Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-kwt9d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-15T02:46:22.405Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Shared Transatlantic Jurisprudence of Dignity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2019

Russell Miller

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

Critiques of Robert Kagan's recent, inflamatory work on the nature and state of transatlanticisim seem to come in three forms: material, analytical and emotional. By “material” I mean critiques of the fundamental and more or less obvious facts and structures out of which he has spun his claims. These facts amount to little more than the less than revelatory reminder that the U.S. devotes considerably more resources to security and defense spending than do Europeans. Critiques of Kagan's work at this level are pointless. At least on this much, Kagan has it right: we are now all too familiar with the staggering statistic that reveals that American security and defense spending is equal to the total of the expenditures of the next twenty countries.

Information

Type
Special Issue
Information
German Law Journal , Volume 4 , Issue 9: Special Issue , 01 September 2003, pp. 925 - 934
Copyright
Copyright © 2003 by German Law Journal GbR 

References

1 Kagan, Robert, Power and Weakness, Policy Review No. 113 June/July (2002); Robert Kagan, Of Paradise and Power: America and Europe in the New World Order (2003).Google Scholar

2 Kagan, Robert, Of Paradise and Power: America and Europe in the New World Order 24-26 (2003).Google Scholar

3 Last of the Big Time Spenders: U.S. Military Budget is Still the World's Largest and Growing, CDI Fiscal Year 2004 Budget http://www.cdi.org/budget/2004/world-military-spending.cfm> (Visited 5 August 2003).+(Visited+5+August+2003).>Google Scholar

4 Kagan, Robert, Of Paradise and Power: America and Europe in the New World Order 3 (2003).Google Scholar

5 See, e.g., Schifferes, Steve, U.S. Seeks Help to Rebuild Iraq, BBC News Online, 4 June 2003 http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/2964102.stm> (Visited 5 August 2003).+(Visited+5+August+2003).>Google Scholar

6 Kagan, Robert, Of Paradise and Power: America and Europe in the New World Order 4 (2003).Google Scholar

7 Kagan, Robert, Of Paradise and Power: America and Europe in the New World Order 103 (2003).Google Scholar

8 Art. 102 GG.Google Scholar

9 Prot. 6, Art. 1 ECHR.Google Scholar

10 Case of Öcalan v. Turkey, ECHR No. 00046221/99, 12 March 2003, Para. 55 http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/hudoc/ViewRoot.asp?Item=0&Action=Html&X=805140247&Notice=0&Noticemode=&RelatedMode=0> (Visited 5 August 2003).+(Visited+5+August+2003).>Google Scholar

11 Case of Öcalan v. Turkey, ECHR No. 00046221/99, 12 March 2003, Paras. 55 and 172 http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/hudoc/ViewRoot.asp?Item=0&Action=Html&X=805140247&Notice=0&Noticemode=&RelatedMode=0> (Visited 5 August 2003).+(Visited+5+August+2003).>Google Scholar

12 Prot. 6, Art. 2 ECHR.Google Scholar

13 Prot. 13, Arts. 2 and 3 ECHRGoogle Scholar

14 Case of Öcalan v. Turkey, ECHR No. 00046221/99, 12 March 2003 http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/hudoc/ViewRoot.asp?Item=0&Action=Html&X=805140247&Notice=0&Noticemode=&RelatedMode=0> (Visited 5 August 2003).+(Visited+5+August+2003).>Google Scholar

15 Soering v. the United Kingdom, ECHR No. 00014038/88, 7 July 1989, http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/hudoc/ViewRoot.asp?Item=0&Action=Html&X=805141832&Notice=0&Noticemode=&RelatedMode=0> (Visited 5 August 2003).+(Visited+5+August+2003).>Google Scholar

16 Case of Öcalan v. Turkey, ECHR No. 00046221/99, 12 March 2003, Paras. 187-198 http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/hudoc/ViewRoot.asp?Item=0&Action=Html&X=805140247&Notice=0&Noticemode=&RelatedMode=0> (Visited 5 August 2003). Article 3 of the Convention states: “No one shall be subjected to torture or to inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.” Art. 3 ECHR.+(Visited+5+August+2003).+Article+3+of+the+Convention+states:+“No+one+shall+be+subjected+to+torture+or+to+inhuman+or+degrading+treatment+or+punishment.”+Art.+3+ECHR.>Google Scholar

17 Draft Treaty Establishing a Constitution for Europe, Secretariat of the European Convention, Conv. 850/3, 18 July 2003 http://european-convention.eu.int/docs/Treaty/cv00850.en03.pdf> (Visited 5 August 2003). Art. II-2 states: “No one shall be condemned to the death penalty or executed.”+(Visited+5+August+2003).+Art.+II-2+states:+“No+one+shall+be+condemned+to+the+death+penalty+or+executed.”>Google Scholar

18 Kagan, Robert, Of Paradise and Power: America and Europe in the New World Order 103 (2003).Google Scholar

19 BVerfGE 45, 187.Google Scholar

20 BVerfGE 45, 187; see, Sections 212 and 213 StGB (1975).Google Scholar

21 BVerfGE 45, 187 [206 and 213].Google Scholar

22 BVerfGE 45, 187 [225-227].Google Scholar

23 Trop v. Dulles, 356 U.S. 86, 100-101 (1958)Google Scholar

24 BVerfGE 45, 187 [227].Google Scholar

25 BVerfGE 45, 187 [227].Google Scholar

26 BVerfGE 45, 187 [228].Google Scholar

27 BVerfGE 45, 187 [228-229].Google Scholar

28 Sections 57 and 57a StGB (2003).Google Scholar

29 Sections 57 and 57a StGB (2003).Google Scholar

30 Thirty-eight states, the federal government (civilian) and the U.S. military. See, Death Penalty Information Center http://www.deathpenaltyinfo.org/article.php?did=144&scid=10> (Visited 5 August 2003).+(Visited+5+August+2003).>Google Scholar

31 Texas has executed 309 persons since reinstatement of the death penalty in 1976. See, Number of Executions by State and Region Since 1976, Death Penalty Information Center http://www.deathpenaltyinfo.org/article.php?scid=8&did=186> (Visited 5 August 2003).+(Visited+5+August+2003).>Google Scholar

32 There are 3,525 inmates on death row in the U.S. See, Death Row Inmates by State and Size of Death Row by Year, Death Penalty Information Center http://www.deathpenaltyinfo.org/article.php?scid=9&did=188#year> (Visited 5 August 2003). There are 48 women and 82 juveniles who have been sentenced to death. See, Deborah Finns, Death Row U.S.A. – Spring 2003, Criminal Justice Project of the NAACP Legal Defense and Education Fund, p. 1 http://www.deathpenaltyinfo.org/DEATHROWUSArecent.pdf> (Visited 5 August 2003).+(Visited+5+August+2003).+There+are+48+women+and+82+juveniles+who+have+been+sentenced+to+death.+See,+Deborah+Finns,+Death+Row+U.S.A.+–+Spring+2003,+Criminal+Justice+Project+of+the+NAACP+Legal+Defense+and+Education+Fund,+p.+1+http://www.deathpenaltyinfo.org/DEATHROWUSArecent.pdf>+(Visited+5+August+2003).>Google Scholar

33 McVeigh Execution: A “Completion of Justice,” CNN.com Law Center, 11 June 2001 http://www.cnn.com/2001/LAW/06/11/mcveigh.02/index.html> (Visited 5 August 2003).+(Visited+5+August+2003).>Google Scholar

34 Some thirty-seven countries implemented the death penalty in 1998. The U.S. ranked third (tied with Iran) with 68, behind China (1,067) and Congo (100). See, The Death Penalty: An International Perspective, Death Penalty Information Center http://www.deathpenaltyinfo.org/article.php?did=127&scid=30#interexec> (Visited 5 August 2003).+(Visited+5+August+2003).>Google Scholar

35 Kagan, Robert, Of Paradise and Power: America and Europe in the New World Order 3 (2003).Google Scholar

36 U.S. Const. Amend. 8.Google Scholar

37 McGautha v. California, 402 U.S. 183 (1971).Google Scholar

38 Furman v. Georgia, 408 U.S. 238 (1972).Google Scholar

39 Furman v. Georgia, 408 U.S. 238 (1972).Google Scholar

40 Trop v. Dulles, 356 U.S. 86 (1958).Google Scholar

41 Furman v. Georgia, 408 U.S. 238, 270 (1972) (quoting, Trop v. Dulles, 356 U.S. 86, 100 (1958)).Google Scholar

42 Furman v. Georgia, 408 U.S. 238, 270 (1972).Google Scholar

43 Furman v. Georgia, 408 U.S. 238, 281 (1972).Google Scholar

44 Furman v. Georgia, 408 U.S. 238, 365-366 (1972).Google Scholar

45 Gregg v. Georgia, 428 U.S. 153 (1976).Google Scholar

46 Gregg v. Georgia, 428 U.S. 153, 206-207 (1976).Google Scholar

47 Gregg v. Georgia, 428 U.S. 153, 206-207 (1976).Google Scholar

48 Lockett v. Ohio, 438 U.S. 586 (1978).Google Scholar

49 Lockett v. Ohio, 438 U.S. 586, 603-604 (1978).Google Scholar

50 Lockett v. Ohio, 438 U.S. 586, 605 (1978).Google Scholar

51 Lockett v. Ohio, 438 U.S. 586, 605 (1978).Google Scholar

52 Buchanan v. Angelone, 118 S.Ct. 757 (1998); Weeks v. Angelone, 120 S.Ct. 727 (2000).Google Scholar

53 BVerfGE 45, 187 [228-229].Google Scholar

54 Lockett v. Ohio, 438 U.S. 586, 605 (1978).Google Scholar