Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-tnzcf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-15T07:54:21.200Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Competition Between Diffusion Processes and Hydrodynamical Instabilities in Stellar Envelopes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 March 2016

Gérard and
Sylvie Vauclair
Gérard
Affiliation:
DAPHE, Observatoire de Meudon, France
Sylvie Vauclair
Affiliation:
DAPHE, Observatoire de Meudon, France

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

Since the work of Michaud (1970), the abundance anomalies observed in the peculiar Ap and Am stars are increasingly believed to be a consequence of diffusion processes in stellar atmospheres or stellar envelopes. A number of the problems that seemed at first sight insoluble within the framework of diffusion processes have now been solved by it. Diffusion processes can, for example, account for anonalous helium isotopic ratios (Vauclair et al, 1974 (b)) and mercury isotopic ratios (Michaud et al, 1974). Quantitative results on abundance variations due to diffusion processes have been obtained (Michaud et al, 1976; Michaud, this conference; Alecian, 1976). They show that, in general, the relative abundance anomalies obtained from computation are close to the observed ones. It is now well established that the largest abundance anomalies observed in Ap stars (for rare earths) can be interpreted by diffusion processes with a satisfactory time scale, in a completely stable atmosphere. However, the predicted absolute abundance variations often exceed the observed ones, as in the case of Am stars. This suggests that the assumption of stability is not completely valid for the stellar gas: some kind of macroscopic motion, such as a meridional circulation or turbulence or both, must be at work and slow down the diffusion.

References

Alecian, G. 1976, Thèse de 3è Cycle, Université de Paris VII Google Scholar
Kobayashi, M., Osaki, Y. 1973, Publ. Astron. Soc. Japan 25, 495.Google Scholar
Kurtz, D. W. 1976, Astrophys.J., in press.Google Scholar
Lamers, H. J. G. L. M. 1976, IAU General AssemblyGoogle Scholar
Mestel, L. 1965, in Stellar Structure, éd. Aller, L. H. and D.B., McLaughlin, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, p. 465.Google Scholar
Michaud, G. 1970, Astrophys.J. 160, 641.Google Scholar
Michaud, G., Charland, Y., Vauclair, S., Vauclair, G. 1976, Astrophys.J. in press.Google Scholar
Michaud, G., Reeves, H., Charland, Y. 1974, Astron. Astrophys. 37, 313.Google Scholar
Osmer, P. S., Peterson, D. M. 1974, Astrophys.J. 187, 117.Google Scholar
Powell, A. L. T. 1972, Monthly Notices Roy. Astron. Soc. 155, 483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schatzman, E. 1969, Astron. Astrophys. 3, 331.Google Scholar
Smith, M. A., Parsons, S. B. 1975, Astrophys.J. Suppl. 29, 341.Google Scholar
Smith, M. A., Parsons, S. B. 1976, Astrophys.J. 205, 430.Google Scholar
Strittmatter, P. A., Norris, J. 1971, Astron. Astrophys. 15, 239.Google Scholar
Townsend, A. A. 1958, J. Fluid Mech. 4, 361.Google Scholar
Vauclair, G. 1976a, Astron. Astrophys. 50, 435.Google Scholar
Vauclair, G. 1976b, to be published.Google Scholar
Vauclair, G., Vauclair, S., Pamjatnikh, A. 1974a, Astron. Astrophys. 31, 63.Google Scholar
Vauclair, S. 1975a, in IAU Colloquium N° 32: Physics of Ap stars.Google Scholar
Vauclair, S. 1975b, Astron. Astrophys. 45, 233.Google Scholar
Vauclair, S., Michaud, G., Charland, Y. 1974b, Astron. Astrophys, 31, 381.Google Scholar
Zahn, J. P. 1974, in IAU Symp. N° 59: Stellar Instabilities and Evolution, Ledoux, et al,, Ed. Reidel Publishing Company, p. 185.Google Scholar