Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-8r8nv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-09T11:06:37.448Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Standpoint and Creativity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 March 2020

Miriam Solomon
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Information

Type
Symposium on Standpoint Theory
Information
Hypatia , Volume 24 , Issue 4 , Fall 2009 , pp. 226 - 237
Copyright
Copyright © 2009 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Boden, Margaret. 1991. The creative mind: Myths and mechanisms. London: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Boden, Margaret. ed. 1994. Dimensions of creativity. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1992. Invitation to a reflexive sociology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Campbell, Donald. 1960. Blind variation and selective retention in creative thought as in other knowledge processes. Psychological Review 67 (6): 380–400.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Collins, Patricia Hill. 1986. Learning from the outsider within: The sociological significance of black feminist thought. Social Problems 33 (6): 14–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, Patricia Hill. 1997. Comment on Hekman's “Truth and method: Feminist standpoint theory revisited”: Where's the power. Signs 22 (2): 375–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Csikszentmihalyi, Mihaly. 1999. Implications of a systems perspective for the study of creativity. In Handbook of creativity, ed. Sternberg, Robert. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 313–35.Google Scholar
De Bono, Edward. 1970. Lateral thinking. New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Eysenck, Hans J. 1994. The measurement of creativity. In Dimensions of creativity, ed. Boden, Margaret. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, pp. 199–242.Google Scholar
Feist, Gregory. 1999. The influence of personality and artistic and scientific creativity. In Handbook of creativity, ed. Sternberg, Robert. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 273–96.Google Scholar
Gardner, Howard. 1993. The creators of the modern era. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Gardner, Howard. 1994. The creator's patterns. In Dimensions of creativity, ed. Boden, Margaret. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, pp. 143–58.Google Scholar
Guilford, J.P. 1950. Creativity. American Psychologist 5: 444–54.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haraway, Donna. 1991. Simians, cyborgs, and women: The reinvention of nature. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Harding, Sandra. 1986. The science question in feminism. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Harding, Sandra. 1991. Whose science? Whose knowledge? Thinking from women's lives. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Harding, Sandra. ed. 2004. The feminist standpoint theory reader: Intellectual and political controversies. New York and London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hartsock, Nancy. 1983. The feminist standpoint: Developing the ground for a specifically feminist historical materialism. In Discovering reality: Feminist perspectives on epistemology, metaphysics, methodology, and philosophy of science, ed. Harding, Sandra and Hintikka, Merrill. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 283–310.Google Scholar
Hempel, Carl. 1966. Philosophy of natural science. Foundations of philosophy series. Englewood, N.J.: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Holyoak, Keith, and Thagard, Paul. 1996. Mental leaps: Analogy in creative thought. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hull, David. 1988. Science as a process: An evolutionary account of the social and conceptual development of science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahneman, Daniel, Slovic, Paul, and Tversky, Amos, eds. 1982. Judgments under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaufman, James, and Sternberg, Robert, eds. 2006. The international handbook of creativity. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keller, Evelyn Fox. 1983. A feeling for the organism: The life and work of Barbara McClintock. New York: W. H. Freeman and Co.Google Scholar
Keller, Evelyn Fox. 1985. Reflections on gender and science. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Koestler, Arthur. 1964. The act of creation. New York: McMillan.Google Scholar
Nisbett, Richard, and Ross, Lee. 1980. Human inference: Strategies and shortcomings of social judgment. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice‐Hall.Google Scholar
Rose, Hilary. 1983. Hand, brain and heart: A feminist epistemology for the natural sciences. Signs 9 (1): 73–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Dorothy. 1974. Women's perspective as a radical critique of sociology. Sociological Inquiry 44: 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sternberg, Robert, ed. 1999. Handbook of creativity. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Woolgar, Steve. 1988. Science: The very idea. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Wylie, Alison. 2004. Why standpoint matters. In The feminist standpoint theory reader: Intellectual and political controversies, ed. Harding, Sandra. New York and London: Routledge, pp. 339–51.Google Scholar