Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-7pwfn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-12T16:52:10.195Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Stone-Čech compactification of the rational world

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 May 2009

M. P. Stannett
M. P. Stannett
Affiliation:
Department of Computer Scinece, The University, Sheffield, S3 7RH
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

In his paper [11], Peter Neumann considered in detail the cycle structures of elements of Aut(ℚ), the group of all homeomorphisms of the “rational world” ℚ onto itself, and further analyses of Aut(ℚ) and its subgroups have been given by Mekler [9], Bruyns [1], and Truss [13]. My interest in Aut(ℚ) stems from its utility in proving an at first sight rather startling (to a general topologist) result concerning β ℚ, the so-called Stone-Čech compactification of ℚ, namely that βℚ\ℚ is separable, and in fact contains a homogeneous countable dense subspace. (A space X is “homogeneous” provided whenever x, y ∈ X, there is some g ∈ Aut(X) with g(x) = y.) This is in sharp contrast to the spaces βℕ\ℕ and βℝ\ℝ, which are both inseparable.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Glasgow Mathematical Journal , Volume 30 , Issue 2 , May 1988, pp. 181 - 188
Copyright
Copyright © Glasgow Mathematical Journal Trust 1988

References

1.Bruyns, P.; Aspects of the group of homeomorphisms of the rational numbers, Doctoral thesis (Oxford, 1986).Google Scholar
2.Čcch, E., On bicompact spaces, Ann. of Math. (2) 38 (1937), 823–844.Google Scholar
3.Dixon, J. D., Neumann, P. M. and Thomas, S., Subgroups of small index in infinite symmetric groups, Bull. London Math. Soc, to appear.Google Scholar
4.Frolik, Z., Non-homogeneity of βP\P, Comment. Math. Univ. Carotin. 8 (1967), 705–709.Google Scholar
5.Gillman, L. and Jerison, M., Rings of continuous functions (Van Nostrand, 1960).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Hussak, W., Iteratively defined generalisations of locally compact and discrete topological spaces, Doctoral thesis (Sheffield, 1983).Google Scholar
7.Jackson, P. P., Iterated remainders in compactifications, Doctoral thesis (Sheffield, 1980).Google Scholar
8.Juhasz, I., Cardinal functions in topology – ten years later, Math. Centre Tracts 123 (Mathematisch Centrum, Amsterdam, 1980).Google Scholar
9.Mekler, A. H., Groups embeddable in the autohomeomorphisms of ℚ, J. London Math. Soc. (2) 33 (1986), 49–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.van Mill, J., Weak P-points in čech-Stone compactifications, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 273 (1982), 657–678.Google Scholar
11.Neumann, P. M., Automorphisms of the rational world, J. London Math. Soc. (2) 32 (1985), 439–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Plank, D., On a class of subalgebras of C(X) with applications to βX\X, Fund. Math. 64 (1969), 41–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Truss, J. K., Embeddings of infinite permutation groups, Proceedings of Groups 1985 at St Andrews (to appear).Google Scholar
14.Walker, R. C., The Stone-čech compactification, Ergebnisse der Mathematik 83 (Springer, 1974).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15.Willard, S., General Topology (Addison-Wesley, 1970).Google Scholar