Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-rdgjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-09T13:39:10.481Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Eugenics and Ideology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 February 2009

Michael Freeden
Michael Freeden
Affiliation:
Mansfield College, Oxford
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In a recent communication to the Historical Journal, Greta Jones submitted a critique that was largely a commentary on my article ‘Eugenics and progressive thought: a study in ideological affinity’. I am taking the liberty of replying not only because my views have been seriously misrepresented by Dr Jones but also because I believe that she has failed to appreciate important questions of methodology that transcend the particular subject of eugenics and are worth further elaboration. I shall relate in turn to the issues she raises.

Information

Type
Communications
Information
The Historical Journal , Volume 26 , Issue 4 , December 1983 , pp. 959 - 962
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

1 Greta, Jones, ‘Eugenics and social policy between the wars’, Historical Journal, xxv, 3 (1982), 717–28.Google Scholar My article appeared in Historical Journal, XXII, 3 (1979), 645–71.Google Scholar

2 See e.g., Searle, G. R., ‘Eugenics and politics in Britain in the 1930s’, Annals of Science, XXXVI (1979), 159–69;CrossRefGoogle ScholarMackenzie, D., ‘Sociobiologies in competition: the biometrician-Mendelian debate’ in Webster, C. (ed.), Biology, medicine and society 1840–1940 (Cambridge University Press, 1981), pp. 243–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

3 Soloway, R. A., Birth control and the population question in England, 1877–1930 (Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 1982).Google Scholar

4 Stevenson, J. and Cook, C., The slump (London, 1977).Google Scholar

5 ‘Eugenics and progressive thought’, pp. 667–8.

6 Searle, ‘Eugenics and politics’, pp. 164–5. See also Werskey, G., The visible college (London, 1978), pp. 96–8 and passim, for interesting observations on the integration of eugenics into Haldane's socialism.Google Scholar

7 Searle, ‘Eugenics and polities’, pp. 163–6, 167–8, 169.

8 See e.g., Hobson, J. A., The problem of the unemployed (London, 1896), pp. 31, 137;Google ScholarHobson, , ‘A new theory of work’, British Friend, XIII (1904);Google ScholarMasterman, C. F. G., ‘The case for the insurance bill’, Nation, 9 Dec. 1911.Google Scholar I have discussed this in detail in my The new liberalism: an ideology of social reform (Oxford, 1978).Google Scholar

9 Beveridge, W. H., ‘The problem of the unemployed’, Sociological Papers (1906), 323–31,Google Scholar discussed in my The new liberalism, pp. 184–5. See also Harris, J., William Beveridge: a biography (Oxford, 1977), p. 86 and passim.Google Scholar