^{page 112 note 1} ‘Linguistics and Literature’ in Linguistics at Large, ed. Minnis, N. (St. Albans 1973) 130 f.Google Scholar

^{page 112 note 2} On Translating Poetry (Abingdon, 1970), 3.Google Scholar

^{page 112 note 3} Mason, H. A., To Homer through Pope (London, 1972), 1.Google Scholar

^{page 113 note 1} Cf. the judgement of the nineteenth-century scholar, Moritz Haupt: ‘Never translate: translation is the death of understanding.’

^{page 113 note 2} Austin, R. G., Some English Translations of Virgil (Liverpool, 1956), 21.Google Scholar

^{page 114 note 1} See, e.g., Robinson, I., The Survival of English (Cambridge, 1973), 22 ff.Google Scholar

^{page 114 note 2} Postgate, J. P., Translations and Translators (London, 1922), 3.Google Scholar

^{page 115 note 1} 742–51

^{page 115 note 2} 1224–38.

^{page 115 note 3} 806–16.

^{page 117 note 1} Virgil, , Aeneid i. 461–2.Google Scholar

^{page 117 note 2} Vergil, The Aeneid (New York, 1961), 19.Google Scholar

^{page 118 note 1} Wright, D., Beowulf (Harmondsworth, 1957), 21 ff.Google Scholar

^{page 118 note 2} Bridges, R., Ibant Obscuri, 40Google Scholar; I owe the reference to Higham, T. F. and Bowra, C. M., The Oxford Book of Greek Verse in Translation (Oxford, 1938), xxxiii.Google Scholar

^{page 119 note 1} Mackail, J. W., The Aeneid of Virgil (London, 1885)Google Scholar; Jackson, J., Virgil (Oxford, 1908)Google Scholar; Knight, W. F. Jackson, Virgil, The Aeneid (Harmondsworth, 1956).Google Scholar

^{page 121 note 1} Op. cit. xcvi.

^{page 121 note 2} Op. cit. 194f.

^{page 122 note 1} Dante, The Divine Comedy (Harmondsworth, 1949), i. 56.Google Scholar

^{page 122 note 2} Chaucer, The Canterbury Tales (Harmondsworth, 1951), 17.Google Scholar

^{page 122 note 3} Juvenal, The Sixteen Satires (Harmondsworth, 1967), 60.Google Scholar

^{page 123 note 1} Virgil, Aeneid I, edited by Austin, R. G. (Oxford, 1971).Google Scholar

^{page 124 note 1} Virgil, Aeneid 1–6, edited by Williams, R. D. (London, 1972).Google Scholar

^{page 124 note 2} Stanley, K., ‘Irony and Interpretation in Aeneid i. 462’, AJP lxxxvi (1965), 267–77.Google Scholar

^{page 124 note 3} Virgil (London, 1969), 35, 115, 134, and 148 respectively.Google Scholar

^{page 125 note 1} May, J. Lewis, ‘Concerning Translation’, The Edinburgh Review (01 1927), 117—another reference which I owe to T. F. Higham.Google Scholar

^{page 126 note 1} Greek Poetry for Everyman (London, 1951), xv f.Google Scholar

^{page 126 note 2} For a similar view see Dexter, N. C., ‘The Changing Pattern of Examinations’, Latin Teaching xxxv. 1 (1973), 8 ff.Google Scholar, and especially the comment that ‘some teachers have assumed that new ideas must necessarily replace old ideas, instead of implementing and complementing them’.

^{page 126 note 3} Higham's brief remarks on Cory have been developed in a comparison of his Heraclitus with versions of the same poem by two twentieth-century Welsh poets (Davies, Ceri, ‘Heracleitos: Tri Fersiwn’, Y Traethodydd cxxvii [1972], 14ff.).Google Scholar

^{page 126 note 4} I cannot trace my source for this anecdote nor am I sure that Charlesworth was not telling it of a clergyman friend of his.

^{page 127 note 1} The complete version of this paper was delivered as a lecture to a one-day school on Classical Literature in Translation held at the University of Birmingham in December, 1973.