Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-rdgjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-09T13:59:23.964Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Minimal Cockcroft subgroups

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 May 2009

Jens Harlander
Jens Harlander
Affiliation:
Fachbereich Mathematik, Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universität, 6000 Frankfurt/Main 11
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

Consider any group G. A [G, 2]-complex is a connected 2-dimensional CW-complex with fundamental group G. If X is a [G, 2]-complex and L is a subgroup of G, let XL denote the covering complex of X corresponding to the subgroup L. We say that a [G, 2]-complex is L-Cockcroft if the Hurewicz map hL:π2(X)→;H2(XL) is trivial. In case L = G we call X Cockcroft. There are interesting classes of 2-complexes that have the Cockcroft property. A [G, 2]-complex X is aspherical if π2(X) = 0. It was observed in [4] that a subcomplex of an aspherical 2-complex is Cockcroft. The Cockcroft property is of interest to group theorists as well. Let X be a [G, 2]-complex modelled on a presentation (〈S; R〉 of the group G. If it can be shown that X is Cockcroft, then it follows from Hopf's theorem (see [2, p. 31]) that H2(G) is isomorphic to H2(X). In particular H2(G) is free abelian. For a survey on the Cockcroft property see Dyer [5]. A collection {Gα: α ∈ Ώ} of subgroups of a group G that is totally ordered by inclusion is called a chain of subgroups of G. Denning β ≤ α if and only if Gα ≤ Gβ makes Ώ into a totally ordered set. The main result of this paper is the following theorem.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Glasgow Mathematical Journal , Volume 36 , Issue 1 , January 1994 , pp. 87 - 90
Copyright
Copyright © Glasgow Mathematical Journal Trust 1994

References

REFERENCES

1.Adams, J. F., A new proof of a theorem of W. H. Cockcroft, J. London Math. Soc. 30 (1955), 482–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Brown, K. S., Cohomology of groups (Springer, 1982).Google Scholar
3.Bogley, W. A., Unions of Cockcroft two-complexes, preprint.Google Scholar
4.Cockcroft, W. H., On two-dimensional aspherical complexes, Proc. London Math. Soc. (3) 4 (1954), 375–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Dyer, M. N., Cockcroft 2-complexes, preprint.Google Scholar
6.Howie, J., Aspherical and acyclic 2-complexes, J. London Math. Soc. (2) 20 (1979), 549–558.Google Scholar
7.Howie, J., On the fundamental group of an almost-acyclic 2-complex, Proc. Edinburgh Math. Soc. (2) 24 (1981), 119–122.Google Scholar
8.Howie, J., How to generalize one-relator group theory, Combinatorial group theory and topology, ed. Gersten, S. M. and Stallings, J. R. (Ann. of Math. Stud. 111, Princeton Univ. Press, 1987), 53–78.Google Scholar
9.Whitehead, J. H. C., On adding relations to homotopy groups, Ann. of Math. (2) 42 (1941), 409–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar