Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-j7cmm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-11T01:45:20.903Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Models for joint isometries

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 May 2009

K. R. M. Attele  and
A. R. Lubin
K. R. M. Attele
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, IL 60616, U.S.A.
A. R. Lubin
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, IL 60616, U.S.A.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

An N-tuple ℐ= (T1…, TN) of commuting contractions on a Hilbert space H is said to be a joint isometry if for all x in H, or, equivalently, if Athavale in [1] characterized the joint isometries as subnormal N-tuples whose minimal normal extensions have joint spectra in the unit sphere S2N−X a geometric perspective of this is given in [4]. Subsequently, V. Müller and F.-H. Vasilescu proved that commuting N-tuples which are joint contractions, i.e. , can be represented as restrictions of certain weighted shifts direct sum a joint isometry. In this paper we adapt the canonical models of [3], and also construct a new canonical model, which completes the previous descriptions by showing joint isometries are indeed restrictions of specific multivariable weighted shifts [2].

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Glasgow Mathematical Journal , Volume 38 , Issue 2 , May 1996 , pp. 191 - 194
Copyright
Copyright © Glasgow Mathematical Journal Trust 1996

References

REFERENCES

1.Athavale, A., On the intertwining of joint isometries, J. Operator Theory 23 (1990), 339–350.Google Scholar
2.Jewell, N. P. and Lubin, A. R., Commuting weighted shifts and analytic function theory of several variables, J. Operator Theory 1 (1979), 207–223.Google Scholar
3.Lubin, A. R., Models for commuting contractions, Michigan Math. J. 23 (1976), 161–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Lubin, A. R. and Attele, K. R. M., Dilations and commutant lifting for jointly-isometric operators—a geometric approach, to appear in J. Func. Anal.Google Scholar
5.Müller, V. and Vasilescu, F.-H., Standard models for some commuting multioperators, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 117 (1993), 979–989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Vasilescu, F.-H., An operator valued Poisson kernel, J. Func. Anal. 110 (1992), 47–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar