¹ See, e.g., Kostakopoulou, Dora, Co-creating European Union Citizenship, in European Commission Policy Review 14 (2013).Google Scholar

² See, e.g., United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child art. 8, Nov. 20, 1989, 1577 U.N.T.S. 3 (concerning the child's right to preserve his or her identity, including nationality, name and family relations).Google Scholar

³ See Report from the Commission—Third Report from the Commission on Citizenship of the Union, at 7, COM (2001) 506 final (Jul. 9, 2001).Google Scholar

⁴ See Results of the 2014 European Elections, Eur. Parliament (May 25, 2014), http://www.results-elections2014.eu/en/turnout.html.Google Scholar

⁵ Guild, Elspeth, The Legal Elements of European Identity—EU Citizenship and Migration Law (2004).Google Scholar

⁶ Id. at 1.Google Scholar

⁷ Id. at xi. Google Scholar

⁸ Malta, Dadouch v., ECHR App. No. 38816/07, para. 47 (Oct. 20, 2010), http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/.Google Scholar

⁹ Malta, Genovese v., ECHR App. No. 53124/09, paras. 33–34 (Jan. 11, 2012), http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/.Google Scholar

¹⁰ See Andreas F&llesdal, Union Citizenship: Unpacking the Beast of Burden (Arena Center for European Studies, Working Paper No. 01/9, 2001).Google Scholar

¹¹ See the launch of the European Year of Citizens by the Irish Presidency at http://eu2013.ie/ireland-and-the-presidency/abouttheeu/theeuandyou/europeanyearofcitizens/ Google Scholar

¹² Janko Rottmann v. Freistaat Bayern, CJEU Case C-135/08, 2010 E.C.R. I-1449.Google Scholar

¹³ See Guild, Elspeth, The Legal Elements of European Identity—EU Citizenship and Migration Law 17 (2004)Google Scholar

¹⁴ Malta, Genovese v., ECHR App. No. 53124/09, paras. 12, 41 (Jan. 11, 2012), http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/.Google Scholar

¹⁵ Id. at para. 22.Google Scholar

¹⁶ Id. at para. 30.Google Scholar

¹⁷ Id. at para. 33.Google Scholar

¹⁸ Id. at paras. 34–36.Google Scholar

¹⁹ Finland, Karassev v., ECHR App. No. 31414/96 (Jan. 12, 1999), http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/.Google Scholar

²⁰ The Finnish Nationality Act entitled a child born in Finland who did not at birth receive the citizenship of any other country to Finnish nationality.Google Scholar

²¹ Finland, Karassev v., ECHR App. No. 31414/96, para. 1b (Jan. 12, 1999), http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/.Google Scholar

²² Id. Google Scholar

²³ Id. Google Scholar

²⁴ Id. Google Scholar

²⁵ Id. at para. 2.Google Scholar

²⁶ See also Groot, Rene de & Vonk, Oliver, Non-discriminatory access to the nationality of the father protected by the ECHR, A comment on Genovese v. Malta (European Court of Human Rights, Oct. 11, 2011), http://eudo-citizenship.eu/caselawDB/docs/Case%20Law%20Notes/Genovese%20case%20comment.pdf.Google Scholar

²⁷ See Malta, Genovese v., ECHR App. No. 53124/09, para. 34 (Jan. 11, 2012), http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/.Google Scholar

²⁸ Id. at para. 28.Google Scholar

²⁹ Id. at para. 28.Google Scholar

³⁰ Id. at para. 33.Google Scholar

³¹ Id. at paras. 48–49.Google Scholar

³² Malta, Genovese v., ECHR App. No. 53124/09 (Jan. 11, 2012), http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/ (Valenzia, J., dissenting).Google Scholar

³³ Id. Google Scholar

³⁴ Id. Google Scholar

³⁵ Id. Google Scholar

³⁶ Janko Rottmann v. Freistaat Bayern, CJEU Case C-135/08, 2010 E.C.R. I-1449, paras. 42, 49.Google Scholar

³⁷ Id. at para. 56 (emphasis added).Google Scholar

³⁸ See Shaw, Jo, Setting the scene: the Rottmann case introduced, 1–4 (Robert Schuman Center for Advanced Studies, EUI Working Paper No. 62, 2011), available at http://eudo-citizenship.eu/docs/RSCAS_2011_62.pdf; Gareth T. Davies, The entirely conventional supremacy of Union citizenship and rights, 5–10 (Robert Schuman Center for Advanced Studies, EUI Working Paper No. 62, 2011), available at http://eudo-citizenship.eu/docs/RSCAS_2011_62.pdf.Google Scholar

³⁹ Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, Mar. 30, 2010, 2010 O.J. (C 83/389) arts. 7, 21(1).Google Scholar

⁴⁰ Read about the Swedish reform at http://www.regeringen.se/download/07304fa5.pdf?major=1&minor=215710&cn=attachmentPublDuplicator_0_attachment; see Danish Nationality Act, Consolidation Act No. 422, July 1, 2014, § 1 available at https://www.retsinformation.dk/Forms/R0710.aspx?id=163631.Google Scholar

⁴¹ Gerado Ruiz Zambrano v. Office national de l'emploi (ONEM), CJEU Case C-34/09, 2011 E.C.R. I 2011 I-01177; see also Careth T. Davies, The Family Rights of European Children: Expulsion of Non-European Parents (Robert Schuman Center for Advanced Studies, EUI Working Paper No. 4, 2012), available at http://cadmus.eui.eu/bitstream/handle/1814/20375/RSCAS_2012_04.pdf?sequence=1.Google Scholar

⁴² Eur. Comm'n, European Citizenship Report 4 (2013), http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/flash/fl_365_en.pdf.Google Scholar

⁴³ Id. at 6.Google Scholar

⁴⁴ Id. at 21.Google Scholar

⁴⁵ Id. at 26–27.Google Scholar

⁴⁶ Id. Google Scholar

⁴⁷ See Eur. Comm'n, Public Opinion in the European Union, First Results (2013), http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/eb/eb79/eb79_first_en.pdf.Google Scholar

⁴⁸ Id. at 5.Google Scholar

⁴⁹ Id. More than three in four respondents in Luxembourg, Malta and Slovakia feel that they are citizens of the EU, while less than half do so in Bulgaria, the United Kingdom, Cyprus and Greece. However, these are the only four Member States where a majority of respondents do not feel that they are citizens of the EU.Google Scholar

⁵⁰ See Eur. Comm'n, Eurobarometer 71: Future of Europe (2010), http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/eb/eb71/eb713_future_europe.pdf.Google Scholar

⁵¹ Id. at 34.Google Scholar

⁵² Id. at 39.Google Scholar

⁵³ Id. Google Scholar

⁵⁴ Compare id. at 35–36, with id. at 37–38.Google Scholar

⁵⁵ Id. at 42–50.Google Scholar

⁵⁶ Id. Google Scholar

⁵⁷ Eur. Comm'n, supra note 47, at 5.Google Scholar

⁵⁸ Id. at 8.Google Scholar

⁵⁹ Id. Google Scholar

⁶⁰ Id. at 9.Google Scholar

⁶¹ Id. at 10.Google Scholar

⁶² Id. Google Scholar

⁶³ Id. at 11.Google Scholar

⁶⁴ Id. Google Scholar

⁶⁵ Id. at 27.Google Scholar

⁶⁶ Id. at 29.Google Scholar

⁶⁷ Id. at 27.Google Scholar

⁶⁸ Id. at 11; Eur. Comm'n, supra note 42, at 21.Google Scholar

⁶⁹ Eur. Comm‘n, supra note 42, at 6; Eur. Comm‘n, supra note 47, at 7.Google Scholar

⁷⁰ Eur. Comm'n, supra note 47, at 5.Google Scholar

⁷¹ See Karolina Rostek & Gareth Davies, The Impact of Union Citizenship on National Citizenship Policies, 22 Tul. Eur. & Civ. L. F. 95, 96 (2007).Google Scholar

⁷² See Spanish Memorandum: Towards a European Citizenship, Council Doc. SN 3940/90 (Feb. 21, 1991), http://eudo-citizenship.eu/inc/policydoc/Spanish%20Memorandum.pdf.Google Scholar

⁷³ See Dansk Institut for Internationale Studier, De Danske Forbehold, Udviklingen Siden 2000, 30, 34 (2008).Google Scholar

⁷⁴ Id.; see also Henrik Larsen, British and Danish policies in the 1990s: A Discourse Approach, 5(4) Eur. J. of Int'l. Rel. 464, 466 (1999).Google Scholar

⁷⁵ See Dansk Udenrigspolitisk Institut, Udviklingen I EU Siden 1992 på de Områder, der er Omfattet af de Danske Forbehold 31 (2000).Google Scholar

⁷⁶ See The National Compromise: Denmark in Europe (1992), http://www.eu-oplysningen.dk/dokumenter/traktat/eu/nationalkompromis/.Google Scholar

⁷⁷ Id. at § A. Introductory Remarks.Google Scholar

⁷⁸ See Edinburgh Agreement, Folketinget (1992), http://www.eu-oplysningen.dk/emner_en/forbehold/edinburgh/.Google Scholar

⁷⁹ See European Council, Birmingham Declaration (Oct. 16, 1992), http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_DOC-92-6_en.htm.Google Scholar

⁸⁰ See Denmark and the Treaty on European Union, Dec. 31, 1992, 1992 O.J. (C 348).Google Scholar

⁸¹ Id. Google Scholar

⁸² Stated in the preparatory work to the Danish Act on ratification of the Maastricht Treaty, see Betænkning Mar. 19, 1993 in FT 1992–93 tillæg B 977.Google Scholar

⁸³ Treaty of Amsterdam Amending the Treaty of The European Union, the Treaties Establishing the European Communities and Certain Related Acts, Oct. 2, 1997, 1997 O.J. (C 340) art. 2(9) [hereinafter Treaty of Amsterdam].Google Scholar

⁸⁴ See Jacobs, Francis G., Citizenship of the European Union—A Legal Analysis, 13(5) Eur. L. J. 592 (2007).Google Scholar

⁸⁵ Dansk Institut for Internationale Studier, supra note 73.Google Scholar

⁸⁶ See Danish Institute for International Studies, De Danske forbehold over for den Europæiske union, Udviklingen siden 2000, 244–45 (2008).Google Scholar

⁸⁷ Id. Google Scholar

⁸⁸ See Opinion Poll (2013), http://img.borsen.dk/img/cms/tuksi4/media/cmsmedia/2273_content_2_2266.pdf.Google Scholar

⁸⁹ Id. Google Scholar

⁹⁰ Id. Google Scholar

⁹¹ In total the respondents were asked five questions: one for each opt-out and one for “the whole package.”Google Scholar

⁹² Opinion Poll, supra note 88.Google Scholar

⁹³ Opinion Poll, supra note 88.Google Scholar

⁹⁴ Opinion Poll, supra note 88.Google Scholar

⁹⁵ See Eur. Comm'n, supra note 42.Google Scholar

⁹⁶ See Eur. Comm'n, supra note 47.Google Scholar

⁹⁷ See Eur. Comm'n, supra note 42.Google Scholar

⁹⁸ Cf., supra, the confusion created by the translation of the Spanish memorandum where EU citizenship was translated to EU statsborgerskab. Google Scholar

⁹⁹ Eur. Comm'n, supra note 42, at question 2 in the Danish version, http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/flash/fl_365_fact_dk_da.pdf.Google Scholar

¹⁰⁰ See, e.g., infra, judgments in Section D.Google Scholar

¹⁰¹ See Talevski, Kirsten, God vejledning styrker borgernes retssikkerhed [Good Guidance Strengthens the Legal Rights of Citizens], Parliamentary Ombudsmen Report (2009), http://beretning.ombudsmanden.dk/artikler/god_vejledning_styrker_borgernes_retssikkerhed.Google Scholar

¹⁰² See Vejledningssagen er slut [The case on guidance is brought to an end], Folketingets Ombudsmand (Nov. 21, 2008), http://www.ombudsmanden.dk/find/nyheder/alle/Vejledningssagen_er_slut/Vejledningssagenerslut.pdf.Google Scholar

¹⁰³ Jacobs, Francis G., Citizenship of the European Union – A Legal Analysis, 13(5) Euro. L.J. 592 (2007).Google Scholar

¹⁰⁴ See Treaty of Maastricht on European Union, Nov. 1, 1993, O.J. (C 191) art. 8(a)-(f).Google Scholar

¹⁰⁵ Jacobs, , supra note 103, at 592.Google Scholar

¹⁰⁶ Consolidated Version of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, May 9, 2008, 2008 O.J. (C 115) art. 18 [hereinafter TFEU) (stating, “[w]ithin the scope of application of the Treaties, and without prejudice to any special provisions contained therein, any discrimination on grounds of nationality shall be prohibited. The European Parliament and the Council, acting in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure, may adopt rules designed to prohibit such discrimination.”).Google Scholar

¹⁰⁷ See Gerardo Ruiz Zambrano v. Office national de l'emploi (ONEM), CJEU Case C-34/09, 2011 E.C.R. I-01177, para. 41.Google Scholar

¹⁰⁸ See Jacobs, , supra note 103Google Scholar

¹⁰⁹ See, e.g., Kunqian Catherine Zhu and Man Lavette Chen v. Sec'y of State for the Home Dep't, CJEU Case C-200/02, 2004 E.C.R. I-9925; Janko Rottmann v. Freistaat Bayern, CJEU Case C-135/08, 2010 E.C.R. I-1449; Zambrano, CJEU Case C-34/09.Google Scholar

¹¹⁰ See Leanaerts, Justice Koen, “Civis europaeus sum”: From the Cross-Border Link to the Status of Citizen of the Union, 3 Online J. Free Movement of Workers Within the Eur. Union 6 (2011).Google Scholar

¹¹¹ See Jacobs, , supra, note 103.Google Scholar

¹¹² See Shaw, Jo, Concluding Thoughts: Rottmann in Context, Eur. University Institute 8 (2011).Google Scholar

¹¹³ See supra Part B.Google Scholar

¹¹⁴ See European Convention on Nationality, Nov. 6, 1997, E.T.S. No. 166 art. 3.Google Scholar

¹¹⁵ See Anne Zacho M&ller, Network Formation and Sense of Belonging: An Investigation of Social Boundaries and Trifocal Affiliation, 7 (Spring 2009) (unpublished Master's Thesis, Malmö Högskola), http://www.aegteskabudengraenser.dk/uploads/files/thesis_gathered.pdf (explaining how Danish citizens move to Sweden with a foreign spouse with a view to acquire Swedish citizenship after two years' residence—possible for Nordic citizens—in order to move back to Denmark as EU citizens with a TCN spouse (so far, Danish citizenship is lost by the acquisition of a foreign citizenship).Google Scholar

¹¹⁶ See Costanza Margiotta & Olivier Vonk, Nationality Law and European Citizenship: The Role of Dual Nationality 7 (Eur. Univ. Institute, Eur. Union Democracy Observatory on Citizenship, Working Paper No. RSCAS 66, 2010), available at http://eudo-citizenship.eu/docs/RSCAS%202010_66.pdf (explaining Italian Citizenship policy that allows Italian citizenship to be passed on after emigration without restrictions, even a person who can prove descent from an Italian who emigrated before the unification of Italy in 1861 is entitled to Italian nationality, provided that the Italian ancestor was alive at the time of the unification).Google Scholar

¹¹⁷ Mario Vicente Micheletti and others v. Delegación del Gobierno en Cantabria, CJEU Case C-369/90, 1992 E.C.R. I-04239 (This case was decided before the Maastricht Treaty entered into force.).Google Scholar

¹¹⁸ Id. at paras. 2-4.Google Scholar

¹¹⁹ Id. at para. 10.Google Scholar

¹²⁰ See Report from the Commission—Third Report from the Commission on Citizenship of the Union, at 7, COM (2001) 506 final (Jul. 9, 2001).Google Scholar

¹²¹ See Margiotta, & Vonk, , supra note 116.Google Scholar

¹²² See Bauböck, Rainer & Perchinig, Bernhard, Evaluations and Recommendations, in Acquisition and Loss of Nationality, Vol. 1: Comparative Analyses 454 (Rainer Bauböck et al. eds., 2006).Google Scholar

¹²³ Information about the case given during counseling at the Danish Institute for Human Rights in 2013.Google Scholar

¹²⁴ See Consolidated Act on Danish Nationality, No. 422, July 1, 2004, § 8(1) (stating, “[a]ny person born abroad who has never lived in Denmark nor been staying in Denmark under circumstances indicating some association with Denmark will lose his or her Danish nationality on attaining the age of 22 unless this will make the person concerned stateless. The Minister for Refugee, Immigration and Integration Affairs [now the Minister of Justice] or the person he so authorises may grant an application, submitted before the applicant's 22nd birthday, for retention of Danish nationality.”).Google Scholar

¹²⁵ See Janko Rottmann v Freistaat Bayern, CJEU Case C-135/08, 2010 E.C.R. I-1449, para 42.Google Scholar

¹²⁶ Id. at paras. 45-46 (regarding the CJEU's possibility to rule on questions concerning the conditions in which a citizen of the Union may, due to loss of citizenship, lose his or her status of citizen of the Union and thereby be deprived of the rights attaching to that status).Google Scholar

¹²⁷ See supra text accompanying note 123.Google Scholar

¹²⁸ See Rottmann, CJEU Case C-135/08 at paras. 50-52 (holding it is for the national court to ascertain whether a withdrawal decision observes the principle of proportionality so far as concerns the consequences it entails for the situation of the person concerned in the light of European Union law, in addition, where appropriate, to examination of the proportionality of the decision in the light of national law).Google Scholar

¹²⁹ See Zhu and Chen, CJEU Case C-200/02, 2004 E.C.R. I-09925.Google Scholar

¹³⁰ Id. at para. 26.Google Scholar

¹³¹ Id. at paras. 7–14.Google Scholar

¹³² Id. at para. 25.Google Scholar

¹³³ Id. at paras. 36-41.Google Scholar

¹³⁴ Id. at para. 45.Google Scholar

¹³⁵ See The Queen v. Sec'y of State for the Home Dep't, ex parte Manjit Kaur, CJEU Case C-192/99, 2001 E.C.R. I-1237, paras. 19-27.Google Scholar

¹³⁶ Information about the case given during counseling at the Danish Institute for Human Rights in 2011-2013.Google Scholar

¹³⁷ Convention on the Rights of the Child art. 7, Nov. 20, 1989 (establishing that the child shall have the right from birth to a name and the right to acquire a nationality).Google Scholar

¹³⁸ See the Ministry of Justice's Circular Letter No. 9253 of 6 June 2013 on naturalisation, available at https://www.retsinformation.dk/Forms/R0710.aspx?id=152087, § 17, (stating that in accordance with the 1989 Convention on the Rights of the Child, children who are born stateless in Denmark may be listed in a naturalisation bill, regardless of whether they fulfil the ordinary conditions, if they are resident in Denmark.).Google Scholar

¹³⁹ Folketinget underkender Morten B&dskov i sag om statsl&s pige [The Parliament does not approve (the Minister of Justice) in case on stateless girl], Information (Apr. 25, 2013), http://www.information.dk/458535.Google Scholar

¹⁴⁰ See Blaise Baheten Metock and Others v. Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform, CJEU Case C-127/08, 2008 3 C.M.L.R. 39.Google Scholar

¹⁴¹ Id. at paras. 62-65.Google Scholar

¹⁴² The other three cases dealt with applicants who had not been lawfully residing in another member state before moving to Ireland.Google Scholar

¹⁴³ See Sec'y of State for the Home Dep't v. Hacene Akrich, CJEU Case C-109/01, 2003 E.C.R. I-9607, para.50.Google Scholar

¹⁴⁴ See Metock, CJEU Case C-127/08 at para. 80.Google Scholar

¹⁴⁵ Id. at para. 56.Google Scholar

¹⁴⁶ Id. at para. 68.Google Scholar

¹⁴⁷ See Zambrano, CJEU Case C-34/09 at para. 39.Google Scholar

¹⁴⁸ See Murat Dereci and Others v. Bundesministerium für Inneres, CJEU Case C-256/11, 2011 E.C.R. I-11315, paras. 54, 74.Google Scholar

¹⁴⁹ See Staver, Anne, Reverse Discrimination in European Family Reunification Policies, in Democratic Citizenship and the Free Movement of People 57 (Willem Maas ed., 2013).Google Scholar

¹⁵⁰ See The Single Market Act II, Together for New Growth (Oct. 3, 2012), http://ec.europa.eu/internal_market/smact/docs/single-market-act2_en.pdf.Google Scholar

¹⁵¹ See European Convention on Nationality, Nov. 6, 1997, E.T.S. No. 166 (referring to the Danish-Swedish route).Google Scholar

¹⁵² Staver, , supra note 149, at 85 (opining that this use of free movement is arguably by no means “free” and that one may go so far as to call it a new type of forced movement).Google Scholar

¹⁵³ See Opinion of Advocate General Sharpton at para. 144; Government of the French Community and Walloon Government v. Flemish Government, CJEU Case C-212/06, 2008 E.C.R. I-1683.Google Scholar

¹⁵⁴ See S&rensen and Rasmussen v. Denmark, ECHR App. No. 52562/99, 52620/99 (Jan. 11, 2006), http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/.Google Scholar

¹⁵⁵ Id. at para. 77.Google Scholar

¹⁵⁶ See Biao v. Denmark, ECHR App. No. 10 (Mar. 25, 2014), http://hudoc.echr.coe.int.Google Scholar

¹⁵⁷ See Danish Aliens Act, Consolidation Act No. 785, Aug. 10, 2009, § 9(7).Google Scholar

¹⁵⁸ The refusal of family reunion based on the 28-years rule and the atachment requirement was not invalid, neither the ECHR nor the European Convention on nationality had been violated., Sup Ct. Den., Case No. U.20101035H (Jan. 3, 2010), available at http://eudo-citizenship.eu/databases/citizenship-case-law/#.Google Scholar

¹⁵⁹ See, e.g., Biao, ECHR App. No. 10; Eva Ersb&ll, Biao v. Denmark – Discrimination Among Citizens? (Eur. Univ. Inst., EUDO Citizenship Observatory, Working Paper No. 79, 2014 available at http://www.eudo-citizenship.eu/publications/working-papers).Google Scholar

¹⁶⁰ See Guild, Elspeth, The Legal Elements of European Identity – EU Citizenship and Migration Law 244 (2004) (stating the fact that EU law prevents some from living together and privileges others is unlikely to command respect from those who suffer from its effects).Google Scholar

¹⁶¹ See Strike, Tineke, Anita Böcker, Maaike Luiten, & Ricky van Oers, Integrations and Naturalisation Tests: The New Way to European Citizenship (Centre for Migration Law, Radbound Univ. Nijmegen 2010).Google Scholar

¹⁶² See report on Swedish citizenship: Slutbetänkande av 1997 års medborgerskapskommitté: Svenskt medborgarskap (SOU 1999:34).Google Scholar

¹⁶³ See Rainer Bauböck & Bernhard Perchinig, Evaluations and recommendations, in Acquisition and Loss of Nationality, Vol. 1: Comparative Analyses 442 (Rainer Bauböck et. al. eds., 2006).Google Scholar

¹⁶⁴ Id. Google Scholar

¹⁶⁵ See Karolina Rostek & Gareth Davis, The Impact of Union Citizenship on National Citizenship Policies, 22 Tul. Eur. & Civ. L.F. 89-156 (2007).Google Scholar

¹⁶⁶ See Bauböck, Rainer, Stakeholder Citizenship: An Idea Whose Time Has Come? (Migration Policy Institute 2008).Google Scholar

¹⁶⁷ See Bauböck, Rainer, Studying Citizenship Constellations, 36(5) J. Ethnic & Migration Stud. 847-859 (May 2010).Google Scholar

¹⁶⁸ See Walter, Anne, Reverse Discrimination and Family reunification 58 (2008).Google Scholar

¹⁶⁹ Id. Google Scholar

¹⁷⁰ Id. Google Scholar

¹⁷¹ See Opinion of Advocate General Sharpston at para. 144; Zambrano, CJEU Case C-34/09.Google Scholar

¹⁷² Id. at para. 155.Google Scholar

¹⁷³ See The Nordic Agreement on Citizenship, Den.-Fin.-Ice.-Nor.-Swed., Sept. 10, 2013.Google Scholar

¹⁷⁴ See League of Nations: Committee for the Progressive Codification of International Law Documents [1925–1928], Vol. Two 46 (Shabtai Rosenne ed., 1972).Google Scholar

¹⁷⁵ Id. at 48.Google Scholar

¹⁷⁶ Id. Google Scholar

¹⁷⁷ Id. Google Scholar

¹⁷⁸ See Knud Larsen, Nordisk Statsborgerret (1944).Google Scholar

¹⁷⁹ Id. at 83.Google Scholar

¹⁸⁰ See Leanaerts, , supra, note 110.Google Scholar