Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-2n9c9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-13T15:06:06.774Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Misfits: A Feminist Materialist Disability Concept

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 March 2020

Rosemarie Garland-Thomson
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article offers the critical concept misfit in an effort to further think through the lived identity and experience of disability as it is situated in place and time. The idea of a misfit and the situation of misfitting that I offer here elaborate a materialist feminist understanding of disability by extending a consideration of how the particularities of embodiment interact with the environment in its broadest sense, to include both its spatial and temporal aspects. The interrelated dynamics of fitting and misfitting constitute a particular aspect of world-making involved in material-discursive becoming. The essay makes three arguments: the concept of misfit emphasizes the particularity of varying lived embodiments and avoids a theoretical generic disabled body; the concept of misfit clarifies the current feminist critical conversation about universal vulnerability and dependence; the concept of misfitting as a shifting spatial and perpetually temporal relationship confers agency and value on disabled subjects.

Information

Type
Confronting Dis-Abling Norms
Information
Hypatia , Volume 26 , Issue 3: Special Issue: Ethics of Embodiment , Summer 2011, pp. 591 - 609
Copyright
Copyright © 2011 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Alcoff, Linda Martín. 2000. Who's afraid of identity politics? In Reclaiming identities: Realist theory and the predicament of the postmodern, ed. Moya, Paula M. L. and Hames‐García, Michael R.Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Alcoff, Linda Martín. 2006. Visible identities: Race, gender, and the self. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arendt, Hannah. 1998. The human condition. 2nd edition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barad, Karen Michelle. 2007. Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Barad, Karen Michelle. 2008. Post‐humanist performativity: Toward an understanding of how matter comes to matter. In Material feminisms, ed. Alaimo, Stacy and Hekman, SusanIndiana University Press.Google Scholar
Barnes, Colin, Barton, Len, and Oliver, Mike. 2002. Disability studies today. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Brown, Wendy. 1993. Wounded attachments. Political Theory 21 (3): 390–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler, Judith. 1993. Bodies that matter: On the discursive limits of “sex.” New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Butler, Judith. 2004. Precarious life: The powers of mourning and violence. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Bynum, Caroline Walker. 1999. National Endowment for the Humanities Jefferson Lecture in the Humanities, March 22. Washington, D.C. http://www.neh.gov/news/archive/19990322b.html (accessed February 9, 2011).Google Scholar
Canguilhem, George. 1991. The normal and the pathological. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Clare, Eli. 1999. Exile and pride: Disability, queerness, and liberation. Cambridge, Mass.: South End Press.Google Scholar
Collins, Patricia Hill. 2000. Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Davis, Lennard J. 1995. Enforcing normalcy: Disability, deafness, and the body. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Dubois, W. E. B. 2008. The souls of black folk. Radford, Va.: Wilder Publications.Google Scholar
Fausto‐Sterling, Anne. 2000. Sexing the body: Gender politics and the construction of sexuality. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Fineman, Martha Albertson. 2005. The autonomy myth: A theory of dependency. New York: The New Press.Google Scholar
Fineman, Martha Albertson. 2008. The vulnerable subject: Anchoring equality in the human condition. Yale Journal of Law and Feminism 20 (1): 1–23.Google Scholar
Garland‐Thomson, Rosemarie, ed. 1996. Freakery: Cultural spectacles of the extraordinary body. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Garland‐Thomson, Rosemarie. 1997. Extraordinary bodies: Figuring physical disability in American culture and literature. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Garland‐Thomson, Rosemarie. 1999. Narratives of deviance and delight: Staring at Julia Pastrana. The Extraordinary Lady.” In Beyond the binary, ed. Powell, T.New Brunswick, N.J.: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Garland‐Thomson, Rosemarie. 2005. Welcoming the unbidden: The case for conserving human biodiversity. In What democracy looks like, ed. Lang, A. S. and Tichi, C.New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Garland‐Thomson, Rosemarie. 2009. Staring: How we look. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gilman, Sander. 1998. Creating beauty to cure the soul: Race and psychology in the shaping of aesthetic surgery. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving. 1980. Behavior in public places: Notes on the social organization of gatherings. Westport, Conn.: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
Grosz, Elizabeth. 1994. Volatile bodies: Toward a corporeal feminism. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. 1991. The structural transformation of the public sphere: An inquiry into a category of bourgeois society. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. 2004. Public space and political public sphere: The biographical roots of two motifs in my thought. Commemorative lecture. Kyoto, Nov. 11. http://homepage.mac.com/gedavis/JH/Kyoto_lecture_Nov_2004.pdf (accessed February 9, 2011).Google Scholar
Hacking, Ian. 1990. The taming of chance. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haraway, Donna. 2003. The Haraway reader. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Harding, Sandra. 1986. The instability of the analytical categories of feminist theory. Signs: Journal of Women and Culture in Society 11 (4): 645–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keller, Evelyn Fox. 2002. The century of the gene. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Kittay, Eva Feder. 1999. Love's labor: Essays on women, equality, and dependency. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Linton, Simi. 1998. Claiming disability: Knowledge and identity. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Lugones, Maria. 1987. Playfulness, “world”‐traveling, and loving perception. Hypatia 2 (2): 3–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McRuer, Robert. 2006. Crip theory. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Miller, William Ian. 1997. The anatomy of disgust. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Mitchell, David, and Snyder, Sharon. 2006. Cultural locations of disability. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Mohanty, Satya. 2000. The epistemic status of cultural identity: On Beloved and the postcolonial condition. In Reclaiming identities: Realist theory and the predicament of the postmodern, ed. Moya, Paula M. L. and Hames‐García, Michael R.Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Moya, Paula. 2000. Postmodernism, “realism,” and the politics of identity: Cherríe Moraga and Chicana feminism. In Reclaiming identities: Realist theory and the predicament of the postmodern, ed. Moya, Paula M. L. and Hames‐García, Michael R.Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, Martha. 2006. Frontiers of justice: Disability, nationality, species membership. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Parens, Erik, and Asch, Adrienne. 2000. Prenatal testing and disability rights. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Rich, Adrienne. 1986. Notes toward a politics of location. In Blood, bread, and poetry: Selected prose 1979–1985. London: Little Brown and Company.Google Scholar
Rubin, Gayle. 1975. The traffic in women: Notes on the “political economy” of sex. In Toward an Anthropology of Women, ed. Reiter, Rayna R.New York: New York Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
Sacks, Harvey. 1984. On doing “being ordinary.” In Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis, ed. Atkinson, J. M. and Heritage, J.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Saxton, Marsha. 1998. Disability rights and selective abortion. In Abortion wars: A half century of struggle (1950–2000), ed. Solinger, Ricky. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Schweik, Susan. 2009. The ugly laws. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Scully, Jackie Leach. 2008. Disability bioethics: Moral bodies, moral difference. New York: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Shapiro, Joseph. 1993. No pity: People with disabilities forging a new civil rights movement. New York: Times Books/Random House.Google Scholar
Siebers, Tobin. 2008. Disability theory. Ann Arbor, Mich.: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, Carol. 1999. Defining disability: The social model. In Female forms: Experiencing and understanding disability. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.Google Scholar
Turner, Bryan S. 2006. Vulnerability and human rights. University Park: Penn State University Press.Google Scholar
United Nations convention on the rights of persons with disabilities. http://www.un.org/disabilities/default.asp?id=260 (accessed February 10, 2011).Google Scholar
Warner, Michael. 2000. The trouble with normal. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Wendell, Susan. 1996. The rejected body: Feminist philosophical reflections on disability. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Wilson, Elizabeth. 2004. Gut feminism. differences: A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies 15 (3): 66–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar