1 Gesetz zur Zahlbarmachung von Renten aus Beschäftigungen in einem Ghetto [ZRBG] [German Pensions for Work in Ghettos], June 20, 2002, BGBl. I at 2074, available at http://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/bundesrecht/zrbg/gesamt.pdf.Google Scholar

2 Mainly by the Deutsche Rentenversicherung (German statutory pension insurance scheme).Google Scholar

3 Ernst Féaux De la Croix, Vom Unrecht zur Entschädigung: Der Weg des Entschädigungsrechts, in Die Wiedergutmachung Nationalsozialistischen Unrechts Durch die Bundesrepublik Deutschland 1, 4 (Ernst Féaux La Croix & Helmut Rumpf eds., 1985).Google Scholar

4 Jelinek, Yeshayahu A., Israel und die Anfänge der Shilumim, in Wiedergutmachung in der Bundesrepublik 119, 128 (Ludolf Herbst & Constantin Goschler eds., 1989).Google Scholar

5 Brunner, José, Norbert Frei & Constantin Goschler, Komplizierte Lernprozesse—Zur Geschichte und Aktualität der Wiedergutmachung, in Die Praxis der Wiedergutmachung: Geschichte, Erfahrung und Wirkung in Deutschland und Israel 9, 16 (Norbert Frei, José Brunner & Constantin Goschler eds., 2009).Google Scholar

6 Buschbom, Helmut, Die völkerrechtlichen und staatsrechtlichen Maßnahmen zur Beseitigung des im Namen des Deutschen Reiches verübten nationalsozialistischen Unrechts, in Das Bundesrückerstattungsgesetz 1, 52 (Friedrich Biella et al eds., 1981); Israeli Foreign Office, Israel's Claims Against Germany: The German Economic Background (1951); Letter to Felix Eliezer Shinnar, (Fall 1951) (on file with Israeli State Archives, Foreign Office, 2417/3) (presenting the position of the Israeli government).Google Scholar

7 The Bundesentschädigungsgesetz were a series of laws passed in the 1950s in West Germany regulating the restitution of lost property and the payment of damages to victims of the Nazi persecutions. Bundesentschädigungsgesetz [BEG] [Federal Compensation Law], Sept. 18, 1953 (providing for retroactive affect). The BEG was intended to provide a “claim to compensation” to a defined group of “victim[s] of National Socialist persecution”—“persecutees”—who, “because of political opposition to National Socialism, or because of race, religion or ideology, [were] persecuted by National Socialist oppressive measures and, in consequence thereof,” thus “suffered loss of life, damage to limb or health, liberty, property, possessions, or vocational or economic pursuits.” Id. 1, § 1(1). Institute of Jewish Affairs, The (West German) Federal Compensation Law (BEG) and Its Implementary Regulations 8 (1957).Google Scholar

8 Cohen, Daniel, Unfaire Prozeßführung, 1965 Zeitschrift für Recht und Rechnungswesen [RwZ] 530.Google Scholar

9 Meyer, Kristina & Spernol, Boris, Wiedergutmachung in Düsseldorf, eine statistische Bilanz, in Die Praxis Der Wiedergutmachung 690 (2009).Google Scholar

10 Hebenstiert, Richard, Sonderfonds nach Art. V BEG Schlussgestz, Das Bundesentschädigungsgesetz, in Das Bundesentschädigungsgesetz 690 (Hans Giessler, Otto Gnirs & Richard Hebenstreit eds., 1983).Google Scholar

11 During the deliberations in regard to the BEG-Schlussgesetz, the parliamentarians held a long discussion regarding the scope of the financial costs due to this legislation process. See Erich Blessin & Hans Giessler, Bundesentschädigungsschlussgesetz: Kommentar zu der Neufassung des Bundesentschadigungsgesetzes 216 (1967).Google Scholar

12 Jan Robert von Renesse, (Zu) Späte Gerechtigkeit für Ghettoarbeiter?, 2008 Zeitschrift für Rechtspolitik [ZRP] 18.Google Scholar

13 Beck, C.H., Book Review, 1999 Neue Zeitschrift für Sozialrecht [NZS] 25, 26 (reviewing Verfassung, Theorie und Praxis des Sozialstaats (Franz Ruland et al. eds., 1998)).Google Scholar

14 Unger, Michal, The Last Ghetto: Life in the Lodz Ghetto, 1940–1944 115 (1995).Google Scholar

15 3 Dokumenty i materiały do dziejów okupacji niemieckiej w Polsce, [3 Getto łódzkie] 316 (A. Eisenbach ed., 1946).Google Scholar

16 Trunk, Isaiah, Ghetto Lodz: A Historical and Sociological Study, Including Documents, Maps and Tables 514 (1962).Google Scholar

17 Glombik, Manfred, Das Ghettorentengesetz, Die Rentenversicherung: Organ für den Bundesverband der Rentenberater e.V. 204, July 7, 2011, http://www.rentenberater.de/docs/dierv/RV_Heft_07_2011.pdf.Google Scholar

18 The Wannsee Conference was a meeting of senior officials of Nazi Germany, held in the Berlin suburb of Wannsee on 20 January 1942. The purpose of the conference was to ensure the cooperation of administrative leaders of various government departments in the implementation of the final solution to the Jewish question, whereby most of the Jews of German-occupied Europe would be deported to Poland and exterminated.Google Scholar

19 Kirchberger, Petra, Die Stellung der Juden in der deutschen Rentenversicherung, in Sozialpolitik und Judenvernichtung: gibt es eine Ökonomie der Endlösung? 111, 121 (Aly Götz ed., 1987).Google Scholar

20 For a collective and detailed survey of the infringements of the civil rights of the Jews, see Das Sonderrecht für die Juden im NS-Staat 408 (Joseph Walk ed., 1996).Google Scholar

21 Id.; see also Jochen August, Herrenmensch und Arbeitsvölker: ausländische Arbeiter und Deutsche 1939–1945 (1986).Google Scholar

22 Fremdrentengesetz [FRG] [Foreign Pensions Law], Feb. 25, 1960, BGBl. I at 3024.Google Scholar

23 Gesetz zur Regelung der Wiedergutmachung nationalsozialistischen Unrechts in der Sozialversicherung [WGSVG] [Law Regulating the Restitution of National Socialist Injustice in the Social Security], Dec. 22, 1970, BGBl. I at 1846.Google Scholar

24 FRG, supra note 22, BGBl. I at 3024, art. 17b. (“an einen nichtdeutschen Träger der gesetzlichen Rentenversicherung und einen deutschen Träger der gesetzlichen Rentenversicherung, die bei Eintritt des Versicherungsfalles wie nach den Vorschriften des Reichversicherungsgesetzes entrichtete Beiträge zu behandeln hatte.“).Google Scholar

25 For the German Jewish Holocaust survivors, other social security arrangements were made, similar to the arrangements made with the Volksdeutsche and other special legal groups who had legally binding relationships with a social security institution.Google Scholar

26 For a comprehensive review of the issue of German social security in respect to the export of German social benefits under the Reichversicherungsgesetz, see Felipe Temming, Unbegrenzter Rentenexport und die Berücksichtigung von Reichsgebietsbeitragszeiten zugunsten von Unionsbürgern, 2011 Zeitschrift für Europäisches Sozial- und Arbeitsrecht [ZESAR] 117.Google Scholar

27 WGSVG, supra note 23, BGBl. I at 1846, art. 20.Google Scholar

28 Bundessozialgericht [BSG - Federal Social Court], Case No. 5 RJ 66/95, June 18, 1997, 80 BSGE 250.Google Scholar

29 Jan Robert von Renesse, Wiedergutmachung fünf vor zwölf—Die Sozialgerichtsbarkeit und die Rentenansprüche jüdischer Ghettoübelebender, 42 NJW 3037 (2008).Google Scholar

30 Zarusky, Jürgen, Hindernislauf für Holocaustüberlebende, Das “Ghettogesetz” und seine Anwendung, 47 Die Tribüne 155 (2008).Google Scholar

31 Bundessozialgericht [BSG - Federal Social Court], Case No. B 13 RJ 83/98 R, Mar. 10, 1999, 1999 NZS 405.Google Scholar

32 Ulrike Pletscher, “Ghetto-Rente“—Markstein in der Geschichte der Entschädigung nationalsozialistischen Unrechts, 2011 Die Sozialgerichtsbarkeit [SGb] 429.Google Scholar

33 Gesetzentwurf eines Gesetzes zur Zahlbarmachung von Renten aus Beschäftigung in einem Ghetto und zur Änderung des Sechsten Buches Sozialgesetzbuch [Draft Legislation regarding the conditions for making pensions payable on the basis of employment in a ghetto and the amendment of the German Code of Social Law], Deutzcher Bundestag: Drucksachen [BT Drs] 14/8583; see also Deutzcher Bundestag: Plenarprotokoll 14/233, at 23279. Already during deliberations, the members of parliament were fully aware of the complexity of the matter and of the future implications of the legislation concerning the export of social benefits to non- Germans under the existing social security law. See id. at 23281.Google Scholar

34 See BT Drs, supra note 33, at 14/8583, 14/8823.Google Scholar

35 ZRGB, BGBl. I at 2074.Google Scholar

36 Ulrich Sartorius & Thomas Bubeck, Sozialrecht in der arbeitsrechtlichen und familienrechtlichen Praxis 74 (2004).Google Scholar

37 Bundesverfassungsgericht [BVerfG - Federal Constitutional Court], Case No. 1 BvR 809/95, Dec. 30, 1999, 2000 Neue Zeitschrift für Arbeitsrecht [NZA] 391.Google Scholar

38 Hans Dieter Braun, Sozialversicherungsrecht und sonstige Bereiche des Sozialrechts 348 (2005).Google Scholar

39 See Gesetz zur Regelung der Wiedergutmachung nationalsozialistischen Unrechts in der Sozialversicherung [WGSVG], BGBl. I at 1846, art. 19 (recognizing the legal rights of those deported under Bundesvertriebenengesetz [BVFG] Article 1(2)(1), and the equalization of the rights of persecuted persons under the BEG and deportees under WGSVG Article 20).Google Scholar

40 FRG, supra note 22, BGBl. at 93, 94.Google Scholar

41 BT Drs, supra note 33, at 14/8823.Google Scholar

42 Id. at 15/1290.Google Scholar

43 Id. at 15/1475.Google Scholar

44 Committee of Labor, Welfare and Health, Israeli Knesset, Mtg. Mins. No. 512, at 8 (Nov. 15, 2005).Google Scholar

45 Letter From Ulla Schmidt, Member of the German Parliament, to the United States Congress (Sep. 27, 2004), available at http://waxman.house.gov/sites/waxman.house.gov/files/Response_from_German_Minister.pdf.Google Scholar

46 Walter Brunn & Richard Hebenstreit, Bundesentschädigungsgesetz (BEG-Schlussgesetz) und Rechtsverordnungen Kommentar 4 (1965).Google Scholar

47 Bundesgerichtshof [BGH - Federal High Court of Justice], Case No. IV ZR 140/56, Sep. 26, 1956, 1956 NJW 1755; Oberlandesgericht Frankfurt [OLG Frankfurt - Frankfurt Court of Appeal], 1960 RzW 495.Google Scholar

48 See Bundessozialgericht [BSG - Federal Social Court], Case No. 13 RJ 67/91, May 23, 1995, 1996 Monatsschrift für Detsches Recht [MDR] 618, 618–19 (debating the legal scope of the FRG regarding workers not of German nationality).Google Scholar

49 Ulrich Freudenberg, §87, in 5 juris PraxisKommentar: Gesetzliche Krankenversicherung (Rainer Schlegel & Thomas Voelzke eds., 2011); Bundessozialgericht [BSG - Federal Social Court] Case No B 5 R 26/08 R, June 3, 2009, 103 BSGE 220.Google Scholar

50 For a detailed legal discussion of the need to conduct historical studies in order to receive a clearer picture of the historical-legal situation, see Bundesgerichtshof [BGH - Federal High Court of Justice], Case No. B 4 R 29/06 R, Dec. 14, 2006, 98 BSGE 48.Google Scholar

51 Lehnstaedt, Stephan, Ghetto—“Bilder”: Historische Aussagen in Urteilen der Sozialgerichtsbarkeit, in Ghettorenten, Entschädigungspolitik, Rechtsprechung und Historische Forschung 89, 90 (Jürgen Zarusky ed., 2010).Google Scholar

52 BT Drs, supra note 33, at 16/5720.Google Scholar

53 Kallmayer, Sonja, Sozialrecht im Blickpunkt—Essener Sozialgerichtsforum: Ghettoarbeit und Rentenanspruch, Tagungsbericht, 2012 NZS 618, 619.Google Scholar

54 BT Drs, supra note 33, at 14/8823.Google Scholar

55 Arnold Lehmann-Richter, Auf der Suche nach den Grenzen der Wiedergutmachung: Die Rechtsprechung zur Entschädigung für Opfer der nationalsozialistischen Verfolgung 286 (2007).Google Scholar

56 Bundessozialgericht [BSG - Federal Social Court], Case No. 13 RJ 67/91, May 23, 1995, 1996 Monatsschrift für Detsches Recht [MDR] 618, 618–19.Google Scholar

57 Bundessozialgericht [BSG - Federal Social Court], Case No. 5 RJ 66/95, June 18, 1997, 80 BSGE 250.Google Scholar

58 See Bundessozialgericht [BSG - Federal Social Court], Case No. 3 RK 86/59, Aug. 29, 1963, 20 BSGE 6; Bundessozialgericht [BSG - Federal Social Court], Case No. 12 RK 26/72, July 31, 1974, 38 BSGE 53; Bundessozialgericht [BSG - Federal Social Court], Case No. 12 RK 63/79, May 27, 1981, 1981 MDR 1052.Google Scholar

59 See Bundessozialgericht [BSG - Federal Social Court], Case No. 3 RK 2/56, Dec. 13, 1960, 13 BSGE 196.Google Scholar

60 See Bundessozialgericht [BSG - Federal Social Court], Case No. 1 RA 83/78, Oct. 4, 1979, 49 BSGE 63, available at https://www.jurion.de/de/document/show/0:85482,0/.Google Scholar

61 Bundessozialgericht [BSG - Federal Social Court], Case No. B 5 RJ 48/98 R, April 21, 1999, 1999 NJW 3143.Google Scholar

62 Bundessozialgericht [BSG - Federal Social Court], Case No. B 13 RJ 75/98 R, July 14, 1999, 1999 Sozialgesetzbuch (SGb) 557, ¶ 6 (1999).Google Scholar

63 BT-Drs, supra note 33, at 16/10334, 4 (providing a decision and recommendation report by the Committee on Employment and Social Affairs).Google Scholar

64 Joswig, Friedrich, Die Gewährung von Altersrenten aus der gesetzlichen Rentenversicherung an ehemalige Ghettoarbeiter, 61 NJW 3040, 3041 (2008).Google Scholar

65 Freudenberg, Ulrich, Beschäftigung gegen Entgelt im Rahmen von Ghettorenten, in Aktuelle Fragen des Sozialrechts 131, 133 (Ralf Thomas Bausch, Günter Krings & Rainer Schlegel eds., 2010).Google Scholar

66 See Bundessozialgericht [BSG - Federal Social Court], Case No. B 13 RJ 34/04 R, May 3, 2005, 94 BSGE 294.Google Scholar

67 Dwertmann, Eva, Zeitspiele. Zur späten Entschädigung ehemaliger Ghettoarbeiter, in Die Praxis der Wiedergutmachung, supra note 5, at 635.Google Scholar

68 Compare Bundessozialgericht [BSG - Federal Social Court], Case No. B 13 R 28/06 R, July 26, 2007, 99 BSGE 35, with Bundessozialgericht [BSG - Federal Social Court], Case No. B 4 R 29/06 R, Dec. 14, 2006, 98 BSGE 48.Google Scholar

69 For the intermediate decision of the Bundessozialgericht [BSG - Federal Social Court], see Case No. B 4 R 85/06 R, Dec. 20, 2007, available at https://www.jurion.de/de/document/show/0:3346513/?q=b+4+r+85%2F06+r&sort=1.Google Scholar

70 For the decision of the Large Senate, see Bundessozialgericht [BSG - Federal Social Court], Case No. GS 1/08, Dec. 12, 2008, 102 BSGE 166.Google Scholar

71 Bundessozialgericht [BSG - Federal Social Court], Case No. B 13 R 81/08 R, June 2, 2009, 103 BSGE 190, 27–28.Google Scholar

72 Bundessozialgericht [BSG - Federal Social Court], Case No. B 5 R 26/08 R, June 3, 2009, 103 BSGE 220, 24–25.Google Scholar

73 Id. 24, 35, and 70.Google Scholar

74 Goschler, Constantin, Ghettorenten und Zwangsarbeiterentschädigung, in Ghettorenten, supra note 51, at 101.Google Scholar

75 See Meyer, & Spernol, , supra note 9, at 695.Google Scholar

76 See Prague Holocaust Era Assets Conference Proceedings, June 26–30, 2009, http://www.holocausteraassets.eu/en/conference-proceedings/.Google Scholar

77 See Declaration, Holocaust Era Assets Conference, Special Session on Caring for Victims of Nazism and Their Legacy 15, 16, June 19, 2009, http://www.holocausteraassets.eu/program/conference-proceedings/declarations/ (click on Expert Conclusions).Google Scholar

78 See Bundessozialgericht [BSG - Federal Social Court], Case No. B 4 R 29/06 R, Dec. 14, 2006, 98 BSGE 48.Google Scholar

79 Id. 116.Google Scholar

80 von Renesse, supra note 29, at 3038.Google Scholar

81 Société Nationale Industrielle Aérospatiale v. District Court, 482 U.S. 522, 530 (1987).Google Scholar

82 See Colin A. Underwood & Adam Katz, The Hague Convention on the Taking of Evidence Abroad in Civil Commercial Matters, Proskauer on Internatinoal Litigation and Arbitration: Managing, Resolving, and Avoiding Cross-Border Business or Regulatory Disputes, http://www.proskauerguide.com/litigation/13/II (last visited Aug. 25, 2013).Google Scholar

83 Gesetz über die Konsularbeamten, ihre Aufgaben und Befugnisse [Act on the Powers and Performance of Duties of Consular Officers], Sept. 11, 1974, BGBl. I at 2317.Google Scholar

84 The North German Confederation (Norddeutscher Bund) was a federation of 22 independent states of northern Germany, with nearly 30 million inhabitants. It was the first modern German nation state and the basis for the later German Empire (1870/1871), when several south German states, such as Bavaria, joined.Google Scholar

85 Möhlenbruch, Rudolf, “Gerichtstage” in Israel—Zur Hoheits- Gerichtsgewalt deutscher Sozialgerichte im Ausland, 2011 NZS 417, 419.Google Scholar

86 See Act on the Powers and Performance of Duties of Consular Officers, supra note 83, at 2317.Google Scholar

87 See Commission Regulation 44/2001, Jurisdiction and the Recognition and Enforcement of Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters, 2000 O.J. (L 12) 1.Google Scholar

88 The first dated 5 December 2006, the second 13 February 2007. See Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen [LSG Nordrhein-Westfalen - Social Court of North Rhine-Westphalia], Case No. L 8 R 239/07, December 3, 2008, 2012 Praxis des Internationalen Privat- und Verfahrensrechts (IPRax) 243–49, ¶¶ 15, 26.Google Scholar

89 See Bundessozialgericht [BSG - Federal Social Court], Case No. B 9a VG 7/07 B, June 4, 2007, https://sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/sgb/esgb/show.php?modul=esgb&id=63731.Google Scholar

90 See Bundesverfassungsgericht [BVerfG - Federal Constitutional Court], Case No. 2 BvR 1613/07, Sept. 27, 2007, 2008 Neue Zeitschrift Für Verwaltungsrecht [NVwZ] 418.Google Scholar

91 Protocol No. 213, Labor, Social Affairs and Health Committee, Feb. 8, 2010, available at http://www.knesset.gov.il/protocols/heb/protocol_search.aspx (Isr.).Google Scholar

92 By judgments given on 2 and 3 June 2009 the Federal Social Court considerably abated the characteristic requirements for employment at one's own will and remuneration. See Bundessozialgericht [BSG - Federal Social Court], Case No. B 5 R 26/08 R, June 3, 2009, 103 BSGE 220; Bundessozialgericht [BSG - Federal Social Court], Case No. B 13 R 81/08 R, June 2, 2009, 103 BSGE 190.Google Scholar

93 See Bundessozialgericht [BSG - Federal Social Court], Case No. 5 RJ 66/95, June 18, 1997, 80 BSGE 250.Google Scholar

94 See Bundessozialgericht [BSG - Federal Social Court], Case No. B 5 R 26/08 R, June 3, 2009, 103 BSGE 220; Bundessozialgericht [BSG - Federal Social Court], Case No. B 13 R 81/08 R, June 2, 2009, 103 BSGE 190.Google Scholar

95 Binne, Wolfgang & Schnell, Christoph, Die Rechtsprechung zum Gesetz zur Zahlbarmachung von Renten aus Beschäftigungen in einem Ghetto (ZRBG) und die Umsetzung durch die Rentenversicherung, 2011 Deutsche Rentenversicherung 12, 21.Google Scholar

96 Sozialgesetzbuch [SGB – Social Code], Jul. 23, 2004, BGBl. at 1842, § 44 (revoking the rejection by the pension insurer with respect to the recognition of contribution periods pursuant to ZRBG, the Law regarding the conditions for making pensions payable on the basis of employment in a ghetto or an application leads to a pension entitlement).Google Scholar

97 Payments from Germany; German Social Security, Claims Conference: The Conference on Jewish Material Claims Against Germany, http://www.claims-conference.de/index.php?id=28 (last visited August 30, 2013).Google Scholar

98 See Bundessozialgericht [BSG - Federal Social Court], Case No. B 5 R 38/11 R, February 8, 2012, 2012 NJW 2139, 16–17.Google Scholar

99 Id. Google Scholar

100 Dankelmann, Helmut, BSG: Keine über die Frist des Art. 44(4) SGB X hinausgehenden Zahlungen für Empfänger von Ghettorenten zulässig, 2012 Fachdienst Sozialversicherungsrecht.Google Scholar

101 See Bundessozialgericht [BSG - Federal Social Court], Case No. B 13 R 40/11 R, Feb. 7, 2012, 2012 NJW 2908, 27–28.Google Scholar

102 See August, supra note 21.Google Scholar

103 See Bundessozialgericht [BSG - Federal Social Court], Case No. B 13 R 20/10 R, April 19, 2011, 26, available at https://www.jurion.de/de/document/show/0:4429092/?q=B+13+R+20%2F10+R&sort=1.Google Scholar

104 BT-Drs, supra note 33, 17/6648 at 2.Google Scholar

105 BT-Drs, supra note 33, at 17/10094.Google Scholar

106 See Bundessozialgericht [BSG - Federal Social Court], Case No. 5 RJ 66/95, June 18, 1997, 80 BSGE 250.Google Scholar

107 See BT-Drs, supra note 33, 17/10094 at 2.Google Scholar

108 Compare BT Plenarprotokoll, supra note 33, 17/118, with BT-Drs, supra note 33, 17/10094, 17/7985.Google Scholar

109 See BT-Drs, supra note 33, 17/12870; BT-Drs, supra note 33, 17/10094; BT-Drs, supra note 33, 17/7985.Google Scholar

110 Bundesverfassungsgericht [BVerfG - Federal Constitutional Court], Case No. 1 BvR 1008/12 (pending); Bundesverfassungsgericht [BVerfG - Federal Constitutional Court], Case No. 1 BvR 1444/12 (pending).Google Scholar

111 Bundesrat Drucksachen [BR] 549/13.Google Scholar

112 According to the Agreement (Luxemburg Accord), West Germany was to pay Israel for the slave labor and persecution of Jews during the Holocaust, and to compensate for Jewish property that was stolen by the Nazis. See Frederick Honig, The Reparations Agreement between Israel and the Federal Republic of Germany, 48 Am. J. Int'l L. 564 (1954).Google Scholar