Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)
Article purchase
Temporarily unavailable
References
Adams, P., and Minson., J.1978. The subject of feminism. M/F2: 49–61.Google Scholar
Alcoff, Linda. 1988. Cultural feminism versus post‐structuralism: The identity crisis in feminist theory. Signs13(3): 405–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bal, Mieke. 1985. De theorie van vertellen en verhalen. Muiderberg: Dick Coutinho.Google Scholar
Bal, Mieke. 1988. Death and dissymetry. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Barthes, Roland. 1966. Critique et vérité. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
de Beauvoir, Simone. 1949. Le deuxieme sexe. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Benhabib, Seyla and Cornell, Drucilla, eds. 1987. Feminism as critique. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Benjamin, Jessica. 1986. A desire of one's own. In Feminist studies/critical studies. De Lauretis, Teresa, ed. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Benjamin, Jessica. 1988. The bonds of love. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
Bleier, Ruth. 1984. Gender and science. New York: Pergamon.Google Scholar
Bowles, Gloria, and Duelli‐Klein, Renate. 1983. Theories of women's studies. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Braidotti, Rosi. 1991. Patterns of dissonance: A study of women in contemporary philosophy. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Brennan, Teresa. 1989. Between feminism and psychoanalysis. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Broun, Margot. 1988. Veertien jaar vrouwenstudies in Nederland: Een overzicht. Groningen: RION.Google Scholar
Eisenstein, Hester and Jardine, Alice. 1980. The Future of difference. Boston: G. K. Hall.Google Scholar
Flax, Jane. 1987. Postmodernism and gender relations in feminist theory. Signs12(4): 621–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1966. Les mots et les choses. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1976. Histoire de a sexualité. Vol. 1. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1977a. L'ordre du discours. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1977b. Surveiller et punir. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1984. Histoire de la sexualité. Vol. 2, 3. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Gallop, Jane. 1988. Thinking through the body. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gould, Carol and Wartofsky, Marx. 1976. Women and philosophy. New York: Capricorn Books.Google Scholar
Greene, Gayle and Kahn, Coppelia, eds. 1985. Making a difference. New York: Methuen.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffiths, Morwenna, and Whitford, Margaret. 1989. Feminist perspectives in philosophy. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Grimshaw, Jean. 1986. Feminist philosophers. Brighton: Wheatsheaf. Also published as Philosophy and feminist thinking. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Haraway, Donna. 1983. A manifesto for cyborgs: science technology and socialist feminism in the 1980s. Socialist review80: 65–107.Google Scholar
Haraway, Donna. 1988. Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Feminist Studies14(3): 575–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harding, Sandra. 1986a. The science question in feminism. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Harding, Sandra. 1986b. Feminism and methodology. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Hubbard, Ruth and Lowe, Marian. 1983. Woman's nature: Rationalizations of inequality. London: Pergamon.Google Scholar
Hull, Gloria T, Scott, Patricia Bell, and Smith, Barbara. 1982. All the women are white, all the blacks are men, but some of us are brave: Black women's studies: Old Westbury, N.Y.: The Feminist Press.Google Scholar
Irigaray, Luce. 1974. Spéculum de l'autre femme. Paris: Minuit.Google Scholar
Irigaray, Luce. 1977. Ce sexe qui'en est pas un. Paris: Minuit.Google Scholar
Irigaray, Luce. 1984. L'éthique de la differénce sexuelle. Paris: Minuit.Google Scholar
Irigaray, Luce. 1988. Sexe et parente. Paris: Minuit.Google Scholar
Irigaray, Luce. 1989. Le temps de la differénce. Paris: Poche.Google Scholar
Jardine, Alice. 1985. Gynesis. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Jardine, Alice and Smith, Paul, eds. 1987. Men in feminism. New York: Methuen.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keller, Evelyn Fox. 1985. Reflections on gender and science. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Keller, Evelyn Fox. 1983. A feeling for the organism. San Francisco: Freeman.Google Scholar
Kelly, Joan. 1979. The doubled vision of feminist theory. Feminist Studies5(1): 217–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ketchum, Sarah Ann. 1980. Female culture, womanculture, and conceptual change: Toward a philosophy of women's studies. Social Theory and Practice6(2): 151–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kofman, Sarah. 1982. Le respect des femmes. Paris: Galilée.Google Scholar
Kristeva, Julia. 1980. Desire in language: A semiotic approach to literature and art. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Kristeva, Julia. 1980. Women's time. In Feminist theory: A critique of ideology. Koehane, Nannerl O.et al. eds. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Le Doeuff, Michele. 1989. L'étude et le rouet. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
Lewis, P.1982. The Post‐structuralist condition. Diacritics12: 2–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lloyd, Genevieve. 1984. The man of reason: “Male” and “female” in western philosophy. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press; London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Lonzi, Carla. 1974. Sputiamo su Hegel. Milan: Rivolta Femminile.Google Scholar
Lyotard, J. F.1978. One of the things at stake in women's struggle. Substance9(20): 9–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lyotard, J. F.1979. La condition postmoderne. Paris: Minuit.Google Scholar
Lyotard, J. F.1985. Le différend. Paris: Minuit.Google Scholar
Nicholson, Linda, ed. 1990. Feminism/postmodernism. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Owen, C.1983. The discourse of others: Feminism and postmodernism. In The anti‐aesthetics. Foster, H., ed. Washington: Bay Press.Google Scholar
Prigogine, Ilya and Stengers, Isabelle. 1978. La nouvelle alliance: Metamorphose de la science. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Prins, Baukje. 1989. Women, morality and the problem of exclusion. A critical inquiry into the ethical theories of Jürgen Habermas and Nel Noddings. M.A. Thesis, University of Groningen.Google Scholar
Rich, Adrienne. 1979a. On lies, secrets and silences. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Rich, Adrienne. 1979b. Of woman born. New York: Bantam Books.Google Scholar
Scott, Joan. 1986. Gender: A useful category of historical analysis. American Historical Review91(5): 237–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sevenhuijsen, Selma. 1987. De orde van het vaderschap. Amsterdam: I.I.S.C.Google Scholar
Spivak, Gaytri. 1987. In other worlds. New York: Methuen.Google Scholar
Stimpson, Catharine R. 1988. Where the meanings are. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Stimpson, Catharine R. with Kressner Cobb, Nina. 1986. Women's studies in the 90s. New York: Ford Foundation.Google Scholar
Suleiman, Susan. 1986. The female body in western culture: Contemporary perspectives. Cambridge and London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Vetterling‐Braggin, Mary. 1977. Feminism and philosophy. Totowa, N.J.: Littlefield Adam and Co.Google Scholar
Violi, Patrizia. 1986. L'infinito singolare: Considerazioni sulla differenze sessuale nel linguaggio. Verona: Essedue.Google Scholar
Wollstonecraft, Mary. [1792] 1975. A vindication of the rights of woman. London: Penguin; New York: WW. Norton.Google Scholar
Woolf, Virginia. 1928. A room of one's own. London: Penguin; New York: Harcourt Brace.Google Scholar
Woolf, Virginia. 1938. Three guineas. London: Penguin; New York: Harcourt Brace.Google Scholar
Woolf, Virginia. 1979. Women and writing. London: The Women's Press;. New York: Harcourt Brace. Yale French Studies. 1986. Special issue on Simone de Beauvoir. 72.Google Scholar
Young‐Bruehl, Elizabeth. 1987. The education of women as philosophers. Signs12(2): 207–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar