No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Abstract
This essay is a critical review of Sandra Harding's The Science Question in Feminism. Her text constitutes a monumental effort to capture an overview of recent feminist critique of science and to develop a feminist dialectical and materialist conception of the history of masculinist science. In this analysis of Harding's work, the organizing categories as well as the main assumptions of the text are reconstructed for closer examination within the context of modern feminist critique of science and feminist theory in general. Although a postive review of Harding's text is presented, questions are raised concerning the adequacy of socialist feminist assumptions for such a project, the limitations of Harding's theorization of gender, and the appropriateness of “postmodernism” as a final category of residence.
Information
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Hypatia , Volume 3 , Issue 1: Special Issue: Feminism and Science, Part 2 , Spring 1988 , pp. 157 - 168
- Copyright
- Copyright © 1988 by Hypatia, Inc.
References
Allen, Jeffner. 1986. Lesbian philosophy: Explorations. Palo Alto: Institute for Lesbian Studies.Google Scholar
Flax, Jane. 1978. Political philosophy and the patriarchal unconscious: A psychoanalytic perspective on epistemology and metaphysics. In Discovering reality: Feminist perspectives on epistemology, metaphysics, methodology, and philosophy of science, ed. Harding, S. and Hintikka, M. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
Frye, Marilyn. 1983. The politics of reality: Essays in feminist theory. New York: The Crossing Press.Google Scholar
Harding, Sandra. 1986. The science question in feminism. New York: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Harding, Sandra. 1987. The method question. Hypatia: A Journal of Feminist Philosophy 2 (3):19–35.10.1111/j.1527-2001.1987.tb01339.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartsock, Nancy. 1983. The feminist standpoint: Developing the ground for a specifically feminist historical materialism. In Discovering reality. See Flax 1978.Google Scholar
Irigaray, Luce. 1987. Is the subject of science sexed? Trans. Carol Bove. Hypatia: A Journal of Feminist philosophy 2 (3):65–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keller, Evelyn Fox 1984. Reflections on gender and science. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Marks, Elaine and De Courtivron, Isabelle, eds. 1980. New French feminisms. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl. 1964. Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts, ed. Struik, D.New York: International Publishers.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl. 1970. The German ideology, ed. Arthur, C.J.New York: International Publishers.Google Scholar
McKinnon, Catherine. 1982. Feminism, marxism, method, and the state: An agenda for theory. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 7 (3).Google Scholar
Rich, Adrienne. 1980. Compulsory heterosexuality and lesbian existence. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 5 (4).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose, Hilary. 1983. Hand, brain and heart: A feminist epistemology for the natural sciences. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 9 (1).10.1086/494025CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Dorothy. 1974. Women's perspective as a radical critique of sociology. Sociological Inquiry 44.Google Scholar
Smith, Dorothy. 1979. A sociology for women. In The prism of sex: Essays in the sociology of knowledge, ed. Serman, J. and Beck, T.T. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
- 9
- Cited by