Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-2n9c9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-14T04:28:06.901Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

PERTURBATION OF BANACH SPACE OPERATORS WITH A COMPLEMENTED RANGE

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 March 2017

B. P. DUGGAL
Affiliation:
8 Redwood Grove, Northfield Avenue, Ealing, London W5 4SZ, United Kingdom e-mail: bpduggal@yahoo.co.uk
C. S. KUBRUSLY
Affiliation:
Catholic University of Rio de Janeiro, 22453-900, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil E-mail: carlos@ele.puc-rio.br
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

Let ${\mathcal C}[{\mathcal X}]$ be any class of operators on a Banach space ${\mathcal X}$ , and let ${Holo}^{-1}({\mathcal C})$ denote the class of operators A for which there exists a holomorphic function f on a neighbourhood ${\mathcal N}$ of the spectrum σ(A) of A such that f is non-constant on connected components of ${\mathcal N}$ and f(A) lies in ${\mathcal C}$ . Let ${{\mathcal R}[{\mathcal X}]}$ denote the class of Riesz operators in ${{\mathcal B}[{\mathcal X}]}$ . This paper considers perturbation of operators $A\in\Phi_{+}({\mathcal X})\Cup\Phi_{-}({\mathcal X})$ (the class of all upper or lower [semi] Fredholm operators) by commuting operators in $B\in{Holo}^{-1}({\mathcal R}[{\mathcal X}])$ . We prove (amongst other results) that if πB (B) = ∏m i = 1(B − μi ) is Riesz, then there exist decompositions ${\mathcal X}=\oplus_{i=1}^m{{\mathcal X}_i}$ and $B=\oplus_{i=1}^m{B|_{{\mathcal X}_i}}=\oplus_{i=1}^m{B_i}$ such that: (i) If λ ≠ 0, then $\pi_B(A,\lambda)=\prod_{i=1}^m{(A-\lambda\mu_i)^{\alpha_i}} \in\Phi_{+}({\mathcal X})$ (resp., $\in\Phi_{-}({\mathcal X})$ ) if and only if $A-\lambda B_0-\lambda\mu_i\in\Phi_{+}({\mathcal X})$ (resp., $\in\Phi_{-}({\mathcal X})$ ), and (ii) (case λ = 0) $A\in\Phi_{+}({\mathcal X})$ (resp., $\in\Phi_{-}({\mathcal X})$ ) if and only if $A-B_0\in\Phi_{+}({\mathcal X})$ (resp., $\in\Phi_{-}({\mathcal X})$ ), where B 0 = ⊕m i = 1(Bi − μi ); (iii) if $\pi_B(A,\lambda)\in\Phi_{+}({\mathcal X})$ (resp., $\in\Phi_{-}({\mathcal X})$ ) for some λ ≠ 0, then $A-\lambda B\in\Phi_{+}({\mathcal X})$ (resp., $\in\Phi_{-}({\mathcal X})$ ).

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Glasgow Mathematical Journal Trust 2017