Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-tnzcf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-15T09:05:33.151Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Coranks of a quasi-projective module and its endomorphism ring

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 May 2009

Tsutomu Takeuchi
Tsutomu Takeuchi
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Education, Hirosaki University, Hirosaki, 036, Japan
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

Recently several authors have studied dualizing Goldie dimension of a module: spanning dimension in [2], codimension in [13], corank in [16] and also [9,17,12, 5,11, 6, 4, 7] ([13] may be read in comparison with the others). In the present note we prove the equality corank RP = corank SS, where P is a quasi-projective left R-module and S is its endomorphism ring. This result is an answer to the question [12, p. 1898] and an extension of [3, Corollary 4.3] which shows the above equality for a Σ-quasi-projective left R-module P.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Glasgow Mathematical Journal , Volume 36 , Issue 3 , September 1994, pp. 381 - 383
Copyright
Copyright © Glasgow Mathematical Journal Trust 1994

References

REFERENCES

1.Albu, T. and Năstăsescu, C., Relative finiteness in module theory, (Marcel Dekker, 1984).Google Scholar
2.Fleury, P., A note on dualizing Goldie dimension, Canad. Math. Bull. 17 (1974), 511–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Hernández, J. L. García and Pardo, J. L. Gómez, On endomorphism rings of quasiprojective modules, Math. Z. 196 (1987), 87–108.Google Scholar
4.Grzeszczuk, P. and Puczylowski, E. R., On Goldie and dual Goldie dimensions, J. Pure Appl. Algebra 31 (1984), 47–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Gupta, A. K. and Varadarajan, K., Modules over endomorphism rings, Comm. Algebra 8 (1980), 1291–1333.Google Scholar
6.Haack, J. K., The duals of the Camillo-Zelmanowitz formulas for Goldie dimension, Canad. Math. Bull. 25 (1982), 325–334.Google Scholar
7.Hanna, A. and Shamsuddin, A., Duality in the category of modules. Applications, Algebra Berichte 49,(Reinhard Fischer, 1984).Google Scholar
8.Miller, R. W. and Turnidge, D. R., Factors of cofinitely generated injective modules, Comm. Algebra 4 (1976), 233–243.Google Scholar
9.Rangaswamy, K. M., Modules with finite spanning dimension, Canad. Math. Bull. 20 (1977), 255–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Rangaswamy, K. M., Some remarks on the endomorphism rings of quasi projective modules, Publ. Math. Debrecen 26 (1979), 71–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Reiter, E., A dual to the Goldie ascending chain condition on direct sums of submodules, Bull. Calcutta Math. Soc. 73 (1981), 55–63.Google Scholar
12.Sarath, B. and Varadarajan, K., Dual Goldie dimension—II, Comm. Algebra 7 (1979), 1885–1899.Google Scholar
13.Takeuchi, T., On cofinite-dimensional modules, Hokkaido Math. J. 5 (1976), 1–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14.Takeuchi, T., A note on M-projective modules, Bull. Fac. Educ. Hirosaki Univ. 44 (1980), 29–31.Google Scholar
15.Takeuchi, T., A note on M-projective modules. II, Proc. Japan Acad. (A) 60 (1984), 168–170.Google Scholar
16.Varadarajan, K., Dual Goldie dimension, Comm. Algebra 7 (1979), 565–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17.Varadarajan, K., Modules with supplements, Pacific J. Math. 82 (1979), 559–564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar