Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-wxvwp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-14T14:59:48.573Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Are Feminism and Competition Compatible?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2020

Amanda Cawston
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Contemporary feminist interest in the persistent underrepresentation of women in top professions suggests an implicit approval of the competition required to achieve these posts. Competition, however, seems to be in tension with feminist opposition to domination and oppression. This paper outlines the dimensions of this tension and examines three attempts to resolve the incompatibility. The first two try to separate the undesirable elements of competition from the positive by way of the competitiveness/competition and the challenge/scarcity distinctions. I argue that these distinctions fail to alleviate worries about competition, particularly in the context of the professions. Meanwhile, the third reconciliatory attempt offers a pragmatic argument for compatibilism based on the value of women's participation in the professions (and their associated competitions). Although this pragmatic argument has some merit, I argue that it significantly overestimates the amount of competition acceptable for feminist participation. The end result is that, within the context of the professions, competition remains fundamentally in tension with feminism.

Information

Type
Articles
Information
Hypatia , Volume 31 , Issue 1 , Winter 2016, pp. 204 - 220
Copyright
Copyright © 2016 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Ayim, Maryann. 1991. Dominance and affiliation: Paradigms in conflict. Informal Logic 13 (2): 79–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beebee, Helen. 2013. Women and deviance in philosophy. In Women in philosophy: What needs to change? ed. Hutchison, Katrina and Jenkins, Fiona. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Beebee, Helen, and Saul, Jenny. 2011. Women in philosophy in the UK. British Philosophical Association and Society for Women in Philosophy.Google Scholar
Bordo, Susan. 1993. Unbearable weight: Feminism, western culture, and the body. Berkeley and London: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Cambridge careers guide. 2014. Cambridge: The University of Cambridge. http://viewer.zmags.com/publication/b9c193f8#/b9c193f8/1 (accessed November 20, 2014).Google Scholar
Cohen, Daniel. 1995. Argument is war… and war is hell: Philosophy, education, and metaphors for argumentation. Informal Logic 17 (2): 177–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coleman, Jules. 1987. Competition and cooperation. Ethics 98 (1): 76–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davion, Victoria. 1987. Do good feminists compete? Hypatia 2 (2): 55–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dotson, Kristie. 2011. Concrete flowers: Contemplating the profession of philosophy. Hypatia 26 (2): 403–09.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duchamp, Linda Timmel. 1988. Desperately seeking approval: The importance of distinguishing between approval and recognition. Hypatia 3 (2): 163–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Govier, Trudy. 1999. The philosophy of argument. Newport News, Va.: Vale Press.Google Scholar
Haslanger, Sally. 2008. Changing the ideology and culture of philosophy: Not by reason (alone). Hypatia 23 (2): 210–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
hooks, bell. 1984. Feminist theory: From margin to center. Boston: South End Press.Google Scholar
Hutchison, Katrina and Jenkins, Fiona, eds. 2013. Women in philosophy: What needs to change? New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jenkins, Fiona. 2013. Singing the post‐discrimination blues: Notes for a critique of academic meritocracy. In Women in philosophy: What needs to change?, ed. Hutchison, Katrina and Jenkins, Fiona. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Keller, Evelyn Fox, and Moglen, Helene. 1987. Competition and feminism: Conflicts for academic women. Signs 12 (3): 493–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Longino, Helen. 1987. The ideology of competition. In Competition: A feminist taboo?, ed. Miner, Valerie and Longino, Helen. New York: The Feminist Press at the City University of New York.Google Scholar
Martin, Jane R. 1999. Coming of age in academe: Rekindling women's hopes and reforming the academy. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Matsumoto, Debra. 1987. One young woman in publishing. In Competition: A feminist taboo?, ed. Miner, Valerie and Longino, Helen. New York: The Feminist Press at the City University of New York.Google Scholar
Moulton, Janice. 1983/2004. A paradigm of philosophy: The adversary method. In Discovering reality, ed. Harding, Sandra and Hintikka, Merrill. London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
Power, Nina. 2009. One‐dimensional woman. Hants, UK: O Books.Google Scholar
Rivera, Berruz, Stephanie, . 2014. Inhabiting philosophical space: Reflections from the reasonably suspicious. Hypatia 29 (1): 182–88.Google Scholar
Rooney, Phyllis. 2010. Philosophy, adversarial argumentation, and embattled reason. Informal Logic 30 (3): 203–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rooney, Phyllis, and Hundleby, Catherine. 2010. Introduction: Reasoning for change. Informal Logic 30 (3): 194–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruddick, Sara. 1989/1995. Maternal thinking: Towards a politics of peace. Boston, Mass.: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Sandberg, Sheryl. 2013. Lean in: Women, work, and the will to lead. London: W. H. Allen.Google Scholar
Saul, Jennifer. 2013. Implicit bias, stereotype threat, and women in philosophy. In Women in philosophy: What needs to change?, ed. Hutchison, Katrina and Jenkins, Fiona. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Valian, Virginia. 1999. Why so slow?: The advancement of women. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Women at Cambridge. 1921. The Spectator, October 29 (4879): 551–52. http://archive.spectator.co.uk/article/29th-october-1921/7/women-at-cambridge (accessed March 16, 2015)Google Scholar
Woolf, Virginia. 1938/2005. Three guineas. In Selected works of Virginia Woolf. Hertfordshire, UK: Wordsworth Editions.Google Scholar
Yudkin, Marcia. 1982. Reflections on Woolf's Three Guineas. Women's Studies International Forum 5 (3/4): 263–69.Google Scholar