¹ Davaney, Sheila Greeve, “Problems with Feminist Theory: Historicity and the Search for Sure Foundations,” in Paula M. Cooey, Sharon A. Farmer, and Mary Ellen Ross, eds., Embodied Love: Sensuality and Relationship as Feminist Values (San Francisco: Harper & Row, 1988) 79–86.Google Scholar

² See, e.g., Smith, Wilfred Cantwell, Faith and Belief (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1979).Google Scholar

³ Kant, Immanuel, Critique of Pure Reason (New York: Saint Martin's, 1965) 549–70.Google Scholar

⁴ Proudfoot, Wayne, Religious Experience (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1985) 190–227.Google Scholar

⁵ James, William, The Varieties of Religious Experience (New York: Penguin, 1982) 449–501.Google Scholar

⁶ See, e.g., Schleiermacher, Friedrich, On Religion: Speeches to Its Cultured Despisers (New York: Harper & Row, 1958)Google Scholar esp. “The Nature of Religion,” 26–118, and idem, The Christian Faith (New York: Harper & Row, 1963) 3–93Google Scholar. See also Smith, Faith and Belief.

⁷ An example of this kind of argument can be found in Heimart, Alan, Religion and the American Mind: From the Great Awakening to the Revolution (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1966).Google Scholar

⁸ See respectively Rosemary Radford Ruether, Women-Church: Theology and Practice of Feminist Liturgical Communities (San Francisco: Harper & Row, 1985); Starhawk, , “Witchcraft and Women's Culture,” in Carol P. Christ and Judith Plaskow, eds., Womanspirit Rising: A Feminist Reader in Religion (San Francisco: Harper & Row, 1979) 273–87Google Scholar; Daly, Mary, Gynlecology: The Metaethics of Radical Feminism (Boston: Beacon, 1978).Google Scholar

⁹ Schleiermacher, Speeches, 36, 43; idem, Christian Faith, 5–26.

¹⁰ Cooey, Paula, “The Power of Transformation and the Transformation of Power,” Journal of Feminist Studies in Religion 1 (1985) 24–36.Google Scholar

¹¹ Freud, Sigmund, The Future of an Illusion (New York: Norton, 1961)Google Scholar; Marx, Karl, “Contribution to the Critique of Hegel's Philosophy of the Right,” in Reinhold Niebuhr, ed., Marx and Engels on Religion (New York: Schocken, 1964) 42.Google Scholar

¹² See James, Varieties, 379–429; Proudfoot, Religious Experience, 124–48.

¹³ See, e.g., Bem, Daryl J., “Self-Perception Theory,” in L. Berkowitz, ed., Advances in Experimental and Social Psychology (New York: Academic Press, 1972) 1–61Google Scholar; Shaver, Kelly G., An Introduction to Attribution Theory (Cambridge: Winthrop, 1975).Google Scholar

¹⁴ The chief participants included Zajonc, R. B., “Feeling and Thinking: Preferences Need No Inferences,” American Psychologist 35 (1980) 151–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar, and Lazarus, Richard S., “A Cognitivist's Reply to Zajonc on Emotion and Cognition,” American Psychologist 36 (1981) 222–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

¹⁵ Zajonc, “Feeling and Thinking,” 154.

¹⁶ Geertz, Clifford, “Religion as a Cultural System,” in idem. The Interpretation of Cultures (New York: Basic Books, 1973) 87–125.Google Scholar

¹⁷ Kiecolt, Jill K. and Nelsen, Hart M., “Political Attitudes among Liberal and Conservative Protestants,” JSSR 27 (1988) 48–59.Google Scholar

¹⁸ Frijda, Nico H., “The Laws of Emotion,” American Psychologist 43 (1988) 349–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

¹⁹ Ibid., 353.

²⁰ Ibid.

²¹ Cady, Linell E., “Theories of Religion in Feminist Theologies” (paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Religion, Boston, December 1987).Google Scholar

²² For a classic example of this position see Foucault, Michel, The History of Sexuality, vol. 1: An Introduction (New York: Random House, 1980).Google Scholar

²³ See respectively Firestone, Shulamith, The Dialectic of Sex: The Case for Feminist Revolution (New York: Bantam, 1971)Google Scholar, and Irigaray, Luce, Ce sexe qui n'en est pas un (Paris: Minuit, 1977).Google Scholar

²⁴ Christ argues explicitly from a cultural-linguistic model in “Why Women Need the Goddess: Phenomenological, Psychological, and Political Reflections,” in idem and Plaskow, eds., Womanspirit Rising, 273–87.

²⁵ Morton, Nelle, The Journey Is Home (Boston: Beacon, 1985) 123.Google Scholar

²⁶ Ibid., 125, 127; emphasis in original.

²⁷ Ibid., 129.

²⁸ Ibid., 155–57.

²⁹ Davaney, “Problems with Feminist Theory,” 93–94, and Cady, “Theories of Religion.”

³⁰ Scarry, Elaine, The Body in Pain: The Making and Unmaking of the World (New York: Oxford University Press, 1985).Google Scholar

³¹ Ibid., 27–59.

³² Proudfoot, Religious Experience, 127–31.

³³ Scarry, Body in Pain, 181–243.