlandesgericht Zweibrücken [Higher Regional Court of Zweibrücken], Case No. 1 Ws 169/12, para. 10(ff) (July 31, 2012).Google Scholar

157 OLG Celle, Case No. 1 Ws 381/11 at paras. 10, 22(ff). The Federal Constitutional Court requires this.Google Scholar

158 Leaving open BGH, Case No. 5 StR 419/10 at para. 5, as promises by the prosecution only in regard to their own application neither are an evasion of § 257c German Code of Criminal Procedure nor likely suited to create confidence in an identical judicial decision.Google Scholar

159 Bundesgerichtshof [BGH - Federal Court of Justice], Case No. 3 StR 12/13, para. 1 (Feb. 5, 2013).Google Scholar

160 Bundesgerichtshof [BGH - Federal Court of Justice], Case No. 4 StR 637/09 (Apr. 1, 2010).Google Scholar

161 Oberlandesgericht Frankfurt am Main [Higher Regional Court of Frankfurt am Main], Case No. 3 Ws 538/10 (Oct. 26, 2010), http://www.lareda.hessenrecht.hessen.de/.Google Scholar

162 Bundesgerichtshof [BGH - Federal Court of Justice], Case No. 2 StR 31/10 (Mar. 31, 2010) (as already in a main trial ended before the Act on Plea Agreements came into force: Bundesgerichtshof [BGH - Federal Court of Justice], Case No. 2 StR 441/09 (Oct. 28, 2009).Google Scholar

163 Leaving open BGH, Case No. 5 StR 419/10.Google Scholar

164 The Second Criminal Panel of the High Court of Justice therefore voiced doubts on whether a violation of § 257c of the German Code of Criminal Procedure can be contested by a party, who consciously took part in such an agreement and even condoned an incorrect recording. BGH, Case No. 2 StR 205/10.Google Scholar

165 Bundesgerichtshof [BGH - Federal Court of Justice], Case No. 4 StR 99/12, para. 9 (Dec. 13, 2012). See also BGH, Case No. 1 StR 28/12 at paras. 3, 5.Google Scholar

166 Bundesgerichtshof [BGH - Federal Court of Justice], Case No. 2 StR 277/12, para. 4 (Aug. 21, 2012) (leaving open BGH, Case No. 5 StR 159/10 at paras. 2, 6).Google Scholar

167 BGH, Case No. 2 StR 590/10 at para. 11(ff).Google Scholar

168 Bundesgerichtshof [BGH - Federal Court of Justice], Case No. 1 StR 3/10 (Feb. 4, 2010).Google Scholar

169 Bundesgerichtshof [BGH - Federal Court of Justice], Case No. 5 StR 74/10 (Mar. 25, 2010).Google Scholar

170 BGH, Case No. 4 StR 620/10.Google Scholar

171 Bundesgerichtshof [BGH - Federal Court of Justice], Case No. 3 StR 372/09 (Oct. 22, 2009).Google Scholar

172 Bundesgerichtshof [BGH - Federal Court of Justice], Case No. 4 StR 445/09 (Nov. 3, 2009).Google Scholar

173 BGH, Case No. 3 StR 226/10 at para. 15(ff); BGH, Case No. 5 StR 423/12 at para. 12.Google Scholar

174 BGH, Case No. 1 StR 400/10 at para. II(3).Google Scholar

175 BGH, Case No. 1 StR 359/10 at para. 8.Google Scholar

176 BGH, Case No. 5 StR 423/12 at paras. 16(ff), 18 (especially para. 18).Google Scholar