Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-2rsb6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-12T09:26:37.316Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Representations of spaces as function spaces

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 May 2009

M. P. Stannett
Affiliation:
Department of Computer Science, The University, Sheffield, S3 7RH
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

Given a topological space X, we can consider the group G(X) of all autohomeomorphisms of X. Much is known about the relationship between X and G(X) for certain restricted classes of the space X; Whittaker [7] has shown that the existence of an isomorphism between any two sufficiently large subgroups of G(X) and G(Y) implies that X and Y are actually homeomorphic, whenever these are both compact, locally Euclidean manifolds, with or without boundary; Fine and Schweigert [1] give a detailed analysis of G(ℝ); recently, Neumann [4], Mekler [3] and Truss [6] have considered in depth the group G(ℚ).

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Glasgow Mathematical Journal Trust 1988