Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-54qdv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-09T15:07:55.616Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Breakthrough or Tyranny: Monotheism's Contested Implications

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 March 2013

Robert Gnuse
Affiliation:
Loyola University of New Orleans
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

Modern scholars often have pointed out that the emergence of monotheism has occasioned repressive behavior in history, including the suppression of women. The author seeks to distinguish between what monotheistic faith should inherently do, create egalitarianism, as opposed to how monotheistic faith has been used by political powers to create oppression. To this end, the author refers to metaphors previously introduced into the discussion by other scholars, which speak of “monotheism from above” as opposed to “monotheism from below.” The author also believes that monotheism, especially the Judeo-Christian tradition, is on an evolutionary trajectory, ever unfolding the egalitarian implications of its own message, and ultimately it may evolve and transform society so as to preclude its use as a tool of oppression. Thus, the author seeks to respond to some of the issues raised by critical scholars concerning the inherent repression of monotheistic faiths.

Information

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © The College Theology Society 2007