^{page 179 note 45} See, e.g., Gadamer, Hans-Georg, Truth and Method (trans, and ed. Barden, Garrett and Cumming, John; New York: Seabury, 1975) 57–58Google Scholar; Roszak, Theodore, Where the Wasteland Ends: Politics and Transcendence in Postindustrial Society (Garden City, NY: Doubleday, 1972)Google Scholar; Biersdorf, John E., Hunger for Experience: Vital Communities in America (New York: Seabury, 1975).Google Scholar

^{page 179 note 46} For references see Lane, Dermot A., The Experience of God: An Invitation to Do Theology (New York: Paulist, 1981) chap. 1Google Scholar, esp. n. 30; Torrell, Jean-Pierre, “New Trends in Fundamental Theology in the Postconcilear Period,” in Latourelle, René and O'Collins, Gerald, eds., Problems and Perspectives of Fundamental Theology (trans. Matthew J. O'Connell; New York: Paulist, 1982) 20–22Google Scholar; Ebeling, Gerhard, “Die Klage über das Erfahrungsdefizit in der Theologie als Frage nach ihrer Sache,” Wort und Glaube 3 (Tübingen: Mohr-Siebeck, 1975) 3–28.Google Scholar

³ Schillebeeckx, Edward, Christ: The Experience of Jesus as Lord (New York: Seabury, 1980) 29.Google Scholar

⁴ Ogden, Schubert M., Christ Without Myth: A Study Based on the Theology of Rudolf Bultmann (New York: Harper & Row, 1961) 17, 138.Google Scholar

⁵ Idem, The Reality of God and Other Essays (New York: Harper & Row, 1969) 6, 67, 109–10, 120–21.Google Scholar

⁶ Ibid., 20, 122.

⁷ Ibid., 105 n.

⁸ Ibid., 117; see 104–5, 114, 116.

⁹ Ibid., 33–34, 36–37, 114, 138, 140.

¹⁰ Ibid., 124–25; see 20.

¹¹ In Loomer, Bernard E., ed., The Future of Empirical Theology (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1969) 65–88.Google Scholar

¹² Ibid., 66.

¹³ Ibid., 66, 67.

¹⁴ Ibid., 73–74.

¹⁵ Ibid., 81–86.

¹⁶ JR 52 (1972) 22–40.

¹⁷ Ibid., 39, 25. The same formulation is used in an essay entitled “The Authority of Scripture for Theology,” Int 30 (1976) 244.Google Scholar

¹⁸ JAAR 44 (1976) 403–16.

¹⁹ Ibid., 412 and n. 12

²⁰ Ibid., 415–16.

²¹ Ibid., 413.

²² In Cobb, John B. Jr and Gamwell, Franklin L., eds., Existence and Actuality: Conversations with Charles Hartshorne, (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1984) 16–37.Google Scholar The essays in this book were presented at the Conference in Honor of Charles Hartshorne held at the Divinity School of the University of Chicago in November 1981.

²³ Ibid., 17.

²⁴ Ibid.

²⁵ Ibid., 18–19.

²⁶ Ibid., 20.

²⁷ Ogden, Schubert M., The Point of Christology (San Francisco: Harper & Row, 1982) 4.Google Scholar

²⁸ Ibid., 130, 148–49.

²⁹ Ibid., 88.

³⁰ Ibid., 94, 96.

³¹ Ibid., 167.

³² Ogden, Reality of God, 20; idem, Empirical Theology, 86, 87, 74.

³³ See, e.g., Reality of God, 20, 114, 125; and Empirical Theology, 77–86, where Ogden criticizes interpretations of experience that are derived from British empiricism, continental philosophy of life, and American radical empiricism, and commends Whitehead's interpretation of the nature of experience.

³⁴ Gilkey, Langdon, Naming the Whirlwind: The Renewal of God-Language (Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill, 1969) 250Google Scholar, 296–97, 313, 362–64. It should be pointed out that Gilkey's language and arguments about experience are rather ambiguous. For example, it is unclear whether ultimacy does or does not appear directly in concrete human experience. See the careful critique of some of his arguments by Ferré, Frederick, “A Renewal of God-Language?” JR 52 (1972) 286–304.Google Scholar

³⁵ Naming the Whirlwind, 428, 451.

³⁶ Ibid., 455. It is interesting to note that the point which Gilkey affirms here is exactly the point he criticizes in neo-orthodoxy on pp. 97–99. See also Gilkey, Langdon, Reaping the Whirlwind: A Christian Interpretation of History (New York: Seabury, 1976) 147–48.Google Scholar

³⁷ Naming the Whirlwind, 275, 451, 460, 463.

³⁸ Reaping the Whirlwind, 144.

³⁹ Ibid., 146–47.

⁴⁰ Ibid., 148.

⁴¹ Greeley, Andrew M., Unsecular Man: The Persistence of Religion (New York: Schocken, 1972) 3.Google Scholar

⁴² See Ibid., chap. 1; Ferré, “Renewal of God-Language?” 304; and Tom F. Driver, Review of Naming the Whirlwind, USQR 25 (1970) 361–67.Google Scholar

⁴³ Tracy, David, Blessed Rage for Order: The New Pluralism in Theology (New York: Seabury, 1975) 52, 69.Google Scholar

⁴⁴ Ibid., 94–115.

⁴⁵ Ibid., 71. I will not pause to point out the confusion in this passage. But one wonders how an “experience” can be shown to be “adequate to experience” by the transcendental analysis of a concept, by explicating how it is a “condition of possibility of all our experience.”

⁴⁶ Ibid., chap. 8.

⁴⁷ Tracy, David, The Analogical Imagination: Christian Theology and the Culture of Pluralism (New York: Crossroad, 1981) 69–71.Google Scholar

⁴⁸ In this connection see the critique of the “fallacy of disguised idealization” by Neville, Robert C. in Reconstruction of Thinking (Albany: SUNY Press, 1981) 87–88.Google Scholar

⁴⁹ Blessed Rage for Order, 246–47.

⁵⁰ Ibid., 246–48; Analogical Imagination, 72–77.

⁵¹ See Gilkey, Naming the Whirlwind, 243–46; Tracy, Blessed Rage for Order, 47–48, 64–69.

⁵² See the summary of this development by Fiorenza, Francis Schüssler, Foundational Theology: Jesus and the Church (New York: Crossroad, 1984) 259–64.Google Scholar

⁵³ Ibid., 299.

⁵⁴ Lindbeck, George A., The Nature of Doctrine: Religion and Theology in a Postliberal Age (Philadelphia: Westminster, 1984) 40.Google Scholar

⁵⁵ For a thorough analysis of the problems involved in an appeal to experience in theology, see Jeffner, Anders, Kriterien christlicher Glaubenslehre: Eine prinzipielle Untersuchung heutiger protestantischer Dogmatik im deutschen Sprachbereich (Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis, Studia Doctrinae Christiane Upsaliensia 13; Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell, 1977) chap. 4.Google Scholar

⁵⁶ Tillich, Paul, Systematic Theology (3 vols.; Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1951–1963) 1. 40–46.Google Scholar

⁵⁷ Ibid., 1. 44, 102–5.

⁵⁸ See, e.g., Hebblethwaite, B. L., “The Appeal to Experience in Christology,” in Sykes, S. W. and Clayton, J. P., eds., Christ, Faith and History: Cambridge Studies in Christology (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1972) 263–78Google Scholar, esp. 268; Crossman, Richard, ed., The God That Failed (New York: Bantam, 1950).Google Scholar

⁵⁹ See my essay “Where Are We in Theology?” in Marty, Martin E. and Peerman, Dean G., eds., New Theology No, 9 (New York: Macmillan, 1972).Google Scholar

⁶⁰ Tillich, Systematic Theology, 1. 42.

⁶¹ Farley, Edward, Ecclesial Reflection: An Anatomy of Theological Method (Philadelphia: Fortress, 1982) 175–76.Google Scholar

⁶² For an elaboration of these points see my book Theological Questions: Analysis and Argument (Wilton, CT: Morehouse-Barlow, 1983) 28–31.Google Scholar

⁶³ See Gilkey, Naming the Whirlwind, 277–79; Tracy, Blessed Rage for Order, 47. For a critique of Gilkey and Tracy on this point see Thomas, Theological Questions, 30 n. 9; Schüssler Fiorenza, Foundational Theology, 41, 296–300; and Lindbeck, Nature of Doctrine, chap 2.

⁶⁴ Theological Questions, 31–32.

⁶⁵ For an excellent example of such a contradictory relationship see the study by Judith Plaskow of the relation between women's experiences and the doctrines of sin and grace in Niebuhr, R. and Tillich, : Sex, Sin and Grace: Women's Experience and the Theologies of Reinhold Niebuhr and Paul Tillich (Washington: University Press of America, 1980).Google Scholar

⁶⁶ For the issues involved in the latter two points see the essays on “Interviewing: Social Research” by Robert L. Kahn and Charles F. Cannell, and “Sample Surveys” by Deming, W. Edwards in The International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences (ed. Sills, David L.; 17 vols.; New York: Macmillan/Free Press, 1968) 8. 149–61, 13. 594–612Google Scholar, respectively.

⁶⁷ Abbot, Walter M., ed., The Documents of Vatican II (New York: American Press, 1966) 116.Google Scholar

⁶⁸ Ibid., 116 n. See also the commentary by Ratzinger, Joseph in Commentary on the Documents of Vatican II (New York: Herder and Herder, 1969) 3.Google Scholar 186; see also Yves Congar, M. J., Tradition and Traditions: A Historical and Theological Essay (London: Burns and Oates, 1966) 323–28.Google Scholar

⁶⁹ See idem, Lay People in the Church: A Study for a Theology of the Laity (trans. Attwater, Donald; Westminster, MD: Newman, 1955) 287.Google Scholar