Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-2n9c9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-15T12:01:45.624Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Philosophy in Schools: Can Early Exposure Help Solve Philosophy's Gender Problem?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2020

Gina Schouten
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this article, I explore a new reason in favor of precollegiate philosophy: It could help narrow the persistent gender disparity within the discipline. I catalog some of the most widely endorsed explanations for the underrepresentation of women in philosophy and argue that, on each hypothesized explanation, precollegiate philosophy instruction could help improve our discipline's gender balance. Explanations I consider include stereotype threat, gendered philosophical intuitions, inhospitable disciplinary environment, lack of same‐sex role models for women students in philosophy, and conflicting “schemas” for philosophy and femininity. I argue that, insofar as some combination of these hypothesized explanations accounts for some portion of the underrepresentation of women in philosophy, those of us concerned to make things better have reason to participate in and promote efforts to share philosophy with younger students.

Information

Type
Articles
Information
Hypatia , Volume 31 , Issue 2 , Spring 2016, pp. 275 - 292
Copyright
Copyright © 2016 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Adleberg, T., Thompson, M., and Nahmias, E. 2014. Do men and women have different philosophical intuitions? Further data. Philosophical Psychology 28 (5): 615–41.Google Scholar
Antony, Louise. 2012. Different voices or perfect storm: Why are there so few women in philosophy? Journal of Social Philosophy 43 (3): 227–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aronson, J., Fried, C., and Good, C. 2002. Reducing the effects of stereotype threat on African American college students by shaping theories of intelligence. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 38 (2): 113–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baron, S., Dougherty, T., and Miller, K. 2015. Why is there female under‐representation among philosophy majors? Evidence of a preuniversity effect. Ergo 2 (14): 329–65.Google Scholar
Brennan, Samantha. 2013. Rethinking the moral significance of micro‐inequities: The case of women in philosophy. In Women in philosophy: What needs to change, ed. Hutchison, K. and Jenkins, F.Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Brighouse, Harry. 2008. The role of philosophical thinking in teaching controversial issues. In Philosophy in schools, ed. Hand, M. and Winstanley, C.New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Buckwalter, Wesley, and Stich, Stephen. 2014. Gender and philosophical intuition. In Experimental philosophy, vol. 2, ed. Knobe, J. and Nichols, S.Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Calhoun, Cheshire. 2009. The undergraduate pipeline problem. Hypatia 24 (2): 216–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calhoun, Cheshire. 2015. Precluded interests. Hypatia 30 (2): 475–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, G. L., Garcia, J., Apfel, N., and Master, A. 2006. Reducing the racial achievement gap: A social‐psychological intervention. Science 313 (5791): 1307–10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cohen, G. L., and Garcia, J. 2008. Identity, belonging, and achievement: A model, interventions, implications. Current Directions in Psychological Science 17 (6): 365–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conroy, James. 2008. Philosophy, wisdom, and reading great books. In Philosophy in schools, ed. Hand, M. and Winstanley, C.New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Dougherty, Tom, Baron, Samuel, and Miller, Kristie. 2015a. Female under‐representation among philosophy majors: A map of the hypotheses and a survey of the evidence. Feminist Philosophy Quarterly 1 (1): 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dougherty, Tom, Baron, Samuel, and Miller, Kristie. 2015b. Why do female students leave philosophy? The story from Sydney. Hypatia 30 (2): 467–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dweck, C. 2006. Is math a gift? Beliefs that put females at risk. In Why aren't more women in science? Top researchers debate the evidence, ed. Ceci, S. and Williams, W.Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Elizaga, R., and Markman, K. 2008. Peers and performance: How in‐group and out‐group comparisons moderate stereotype threat effects. Current Psychology 27 (4): 290–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardner, Susan. 2009. Love thy neighbor? Maybe not. In Children philosophize worldwide, ed. Marsal, E., Dobashi, T., and Weber, B.Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Glaser, Jen. 2009. Educating for citizenship and social justice. In Children philosophize worldwide, ed. Marsal, E., Dobashi, T., and Weber, B.Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Glueck, Lynn, and Brighouse, Harry. 2008. Philosophy in children's literature. In Philosophy in schools, ed. Hand, M. and Winstanley, C.New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Good, C., Aronson, J., and Inzlicht, M. 2003. Improving adolescents' standardized test performance: An intervention to reduce the effects of stereotype threat. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology 24 (6): 645–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gregory, Maughn. 2009. Ethics education and the practice of wisdom. Teaching Ethics 9 (2): 105–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hand, Michael. 2008. Can children be taught philosophy? In Philosophy in schools, ed. Hand, M. and Winstanley, C.New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Hannam, Patricia, and Echeverria, Eugenio. 2009. Philosophy with teenagers: Nurturing a moral imagination for the 21st century. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Haslanger, Sally. 2008. Changing the ideology and culture of philosophy: Not by reason (alone). Hypatia 23 (2): 210–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hugeut, Pascal, and Regner, Isabelle. 2007. Stereotype threat among schoolgirls in quasi‐ordinary classroom circumstances. Journal of Educational Psychology 99 (3): 545–60.Google Scholar
Law, Stephen. 2008. Religion and philosophy in schools. In Philosophy in schools, ed. Hand, M. and Winstanley, C.New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Lee, C. J., and Schunn, C. D. 2010. Philosophy journal practices and opportunities for bias. APA Newsletter on Feminism and Philosophy 10 (1): 5–10.Google Scholar
Leslie, S. J., Cimpian, A., Meyer, M., and Freeland, E. 2015. Expectations of brilliance underlie gender distributions across academic disciplines. Science 347 (6219): 262–65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lipman, Matthew. 1974. Harry Stottlemeier's discovery. Upper Montclair, N.J.: Institute for the Advancement of Philosophy for Children.Google Scholar
Lipman, Matthew. 1976. Lisa. Upper Montclair, N.J.: Institute for the Advancement of Philosophy for Children.Google Scholar
Lipman, Matthew. 1991. Thinking in education. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lockwood, P. 2006. Someone like me can be successful: Do college students need same‐gender role models? Psychology of Women Quarterly 30 (1): 36–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maiers, Angela. 2013. Reframing, rebranding and re‐energizing the STEM conversation. Huffington Post. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/angela-maiers/reframing-rebranding-re-energizing-stem_b_2921136.html (accessed December 2, 2014).Google Scholar
Martens, A., Johns, M., Greenberg, J., and Schimel, J. 2006. Combating stereotype threat: The effect of self‐affirmation on women's intellectual performance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 42 (2): 236–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marx, D. M., and Roman, J. S. 2002. Female role models: Protecting female students' math test performance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 28 (9): 1185–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marx, D. M., Stapel, D. A., and Muller, D. 2005. We can do it: The interplay of construal orientation and social comparisons under threat. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 88 (3): 432–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matthews, Gareth B. 1980. Philosophy and the young child. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Matthews, Gareth B. 1984. Dialogues with children. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Matthews, Gareth B. 2008. Getting beyond the deficit conception of childhood: Thinking philosophically with children. In Philosophy in schools, ed. Hand, M. and Winstanley, C.New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
McCall, Catherine. 2009. Transforming thinking: Philosophical inquiry in the primary and secondary classroom. Oxford and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
McKinnon, Rachel. 2014. Stereotype threat and attributional ambiguity for trans women. Hypatia 29 (4): 857–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miyake, A., Kost‐Smith, L. E., Finkelstein, N. D., Pollock, S. J., Cohen, G. L., and Ito, T. A. 2010. Reducing the gender achievement gap in college science: A classroom study of values affirmation. Science 330 (6008): 1234–37.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moulton, Janice. 1993. A paradigm of philosophy: The adversary method. In Discovering reality, ed. Harding, S. and Hintikka, M. B.Hingham, Mass.: D. Reidel.Google Scholar
Murris, Karin. 2008. Autonomous and authentic thinking through philosophy with picturebooks. In Philosophy in schools, ed. Hand, M. and Winstanley, C.New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Paxton, Molly, Figdor, Carrie, and Tiberius, Valerie. 2012. Quantifying the gender gap: An empirical study of the underrepresentation of women in philosophy. Hypatia 27 (4): 949–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Philips, M. 1996. All must have prizes. London: Warner Books.Google Scholar
Pring, Richard. 2008. Philosophy and moral education. In Philosophy in schools, ed. Hand, M. and Winstanley, C.New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Pritchard, Michael S. 1996. Reasonable children. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar
Sacks, J. 1997. The politics of hope. London: Jonathan Cape.Google Scholar
Saul, Jennifer. 2013. Implicit bias, stereotype threat and women in philosophy. In Women in philosophy: What needs to change, ed. Hutchison, K. and Jenkins, F.Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schiebinger, L. L. 2001. Has feminism changed science?. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Schouten, Gina. 2015. The stereotype threat hypothesis: An assessment from the philosopher's armchair, for the philosopher's classroom. Hypatia 30 (2): 450–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schrag, Francis. 1985. A response to Gareth Matthews. Journal of Thought 20 (2): 21–24.Google Scholar
Shih, M., Pittinsky, T., and Ambady, N. 1999. Stereotype susceptibility: Identity salience and shifts in quantitative performance. Psychological Science 10 (1): 80–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Splitter, Laurance, and Sharp, Ann M. 1995. Teaching for better thinking: The classroom community of inquiry. Hawthorn, Vic.: Australian Council for Educational Research.Google Scholar
Steele, C. M. 1997. A threat in the air: How stereotypes shape intellectual identity and performance. American Psychologist 52 (6): 613–29.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stout, Jane G., Dasgupta, Nilanjana, Hunsinger, Matthew, and McManus, Melissa A. 2010. STEMing the tide: Using ingroup experts to inoculate women's self‐concept in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 100 (2): 255–70.Google Scholar
Valian, Virginia. 1998. Why so slow? The advancement of women. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Wartenberg, Thomas E. 2009. Big ideas for little kids. Lanham, Md.: Rowman and Littlefield Education.Google Scholar
White, J. P. 1992. The roots of philosophy. In The impulse to philosophise, ed. Phillips Griffiths, A.Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Winstanley, Carrie. 2008. Philosophy and the development of critical thinking. In Philosophy in schools, ed. Hand, M. and Winstanley, C.New York: Continuum.Google Scholar