Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-8r8nv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-09T19:57:46.317Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Universality and Difference: O'Keeffe and McClintock

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2020

San MacColl
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This is a critique of the idea of universality in art and science that considers the examples of Georgia O'Keeffe's work as an artist and Barbara McClintock's work as a scientist. A consideration of their lives and work brings out their differences in the inherently male fields of art and science. Their underlying commonality is found in a shared view of nature involving fluidity, concern for detail, and caring and feeling, traits often characterized as “female”. This enables each of them to assert her own identity in her work and contributes to its remarkable success.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Hypatia , Volume 5 , Issue 2: Special Issue: Feminism and Aesthetics , Summer 1990 , pp. 149 - 157
Copyright
Copyright © 1990 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Beauvoir, Simone de. [1953] 1972. The second sex. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Berger, John. 1972. Ways of seeing. London: BBC and Harmondsworth: Penguin. Chicago, Judy. 1975. Through the flower: My struggle as a woman artist. New York: Doubleday Anchor.Google Scholar
Cowart, Jack, and Hamilton, Juan, eds. 1987. Georgia O'Keeffe: Art and letters. Washington: National Gallery.Google Scholar
Drobojowska, Hunter. 1986. Georgia O'Keeffe 1887‐1986. Art News 85 (6): 119–121.Google Scholar
Hughes, Robert. 1970. Loner in the desert. Time October 12:52–55.Google Scholar
Irigaray, Luce. [1977] 1985. This sex which is not one. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keller, Evelyn Fox. 1983. Afeelingfor the organism: The life and work of Barbara McCiintoclc. New York: Freeman.Google Scholar
Keller, Evelyn Fox. 1985. Re/lections on gender and science. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Kotz, Mary Lynn. 1977. Georgia O'Keeffe at 90. Art News 76 (10): 36–45.Google Scholar
Kuh, Katherine. 1960. The artist's voice. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Lisle, Laurie. 1986. Portrait of an artist: A biography of Georgia O'Keeffe. New York: Washington Square Press.Google Scholar
McClintock, Barbara. 1950. The origin and behavior of mutable loci in maize. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 36:344–355.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McClintock, Barbara, and Creighton, Harriet. 1931. A correlation of cytological and genetic crossing over in Zea Mays. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 17: 492–497.Google Scholar
Messinger, Lisa Mintz. 1984. Georgia O'Keeffe. The Metropolitan Museum of Art Bulletin.Google Scholar
Moritz, Charles, ed. 1984. Current Biography Yearbook. New York: Wilson.Google Scholar
O'Keeffe, Georgia. 1976. Georgia O'Keeffe. New York: Viking.Google Scholar
Schwartz, Constance. 1983. Nevekon and O'Keeffe: Independents of the twentieth century. Exhibition Catalogue, Nassau County Museum of Fine Art.Google Scholar
Schor, Naomi. 1987. Reading in detail. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Young, Mahonri Sharp. 1987. In O'Keeffe's world. Apollo 126(309): 362–366.Google Scholar