Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-g96k6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-09T23:20:50.389Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Small isomorphisms between group algebras

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 May 2009

G. V. Wood
G. V. Wood
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, University College of Swansea, Swansea SA2 8PP, Wales
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

If G1 and G2 are locally compact groups and the algebras Ll(G1) and Ll(G2) are isometrically isomorphic, then G1 and G2 are isomorphic (Wendel, 1952, [8]). There is evidence that the following generalization of Wendel's result is true.

If T is an algebra isomorphism of L1(G1) onto L1(G2) with ∥T∥ < √2, then G1, and G2 are isomorphic.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Glasgow Mathematical Journal , Volume 33 , Issue 1 , January 1991 , pp. 21 - 28
Copyright
Copyright © Glasgow Mathematical Journal Trust 1991

References

REFERENCES

1.Kalton, N. J. and Wood, G. V., Homomorphisms of group algebras with norm less than √2, Pacific J. Math. 62 (1976), 439–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Rudin, W., Fourier analysis on groups (Interscience, 1960).Google Scholar
3.Strichartz, R. S., Isomorphism of group algebras, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 17 (1966), 858–862.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Thomas, A. D. and Wood, G. V., Group Tables (Shiva, 1981).Google Scholar
5.Wendel, J. G., Left centralizers and isomorphisms of group algebras, Pacific J. Math. 2 (1952), 251–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Wood, G. V., Distance between group algebras, Proc. Roy. Irish Acad. Sect. A 76 (1976), 339–342.Google Scholar
7.Wood, G. V., Measures with bounded powers on locally compact groups, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 268 (1981), 187–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Wood, G. V., Isomorphisms of group algebras, Bull. London Math. Soc. 15 (1983), 247–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar