Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-7pwfn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-14T21:28:13.448Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Generalized Cesaro means of order −1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 May 2009

I. J. Maddox
I. J. Maddox
Affiliation:
The University Lancaster
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

A series ∑an is said to be summable (C, — 1) to s if it converges to s and nan = o(1) [8]. It is well known that this definition is equivalent to tn→s (n→∞), where tn = sn + nan, sn = ao + … + an. The series is summable | C, — 1 | to s if the sequence t = {tn} is of bounded variation (t ∈ B.V.), i.e. ∑ |; ▲tn |; = ∑ | tn - tn-1 | < ∞, and ∑ ▲tn = lim tn = s. An equivalent condition is ∑ | an |; < ∞, ∑an = s and ∑ | ▲(nan) | < ∞. For, suppose that ∑an = s | C, - 1 |. Since {sn} is the sequence of (C, 1)-means of {tn} and since | C, 0 | ⊂ | C, 1 |, we have ∑ | an | < ∞ and ∑an = s whence ∑ | ▲(nan) | < ∞. Conversely, ∑ | an | < ∞, ∑an = s and ∑ | ▲(nan) | < ∞ imply t ∈ B.V. and ∑▲n = s + lim nan. But lim nan = 0, since ∑ | an | < ∞.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Glasgow Mathematical Journal , Volume 7 , Issue 3 , January 1966, pp. 119 - 124
Copyright
Copyright © Glasgow Mathematical Journal Trust 1966

References

REFERENCES

1.Banach, S., Théorie des opérations linéaires (New York, 1955).Google Scholar
2.Chow, H. C., Note on convergence and summability factors, J. London Math. Soc. 29 (1954), 459–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Hardy, G. H. and Riesz, M., The general theory of Dirichlet's series (Cambridge Tract No. 18, 1915).Google Scholar
4.Knopp, K. and Lorentz, G. G., Beiträge zur absoluten Limitierung, Archiv. der Math. 2 (1949), 10–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Kuttner, B., On discontinuous Riesz means of type n, J. London Math. Soc. 37 (1962), 354–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Maddox, I. J., Matrix transformations of (C, -1) summable series, Proc. Koninkl. Nederl. Akad. van Wetenschappen A 68 (1965), 129–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Peyerimhoff, A., Summierbarkeitsfaktoren für absolut Cesàro-summierbare Reihen, Math. Z. 59 (1954), 417–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Young, W. H., On the convergence of the derived series of a Fourier series, Proc. London Math. Soc. (2) 17 (1918), 195–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar