Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-mnklg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-12T21:14:07.129Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Is Neo‐Republicanism Bad for Women?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 March 2020

M. Victoria Costa
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The republican revival in political philosophy, political theory, and legal theory has produced an impressive range of novel interpretations of the historical figures of the republican tradition. It has also given rise to a variety of contemporary neo‐republican theories that build on its historical themes. Although there have been some feminist discussions of its historical representatives, neo‐republicanism has not generated a great deal of enthusiasm among feminists. The present paper examines Phillip Pettit's theory of freedom as nondomination in order to assess its potential usefulness for those with feminist goals. It defends Pettit's account of interpersonal domination from certain feminist objections, but argues that his account of state domination needs to be amended if it is fully to protect the interests of women and other groups.

Information

Type
Open Issue Content
Information
Hypatia , Volume 28 , Issue 4 , Fall 2013, pp. 921 - 936
Copyright
Copyright © 2013 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

I would like to thank Philip Pettit for guidance in interpreting his recent work, and María Julia Bertomeu, Joshua Gert, and two anonymous reviewers for comments on an earlier version of this paper.

References

Berlin, Isaiah. 2002. Two concepts of liberty. In Liberty, ed. Hardy, Henry. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bertomeu, María Julia, and Vollenweider, Camila. 2011. Ingreso ciudadano y equidad de género. Revista Internacional de Pensamiento Político 6 (1): 151–64.Google Scholar
Brennan, Samantha. 1999. Recent work in feminist ethics. Ethics 109 (4): 858–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Costa, M. Victoria. 2007. Freedom as non‐domination, normativity, and indeterminacy. Journal of Value Inquiry 41 (2–4): 291–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Costa, M. Victoria. 2011. Rawls, citizenship, and education. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Dryzek, John. 1996. Democracy in capitalist times: Ideals, limits, and struggles. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Friedman, Marilyn. 2008. Pettit's civic republicanism and male domination. In Republicanism and political theory, ed. Laborde, Cécile and Maynor, John. Malden, Mass.: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hirschmann, Nancy. 2003. The subject of liberty: Toward a feminist theory of freedom. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kittay, Eva Feder. 1999. Love's labor: Essays on women, equality, and dependency. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Laborde, Cécile. 2008. Critical republicanism: The hijab controversy and political philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mackenzie, Catriona, and Stoljar, Natalie, eds. 2000. Relational autonomy: Feminist perspectives on autonomy, agency, and the social self. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mansbridge, Jane, and Okin, Susan. 1993. Feminism. In A companion to contemporary political philosophy, ed. Goodin, Robert and Pettit, Philip. Malden, Mass.: Blackwell.Google Scholar
McMahon, Christopher. 2005. The indeterminacy of republican policy. Philosophy and Public Affairs 33 (1): 67–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mill, John Stuart. 1851/1984. Statement on marriage. In The collected works of John Stuart Mill, vol. 21: Essays on equality, law, and education, ed. Robson, John M.Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Okin, Susan M. 1989. Justice, gender and the family. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Olsen, Frances. 1984–1985. The myth of state intervention in the family. University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform 18 (4): 835–64.Google Scholar
Pateman, Carole. 2007. Why republicanism? Basic Income Studies 2 (2): 1–6.Google Scholar
Pettit, Philip. 1999. Republicanism: A theory of freedom and government. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pettit, Philip. 2004. The common good. In Justice and democracy: Essays for Brian Barry, ed. Dowding, Keith, Goodin, Robert E. and Pateman, Carole. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pettit, Philip. 2006. The determinacy of republican policy: A reply to McMahon. Philosophy and Public Affairs 34 (3): 275–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pettit, Philip. 2007a. Free persons and free choices. History of Political Thought 28 (4): 709–18.Google Scholar
Pettit, Philip. 2007b. A republican right to basic income? Basic Income Studies 2 (2): 1–8.Google Scholar
Pettit, Philip. 2008. The basic liberties. In The legacy of H. L. A. Hart, ed. Kramer, Mathew, Grant, Claire, Colburn, Ben and Hatzistavron, Anthony. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pettit, Philip. 2009. Law and liberty. In Legal republicanism: National and international perspectives, ed. Besson, Samantha and Luis Martí, José. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Phillips, Anne. 2000. Feminism and republicanism: Is this a plausible alliance? Journal of Political Philosophy 8 (2): 279–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pocock, J. G. A. 1975. The Machiavellian moment: Florentine political thought and the Atlantic republican tradition. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. 2001. Justice as fairness: A restatement, ed. Kelly, Erin. Cambridge, Mass.: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Richardson, Henry. 2002. Democratic autonomy: Public reasoning about the ends of policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Skinner, Quentin. 1978. The foundations of modern political thought. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sandel, Michael. 1996. Democracy's discontent: America in search of a public philosophy. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Sunstein, Cass. 1988. Beyond the republican revival. Yale Law Journal 97 (8): 1539–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar