Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-wxvwp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-15T19:10:04.530Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Liberalism, Adaptive Preferences, and Gender Equality

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2020

Ann Levey
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

I argue that a gendered division of labor is often the result of choices by women that count as fully voluntary because they are an expression of preferences and commitments that reflect women's understanding of their own good. Since liberalism has a commitment to respecting fully voluntary choices, it has a commitment to respecting these gendered choices. I suggest that justified political action may require that we fail to respect some people's considered choices.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Hypatia , Volume 20 , Issue 4: Special Issue: Analytic Feminism , Fall 2005, pp. 127 - 143
Copyright
Copyright © 2005 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Babbitt, Susan. 1995. Impossible dreams: Rationality, integrity, and moral imagination. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Benson, Paul. 1991. Autonomy and oppressive socialization. Social Theory and Practice 17 (3): 385–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crittenden, Ann. 2001. The price of motherhood: Why the most important job in the world is still the least valued. New York: Henry Holt and Company.Google Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald. 1981. What is equality? Part 2: Equality of resources. Philosophy and Public Affairs 10 (4): 283–345.Google Scholar
Elster, Jon. 1983. Sour grapes: Studies in the subversion of rationality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frye, Marilyn. 1983. The politics of reality. Freedom, Calif.: Crossing Press.Google Scholar
Galston, William. 1991. Liberal purposes. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerson, Katherine. 1985. Hard choices: How women decide about work, career, and motherhood. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Hill, Thomas Jr. 1973. Servility and self‐respect. The Monist 57 (1): 87–194.10.5840/monist197357135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kernohan, Andrew. 1998. Liberalism, equality, and cultural oppression. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCrate, Elaine. 1988. Gender Difference: The role of endogenous preferences and collective action. American Economic Review 78 (2): 235–239.Google Scholar
MacKinnon, Catharine. 1987. Feminism unmodified: Discourses on life and law. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
MacKinnon, Catharine. 1989. Toward afeminist theory of the state. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart. 1999. On liberty, ed.Alexander, Edward. Peterborough, Ont.: Broadview PressGoogle Scholar
Mill, John Stuart. 2000. The subjection of women. Peterborough, Ont.: Broadview Press.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, Martha. 2001. Adaptive preferences and women's options. Economics and Philosophy 17: 67–88.10.1017/S0266267101000153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Okin, Susan Moller. 1989. Justice, gender, and the family. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Picard, Andre. 2000. Critical care: Canadian nurses speak for change. New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. 1999. The idea of public reason revisited. In Collected papers, ed. Freeman, Samuel. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press. First published in University of Chicago Law Review 64: 765–807.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. 1993. Political liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Saul, Jennifer. 2003. Feminism: Issues and arguments. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sunstein, Cass. 1990. Preferences and politics. Toronto: University of Toronto, Faculty of Law. Legal theory workshop series.Google Scholar
Walter, Natasha. 1999. The new feminism. London: Virago Press.Google Scholar
Vujicic, Marko, Zum, Pascal, Diallo, Khassoum, Adams, Orvill, and Mario, R Dal Poz. 2004. The role of wages in the migration of health care professionals from developing countries. Human Resources for Health 2: 3. http://www.human‐resources‐health.com/content/2/1/3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Walker, John D. 1995. Liberalism, consent, and the problem of adaptive preferences. Social Theory and Practice 21 (3): 457–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar