Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-2n9c9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-15T14:02:03.492Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Subjective Thinking: Kierkegaard on Hegel's Socrates

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 April 2013

Daniel Watts
Daniel Watts*
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, University of Essex, dpwatts@essex.ac.uk

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

One of the more surreal moments in Kierkegaard's journals involves a scene from the Underworld. Hegel has been reading Trendelenburg's Logical Investigations, and goes over to Socrates to complain. Alas, the conversation has trouble getting off the ground:

Socr.: Should we begin by being altogether in disagreement, or should we agree on something we could call a presupposition?…. What do you presuppose as your starting-point?

H.: Nothing at all.

Socr: That's quite something! So perhaps you don't start at all?

H.: I not start, I who have written 21 volumes?

Socr: Ye gods, what a hecatomb you have offered!

H.: But I start from nothing.

Socr.: Is that not something?

H.: No – on the contrary. That first makes its appearance in the conclusion of the whole, in the course of which I discuss science, world history etc.

Socr.: How might I be able to master this difficult task for many remarkable things may well be included which would show up my stupidity… You know that I did not even allow Polos to talk more than 5 minutes at a time, and you want to talk XXI volumes.

Information

Type
Articles
Information
Bulletin of the Hegel Society of Great Britain , Volume 31 , Issue 1 , Spring/Summer 2010, pp. 23 - 44
Copyright
Copyright © The Hegel Society of Great Britain 2010

References

Benson, H. (2002), ‘Problems with Socratic Method’ in Scott, G. A. (ed.), Does Socrates have a Method? Rethinking the Elenchus in Plato's Dialogues and Beyond. Pennsylvania, PA: Pennsylvania State Press.Google Scholar
Capel, L. M. (1971), ‘Introduction’ in Kierkegaard, S., The Concept of Irony, with Constant Reference to Socrates, trans. Capel, L. M.. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Daise, B. (1999), Kierkegaard's Socratic Art. Macon, GA: Mercer University Press.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. (1985), Hegel's Introduction to the lectures on the History of Philosophy, trans. Knox, T. M. and Miller, A. V.. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. (1991), The Encyclopaedia Logic, trans. Geraets, T. F., Suchting, W. A. and Harris, H. S.. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. (1995), Lectures on the History of Philosophy I: Greek Philosophy to Plato, trans. Haldane, E. S. and Simson, F. H.. London: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. (2006), Lectures on the History of Philosophy 1825-6 Volume II: Greek Philosophy, trans. Brown, R. F.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kierkegaard, S. (1909–1948), Papirer, ed. Heiberg, J, Kuhr, V. and Torsting, E., vol. VI. Copenhagen: Gyldendal.Google Scholar
Kierkegaard, S. (1967), Søren Kierkegaard's journals and Papers, trans. Hong, H. V. and Hong, E. H., I: A-E. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kierkegaard, S. (1989), The Concept of Irony with Continual Reference to Socrates; Schelling Lecture Notes, trans. Hong, H. V. and Hong, E. H.. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kierkegaard, S. (1992), Concluding Unscientific Postscript to the Philosophical Fragments, trans. Hong, H. V. and Hong, E. H.. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kofman, S. (1998), Socrates: Fictions of a Philosopher. London: Athlone.Google Scholar
Most, G. W. (2007), ‘Socrates in Hegel’ in Trapp, M. B. (ed.), Socrates in the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries. Hampshire: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Muench, P. (2005), ‘Kierkegaard's Socratic Point of View’ in Ahbel-Rappe, S. and Kamtekar, R. (eds.), A Companion to Socrates. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Pattison, G. (2002a), Kierkegaard's Upbuilding Discourses: Philosophy, Literature and Theology. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Pattison, G. (2002b), “Beyond the Grasp of Irony’ in Perkins, R. (ed.), International Kierkegaard Commentary: The Concept of Irony. Macon, GA: Mercer University Press.Google Scholar
Pattison, G. (2007), “A Simple Wise Man of Ancient Times: Kierkegaard on Socrates” in Trapp, M. B. (ed.), Socrates in the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries. Hampshire: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Robinson, R. (1962), Plato's Earlier Dialectic, 2 nd ed. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Rubenstein, M-J. (2001), ‘Kierkegaard's Socrates: A Venture in Evolutionary Theory’, Modern Theology 17: 442–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sinett, M. W. (2000), Socratic Dialectic in the Authorship of Søren Kierkegaard. Fife: Theology in Scotland.Google Scholar
Stewart, J. (2007), ‘Hegel: Kierkegaard's Reading and Use of Hegel's Primary Texts’ in Stewart, J. (ed.), Kierkegaard and his German Contemporaries, Tome I: Philosophy. Hampshire: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Swenson, D. F. (1983), ’Søren Kierkegaard – a Danish Socrates’ in Swenson, D. F., Something about Kierkegaard. Macon, GA: Mercer University Press.Google Scholar
Velkley, R. L. (2006) “On Possessed Individualism: Hegel, Socrates' Daimon, and the Modern State’, The Review of Metaphysics, 59:3:577–99.Google Scholar
Vlastos, G. (1983) ‘The Socratic Elenchus’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy I: 27–58.Google Scholar
Watts, D. (2007) “The Paradox of Beginning: Hegel, Kierkegaard and Philosophical Inquiry’, Inquiry 50:1: 5–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, R. (2002), “Hegel on Socrates and Irony” in Duquette, D. (ed.), Hegel's History of Philosophy: New Interpretations. Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar