Hostname: page-component-6898cfcb55-cbk24 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-11T13:30:55.968Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Frege's Metaphors

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 March 2020

Andrea Nye
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The form of the sentence, as it is understood in contemporary semantics and linguistics, is functional. This paper interprets the metaphors in which Frege shows what the functional sentence means, arguing that Frege's sentence is neither an adequate translation of natural language nor of use in feminist theorizing.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Hypatia , Volume 7 , Issue 2: Special Issue: Philosophy and Language , Spring 1992, pp. 18 - 39
Copyright
Copyright © 1992 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Austin, J. L. 1962. How to do things with words. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Card, Claudia, ed. 1991. Feminist ethics. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar
Davidson, Donald. 1986. Truth and interpretation. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Dummett, Michael. 1973. Frege: Pkibsophy of language. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Dummett, Michael. 1981. The Interpretation of Frege's philosophy. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Frege, Gottlob. 1959. The foundations of arithmetic, Trans. Austin, J. L.Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Frege, Gottlob. 1970. Translations from the philosophical works of Gottlob Frege, ed. Black, Max and Geach, Peter. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Frege, Gottlob. 1972. Conceptual notation and related articles, ed. Bynum, Terrell Ward. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Frege, Gottlob. 1977. Logical investigations, ed. Geach, Peter. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Gilligan, Carol. 1982. In a different voice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hintikka, Merrill, and Hintikka, Jaakko. 1983. How can language be sexist? In Discovering reality, ed. Harding, Sandra and Hintikka, Merrill. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.Google Scholar
Nye, Andrea. 1990. Words of power: A feminist reading of the history of logic. New York: Routledge, Chapman, Hall.Google Scholar
Searle, John. 1969. Speech acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139173438CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sluga, Hans. 1980. Gottlob Frege. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Tarski, Alfred. 1944. The semantic conception of truth and the foundations of semantics. Philosophy and phenomenobgical Research 4: 341–75.Google Scholar
Turner, Frederick. 1980. Beyond geography. New York: Viking.Google Scholar