Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-tnzcf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-13T10:03:53.469Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Darwin Rocks Hegel: Does Nature Have a History?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 June 2015

David Kolb
David Kolb*
Affiliation:
Bates College, davkolb@gmail.com, www.dkolb.org
Get access

Abstract

In the popular press and the halls of politics, controversies over evolution are increasingly strident these days. Hegel is relevant in this connection, even though he rejected the theories of evolution he knew about, because he wants rational understanding and a larger process to comprehend natural processes and their history, but without any claims for intelligent design. The way current debates get publicised, there appear to be two extreme positions. The first is a reductionist materialism: all complex systems are describable purely in terms of the qualities of their most basic components, and the systems themselves result from Darwinian selection. No teleological concepts at all need be applied. At the other extreme is total teleology; all systems and their interactions and development are the result of preconceived conscious purposeful design by a powerful designer. The ontological status of the designer is usually filled out with theological notions.

Information

Type
Articles
Information
Bulletin of the Hegel Society of Great Britain , Volume 29 , Issue 1-2: number 57/58 , 2008, pp. 97 - 117
Copyright
Copyright © The Hegel Society of Great Britain 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Aboulafia, Mitchell (1980), ‘Engels, Darwin, and Hegel's Idea of Contingency’, Studies in East European Thought 21:3:211–219.Google Scholar
Aristotle, (1941), The Basic Works of Aristotle. McKeon, Richard ed., New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Cartwright, Nancy (1983), How the Laws of Physics Lie. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/0198247044.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cartwright, Nancy (1999), The Dappled World: A Study of the Boundaries of Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139167093CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dahlstrom, Daniel (1998), ‘Hegel's Appropriation of Kant's Account of Teleology in Nature’ in Houlgate, S. ed., Hegel and the Philosophy of Nature. Albany: SUNY Press, 167–188.Google Scholar
Harris, Errol (1998), ‘How Final is Hegel's Rejection of Evolution?’ in Houlgate, S. ed., Hegel and the Philosophy of Nature. Albany: SUNY Press, 189–208.Google Scholar
Hegel, G.W.F (1952), Phänomenologie des Geistes. Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag.Google Scholar
Hegel, G.W.F (1959), Enzyklopädie der philosophischen Wissenschaften 1830. Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag.Google Scholar
Hegel, G.W.F (1969), Hegel's Science of Logic. Miller, A. V., trans., London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. (1970), Hegel's Philosophy of Nature. Miller, A. V. trans., Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. (1977), Hegel's Phenomenology of Spirit. Miller, A. V. trans., Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hegel, G.W.F (1985), Gesammelte Werke, Band 21. Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. (1991), The Encyclopaedia Logic. Geraets, T. F., Suchting, W. A., Harris, H. S. trans., Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
Petty, M. J. (1970), Hegel's Philosophy of Nature. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Schiller, F. C. S. (1893), ‘Review of D. G. Ritchie's Hegel and Darwin’, The Philosophical Review 2:5:584–590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar